medigraphic.com
SPANISH

Revista Mexicana de Investigación en Psicología

Órgano Oficial del Sistema Mexicano de Investigación en Psicología (SMIP)
  • Contents
  • View Archive
  • Information
    • General Information        
    • Directory
  • Publish
    • Instructions for authors        
  • medigraphic.com
    • Home
    • Journals index            
    • Register / Login
  • Mi perfil

2010, Number 2

<< Back Next >>

Rev Mex Invest Psic 2010; 2 (2)

Events, Constructs and the Experimental Synthesis of Behavior

García CCH
Full text How to cite this article

Language: Spanish
References: 12
Page: 89-92
PDF size: 143.17 Kb.


Key words:

events, constructs, behavior, experimental synthesis of behavior, ideologies’ unification, confusion.

ABSTRACT

It is proposed the need to clearly differentiate the concepts “event” and “construct” if the goal is to unify the different existing ideologies so as to reach a higher scientific and professional development of psychology, which is the intention of the programmatic contribution of the experimental synthesis of behavior, formulated in Ardila’s target-article. These concepts are analyzed in depth, distinguishing cultural, descriptive and explanatory constructs, stating the detrimental effect of mixing up events with constructs and considering cultural constructs as scientific ones. Finally, it is specified certain confusion from the type explained in the programmatic contribution of the experimental synthesis of behavior.


REFERENCES

  1. Ardila, R. (2010). La unidad de la psicología. El paradigma de la Síntesis Experimental del Comportamiento. Revista Mexicana de Investigación en Psicología, 2, 72-83.

  2. Fryling, M. J. & Hayes, L. J. (2009). Psychological events and constructs: An Alliance with Smith. The Psychological Record, 59, 1, 133-142.

  3. García Cadena, C. H. (2007). Introducción al conductismo contemporáneo. Cd. de México, México: Trillas.

  4. García Cadena, C. H. (2009). Como investigar en psicología. Cd. de México, México: Trillas.

  5. Kantor, J. R. (1963-1969). The scientific evolution of psychology (Vols. 1-2). Chicago, EUA: Principia Press.

  6. Ribes, E. (1982). El conductismo: reflexiones críticas. Barcelona, España: Fontanella.

  7. Ribes, E (2000). Las psicologías y la definición de sus objetos de conocimiento. Revista Mexicana de Análisis de la Conducta, 26, 365-382.

  8. Ribes, E. (2004). ¿Es posible unificar los criterios sobre los que se concibe la psicología? Suma Psicológica, 11(1), 9-28.

  9. Skinner, B. F. (1981). Conducta verbal. Cd. de México, México: Trillas.

  10. Smith, N. W. (2007). Events and constructs. The Psychological Record, 57, 169-186.

  11. Smith, N. W. & Smith, L. L. (1996). Field theory in science: Its role as a necessary and sufficient condition in psychology. The Psychological Record, 46(1), 3-19.

  12. Tajfel, H. (1978). Social categorization, social identity, and social comparison. En H. Tajfel (Ed.), Differentiation between social groups: Studies in the social psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 61-67). Londres, Inglaterra: Academic Press.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com

Mi perfil

C?MO CITAR (Vancouver)

Rev Mex Invest Psic. 2010;2