medigraphic.com
SPANISH

MediSan

ISSN 1029-3019 (Electronic)
  • Contents
  • View Archive
  • Information
    • General Information        
    • Directory
  • Publish
    • Instructions for authors        
  • medigraphic.com
    • Home
    • Journals index            
    • Register / Login
  • Mi perfil

2013, Number 12

<< Back

MediSan 2013; 17 (12)

The ABC in reviewing a thesis

Orozco GMI, Palú OA, Plasencia AC, Romero GLI
Full text How to cite this article

Language: Spanish
References: 4
Page: 9180-9192
PDF size: 419.00 Kb.


Key words:

postgraduate, thesis, examining board, universalization.

ABSTRACT

The purpose of this scientific article is to promote updated methodological elements related to one of the most important processes in the postgraduate activity: evaluation of the thesis, in which health professionals are increasingly involved; process is not well implemented by all in the methodological and educational aspect. The proposed guidance could be an important tool with existing ones, which will improve the training of evaluators and the quality in performing this important function.


REFERENCES

  1. Bavarre Vea HD, Oliva Pérez M, Horsford Saing R, Ranero Aparicio V, Coutin Marie G, Díaz Llanes G, et al. Metodología de la investigación en Atención Primaria de Salud. Libro de Texto. La Habana; Editorial Ciencias Médicas;2007.

  2. Guía para elaborar un proyecto de investigación. Arch argent pediatr. 2011 [citado 12 Ene 2012];109(4). Disponible en: http://www.scielo.org.ar/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0325- 00752011000400023&lng=es

  3. Jiménez Arias ME. ¿Qué trato merece la redacción científica? MEDISAN. 2007[citado 12 Ene 2012];11(1). Disponible en: http://bvs.sld.cu/revistas/san/vol11_1_07/san04107.htm

  4. Silva Ayçaguer LC. Cultura estadística e investigación científica en el campo de la salud: una mirada crítica. Madrid: Ediciones Díaz de Santos;1997.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com

Mi perfil

C?MO CITAR (Vancouver)

MediSan. 2013;17