medigraphic.com
SPANISH

Revista de la Facultad de Medicina UNAM

  • Contents
  • View Archive
  • Information
    • General Information        
    • Directory
  • Publish
    • Instructions for authors        
  • medigraphic.com
    • Home
    • Journals index            
    • Register / Login
  • Mi perfil

2006, Number 2

<< Back Next >>

Rev Fac Med UNAM 2006; 49 (2)

Preliminary results of obstetrical peridural analgesics with or without phentanyl

Bracho RRL, Estupiñán RJ, Labrada PAA, Felix BGE
Full text How to cite this article

Language: Spanish
References: 11
Page: 54-57
PDF size: 49.25 Kb.


Key words:

Epidural obstetric analgesia, bupivacaine, phentanyl.

ABSTRACT

Objective: To compare epidural obstetric analgesia using Bupivacaine with or without Phentanyl, measuring the effect and the repercussion upon the mother and the product. Methods: A prospective, transverse, comparative, double blind and experimental study of 32 patients with term, single pregnancies in the first stage of labor was undertaken. Patients randomly entered groups: “A” (n= 16) Bupivacaine (3.75 mg) with Phentanyl (100 µg) or “B” (n= 16) Bupivacaine (12.5 mg). The variables studied were: a) the mother basal and postanalgesia condition, and assessment of pain by Visual Analogue Scale Score; b) the products Apgar and Sivlerman scores, and average oxygen saturation. The mean measures of each variable between both groups were analyzed using χ2. Results: Group “A” had less hemodynamic repercussion upon the patient, with better analgesia, and the baby´s postanalgesic conditions were superior to those of group “B”. Conclusion: Better-quality analgesia, with improved maternal and neonatal conditions were achieved using Bupivacaine with phentanyl. Definitive results will require further study with a larger sample, to determine the existence of low incidence adverse effects.


REFERENCES

  1. Duke J, Rosenberg SG. Anesthesia secrets. Philadelphia: Hanley & Belfus; c1996.

  2. Halpern SH, Walsh V. Epidural ropivacaine versus bupivacaine for labor: a meta-analysis. Anesth Analg 2003; 96(5): 1473-9.

  3. Smedvig JP, Soreide E, Gjessing L. Ropivacaine 1 mg/mL, plus fentanyl 2 microg/mL for epidural analgesia during labour. Is mode of administration important? Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2001; 45(5): 595-9.

  4. Smith G, Covino BG. Acute pain. London: Butterworths, 1985.

  5. Lyons G, Columb M, Hawthorne L, Dresner M. Extradural pain relief in labour: bupivacaine sparing by extradural fentanyl is dose dependent. Br J Anaesth. 1997; 78(5): 493-7.

  6. Melzack R, Wall PD. Textbook of Pain [3º Ed]. London: Ed. Churchill Livingston, 1992.

  7. Instituto Nacional de Perinatología. Normas de neonatología. México: INPer; 1998: 10.

  8. Bell CH, Hughes CW, Oh TH. The pediatric anesthesia handbook. St. Louis: Yale University School of Medicine/Mosby-Year Book, c1991.

  9. Aldrete JA. Anestesiología teórico práctica [2ª]. México, D.F.: Salvat, l991.

  10. Meister GC, D’Angelo R, Owen M, Nelson KE, Gaver R. A comparison of epidural analgesia with 0.125% ropivacaine with fentanyl versus 0.125% bupivacaine with fentanyl during labor. Anesth Analg. 2000; 90(3): 632-7.

  11. Fernandez-Guisasola J, Serrano ML, Cobo B, Munoz L, Plaza A, Trigo C, Del Valle SG. A comparison of 0.0625% bupivacaine with fentanyl and 0.1% ropivacaine with fentanyl for continuous epidural labor analgesia. Anesth Analg. 2001; 92(5): 1261-5.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com

Mi perfil

C?MO CITAR (Vancouver)

Rev Fac Med UNAM . 2006;49