Rojano-Santillán A, Martínez-Ruiz VM, Pizano-Damasco MA, Banderas-Tarabay JA

Language: Spanish
References: 18
Page: 130-136
PDF size: 107.09 Kb.

ABSTRACT

The study assessed the dosage, clinical sedative effect, and safety of intraoral and intranasal midazolam in 20 children from the pediatric dental clinic. Data was collected fasm children classified as ASA 1 and Frankl type II and III. Sedation was adequate to ensure successful completion of treatment in patients with oral sedation. Sedation was achieved with an oral dosage of 0.3 mg/kg of midazolam chlorhydrate. There were no signs of respiratory depression or of oxygen desaturation below 98% on pulse oximetry. No supplemental oxygen was required and there were no other complications. It is concluded that intraoral midazolam is a safe and effective alternative in the definitive treatment to reduce in pedodontics children.

REFERENCES

1. McDonald RE, Keller MJ. Dentistry for the child and adolescent. 5ª ed. Argentina: Edit. Médica Panamericana, 1990: 173-187.

2. Soberanis MM. Sedación en Odontopediatría. ADM 1995; 52(5): 261-265.

3. Finn SB. Odontología Pediátrica y del adolescente. 4ª ed. México: Edit. Interamericana, 1980: 14-39.

4. Ojeda-León S. Premedicación en Odontopediatría. ADM 1983; 40(1-2):10-12.

5. Guerra LS, Rotberg JS. Tratamiento dental del niño menor de tres años. ADM 1976; 4: 65-76.

6. Dávila JM, Herman AE, Proskin HM, Vitale D. Comparison of the sedative efectiveness of two pharmacological regimens. Journal of dentistry for children, 1994; 4: 276-281.

7. Kupietzky A, Houpt M. Midazolam: a review of it’s use for conscious sedation of children. Pediatric Dentistry 1993; 15(4): 237-241.

8. Malamed SF. Sedación, Guía práctica. 3ª Ed. España: Edit. Mosby; 1996: 15-147.

9. Hartgraves PM, Primosch RE. An evaluation of oral and nasal midazolam for pediatric dental sedation. Journal of Dentistry for children 1994; 1: 175-180.

10. Reeves ST, Wiedenfeld KR, Wrobleski J, Hardin CL, Pinosky ML. A randomized double blind trial of chloral hydrate/hydroxyzine versus midazolam/acetaminofen in the sedation of pediatric dental outpatients. Journal of dentistry for children 1996; 2: 95-99.

11. Gallardo F, Cornejo G, Borie R. Oral midazolam as premedication for the apprehensive child before dental treatment. Journal of clinical Pediatric Dentistry 1994; 18(2): 123-126.

12. Sander JB. The effect of sleep on conscious sedation: a follow up study. Journal of clinical of Pediatric Dentistry 1997; 21(2): 131-134.

13. Goodman, Gilman. Las bases farmacológicas de la terapéutica. 9ª ed, México: Edit. McGraw Hill Interamericana, 1996: 385-451.

14. The American Academy of Pediatric Dentistry, Guidelines for the elective use of conscious sedation, deep sedation, and general anaestesia in pediatric patients. Pediatric Dentistry 1992; 7(4): 334-337.

15. Ciancio SG. Farmacología clínica para odontólogos. 3ª ed. México: Edit. Manual Moderno; 1990: 160-174.

16. Reinemer HC, Wilson C, Webb A. comparison of the two oral ketamine diazepam regimens for sedating anxious pediatric dental patients. Pediatric Dentistry 1996; 18(4): 294-300.

17. Meyer ML, Mourino AP, Farrington FH. Comparison of triazolam to a cloral hydrate/hydroxycine combination in the sedation of pediatric dental patients. Pediatric Dentistry 1990; 12(5): 283-287.

18. Kupietzky A, Holan G, Shapira J. Intranasal midazolam better at effecting amnesia after sedation than oral hydroxyzine: a pilot study. Pediatric Dentistry 1996; 18(1): 32-34.