medigraphic.com
SPANISH

Revista Mexicana de Neurociencia

Academia Mexicana de Neurología, A.C.
  • Contents
  • View Archive
  • Information
    • General Information        
    • Directory
  • Publish
    • Instructions for authors        
  • medigraphic.com
    • Home
    • Journals index            
    • Register / Login
  • Mi perfil

2010, Number 1

<< Back Next >>

Rev Mex Neuroci 2010; 11 (1)

Surgical outcome f Parkinson’s disease at the Stereotactic and Functional Neurosurgery and Radiosurgery Unit, Mexico General Hospital, Between 1992 and 2009

Sandoval LI, Jiménez F, Soto J, Velasco F, Carrillo-Ruíz JD, Gómez P, Suárez R
Full text How to cite this article

Language: Spanish
References: 20
Page: 20-25
PDF size: 71.56 Kb.


Key words:

Parkinson’s Disease, deep brain stimulation, pallidotomy, thalamotomy, RAPRL ablation.

ABSTRACT

Introduction: Parkinson’s disease (PD) affects nearly 1 % of the population over 50 years worldwide. The diagnosis of this disease is based on clinical characteristics wich include: tremor, rigidity, bradikinesia and postural instability. Pharmacological treatment sometimes is insufficient to alleviate this symptoms, and some patients will requiere surgery to treat them. Deep brain stimulation (DBS) of the bilateral subthalamic nucleus (STN) has been considered the gold standar for the surgical treatment of PD. Nonetheless pallidotomy, prelemniscal radiations (RAPRL) ablation and thalamotomy, are surgical techniques that had been proved their efficacy for the treatment of PD. The Functional and Stereotactic Neurosurgery and Radiosurgery (FNSR) Unit of the General Hospital Mexico (GHM) was the first medical center in our country to operate on patients with PD in the 70’s decade. So far the outcome of the surgery in general, has not been published yet. The main purpose of this paper is to describe the surgical results of the patients with PD operated on at the FNSR during the period 1992-2009. Materials and methods: 33 medical files were reviewed and considered for this paper, at the FNSR. For the statistical analysis we use de median, media, standar deviation and Wilcoxon test to evaluate the results. We also made statistical correlations to define a positive one based on clinimetrics and type of surgery used for each patient. Results: The age of the patients was in the range between 38 and 83 years old. The median test of the presurgical Hoen and Yahr (HY) scale was 3, compared to 2 postoperative (P ‹ 0.0001). The surgical target internal globus pallidus was the most frequently used, but we cannot find a significant correlation between this and the UPDRS and HY scales. Discussion: Currently there is no the optimal surgical treatment for PD, however the surgical techniques used, ablation or DBS, has proven to be very effective in the treatment of some of the symptoms of PD. Our unit is a main medical center in the country to perform this kind of surgeries, but we do not have the whole clinical information through this decades of the patients that had been treated at the FNSR. This is because most clinical records are eliminated of the hospital archive. We report on 33 patients that were operated on at our unit, in different surgical targets, and our clinical results are very similar to other’s autors series. The most frequent surgical type of procedure was ablation, instead of DBS; this was because of economic reasons. Conclusion: An alectronic database is needed to preserve the clinical and surgical records of our patients.


REFERENCES

  1. Lang AE, Lozano AM. Parkinson’s disease: first of two parts. N Engl J Med 1998; 339: 1044-53.

  2. Uc EY, Struck LK, Rodnitzky RL, Zimmerman B, Dobson J, Evans WJ. Predictors of weight loss in Parkinson’s disease. Mov Disord 2006; 21: 930-6.

  3. Cloutier M, Lang AE. Movement disorders: an overview. In: Factor SA, Lang AE, Weiner WJ (eds.). Drug induced movement disorders. Malden, MA: Blackwell; 2005, p. 3-19.

  4. Volkmann J. Deep brain stimulation for the treatment of Parkinson’s disease. J Clin Neurophysiol 2004; 21: 6-17.

  5. Koller WC, Pahwa R, Lyons KE, Albanese A. Surgical treatment of Parkinson’s disease. J Neurol Sci 1999; 167: 1-10.

  6. Lyons KE, Pahwa R. Deep brain stimulation in Parkinson’s disease. Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep 2004; 4: 290-5.

  7. Deuschl G, Schade-Brittinger C, Krack P, Volkmann J, Schafer H, Botzel K, et al. A randomized trial of deepbrain stimulation for Parkinson’s disease. N Engl J Med 2006; 355: 896-908.

  8. Russmann H, Ghika J, Combrement P, Villemure JG, Bogousslavsky J, Burkhard PR, et al. L-Dopa-induced dyskinesia improvement after STN-DBS depends upon medication reduction. Neurology 2004; 63: 153-5.

  9. Nandi D, Aziz TZ, Giladi N, Winter J, Stein JF. Reversal of akinesia in experimental parkinsonism by GABA antagonist microinjections in the pedunculopontine nucleus. Brain 2002; 125: 2418-30.

  10. Munro-Davies LE, Winter J, Aziz TZ, Stein JF. The role of the pedunculopontine region in basalganglia mechanisms of akinesia. Exp Brain Res 1999; 129: 511-7.

  11. Delwaide PJ. Parkinsonian rigidity. Funct Neurol 2001; 16: 147-56.

  12. Pahapill PA, Lozano AM. The pedunculopontine nucleus and Parkinson’s disease. Brain 2000; 123: 1767-83.

  13. Mazzone P, Lozano A, Stanzione P, Galati S, Scarnati E, Peppe A, et al. Implantation of human pedunculopontine nucleus: a safe and clinically relevant target in Parkinson’sx4 disease. Neuroreport 2005; 16: 1877-81.

  14. Krauss JK, Jankovic J, Lai EC, Rettig GM, Grossman RG. Posteroventralmedial pallidotomy in levodopa-unresponsive parkinsonism. Arch Neurol 1997; 54: 1026-9.

  15. Lang AE, Lozano AM, Montgomery E, Duff J, Tasker R, Hutchinson W. Posteroventral medial pallidotomy in advanced Parkinson’s disease. N Engl J Med 1997; 337: 1036-42.

  16. Shannon KM, Penn RD, Kroin JS, Adler CH, Janko KA, York M, et al. Stereotactic pallidotomy for the treatment of Parkinson’s disease. Efficacy and adverse effects at 6 months in 26 patients. Neurology 1998; 50: 434-8.

  17. Jankovic J, Lai E, Ben-Arie L, Krauss JK, Grossman R. Levodopa-induced dyskinesias treated by pallidotomy. J Neurol Sci 1999; 167: 62-7.

  18. Ondo WG, Jankovic J, Lai EC, Sankhla C, Khan M, Ben-Arie L, et al. Assessment of motor function after stereotactic pallidotomy. Neurology 1998; 50: 266-70.

  19. Samuel M, Caputo E, Brooks DJ, Schrag A, Scaravilli T, Branston NM, et al. A study of medial pallidotomy for Parkinson’s disease: clinical outcome, MRI location and complications. Brain 1998; 121(Pt 1): 59-75.

  20. Alterman RL, Kelly PJ. Pallidotomy technique and results: the New York University experience. Neurosurg Clin North Am 1998; 9: 337-43.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com

Mi perfil

C?MO CITAR (Vancouver)

Rev Mex Neuroci. 2010;11