medigraphic.com
SPANISH

MediSur

ISSN 1727-897X (Electronic)
  • Contents
  • View Archive
  • Information
    • General Information        
    • Directory
  • Publish
    • Instructions for authors        
  • medigraphic.com
    • Home
    • Journals index            
    • Register / Login
  • Mi perfil

2013, Number 6

<< Back Next >>

Medisur 2013; 11 (6)

Risk factors associated with ectopic pregnancy

Hernández NJ, Valdés YM, Torres CAO
Full text How to cite this article

Language: Spanish
References: 26
Page: 647-655
PDF size: 216.35 Kb.


Key words:

pregnancy, ectopic, risk factors, maternal mortality, morbidity.

ABSTRACT

Background: ectopic pregnancy has doubled in most industrialized countries and it is a major cause of maternal death.
Objective: to identify risk factors predisposing to ectopic pregnancy.
Methods: a case-control study was conducted in a universe of 132 patients from the municipality of Eastern Havana, operated on for ectopic pregnancy at the Dr. Luís Díaz Soto Hospital from 2009 to 2011. A random sample of 66 patients was selected to compose the study group; there was other control group with the same number of patients who didn’t undergo surgery for ectopic pregnancy in this period. Variables analyzed were related to sociodemographic, obstetric and gynecological and surgical risk factors, as well as sexual behavior and smoking. The mean, standard deviation, percentage, Student's t test, chi-square statistic and odds ratio were used.
Results: ectopic pregnancy was more common in white women aged 25 to 34 years; history of pelvic inflammatory disease, endometriosis, three or more induced abortions, infertility, previous ectopic pregnancy, early onset of sexual intercourse, multiple sexual partners and use of intrauterine devices were predisposing factors for ectopic pregnancy; unlike the education level, occupation, amount of deliveries, appendectomy and prior tubal surgery, or smoking.
Conclusions: there are multiple risk factors leading to ectopic pregnancy and contributing to increased maternal morbidity and mortality; many of them can be modified in the primary health care.


REFERENCES

  1. Varma R, Gupta J. . Tubal ectopic pregnancy. Clin Evid. 2009 ; 20: 1406.

  2. Enríquez Domínguez B, Fuentes González L, Gutiérrez González N, León Barzaga M. Clínica y nuevas tecnologías diagnósticas en el embarazo ectópico. Rev. Cubana Obstet Ginecol [revista en Internet]. 2003 [ cited 6 Mar 2012 ] ; 29 (3): [aprox. 13p]. Available from: http://scielo.sld.cu/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext& pid=S0138-600X2003000300001.

  3. Shaw JL, Dey SK, Critchley HO, Horne AW. Current knowledge of the aetiology of human tubal ectopic pregnancy. Hum Reprod Update. 2010 ; 16 (4): 432-44.

  4. Urrutia MT, Poupin L, Alarcón P, Rodríguez M, Stuven L. Embarazo ectópico: factores de riesgo y características clínicas de la enfermedad en un grupo de mujeres chilenas. Rev Chil Obstet Ginecol. 2007 ; 72 (3): 154-9.

  5. Fernández Arenas C, Guerra Castro MM, Soler Cárdenas SF. Estrategia educativa para gestión del conocimiento sobre embarazo ectópico en Atención Primaria de Salud. Revista Médica Electrónica [revista en Internet]. 2009 [ cited 6 Mar 2012 ] ; 31 (2): [aprox. 19p]. Available from: http://www.revmatanzas.sld.cu/revista medica/ano 2009/vol2 2009/tema01.htm.

  6. Luzardo Silveira EM, Parra Infante N, Sánchez Barrero N, Tamayo Blanco I. Cirugía laparoscópica de urgencia en el embarazo ectópico. MEDISAN [revista en Internet]. 2011 [ cited 6 Mar 2012 ] ; 15 (9): [aprox. 7p]. Available from: http://bvs.sld.cu/revistas/san/vol15_9_11/san099 11.htm.

  7. Trabert B, Holt VL, Yu O, Van Den Eeden SK, Scholes D. Population-based ectopic pregnancy trends, 1993–2007. Am J Prev Med. 2011 ; 40 (5): 556-60.

  8. Rodríguez Morales Y, Altunaga Palacio M. Factores epidemiológicos en el embarazo ectópico. Rev. Cubana Obstet Ginecol [revista en Internet]. 2010 [ cited 23 Abr 2012 ] ; 36 (1): [aprox. 10p]. Available from: http://scielo.sld.cu/scielo.php?pid=S0138-600X20 10000100006&script=sci_arttext..

  9. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Ectopic pregnancy mortality-Florida, 2009-2010. MMWR. 2012 ; 61 (6): 106-9.

  10. Sweet RL. Treatment strategies for pelvic inflammatory disease. Expert Opin Pharmacother. 2009 ; 10 (5): 823-37.

  11. Shaw JL, Wills GS, Lee KF, Horner PJ, McClure MO, Abrahams VM, et al. Chlamydia trachomatis infection increases fallopian tube PROKR2 via TLR2 and NFkB activation resulting in a microenvironment predisposed to ectopic pregnancy. Am J Pathol. 2011 ; 178 (1): 253-60.

  12. Machado AC, Guimarães EM, Sakurai E, Fioravante FC, Amaral WN, Alves MF. High Titers of Chlamydia trachomatis Antibodies in Brazilian Women with Tubal Occlusion or Previous Ectopic Pregnancy. Infect Dis Obstet Gynecol. 2007 ; 24: 816.

  13. Howard FM. Surgical treatment of endometriosis. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am. 2011 ; 38 (4): 677-86.

  14. Clayton HB, Schieve LA, Peterson HB, Jamieson DJ, Reynolds MA, Wright VC. Ectopic pregnancy risk with assisted reproductive technology procedures. Obstet Gynecol. 2006 ; 107 (3): 595-604.

  15. Kamel RM. Management of the infertile couple: an evidence-based protocol. Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2010 ; 8: 21.

  16. Weigert M, Gruber D, Pernicka E, Bauer P, Feichtinger W. Previous tubal ectopic pregnancy raises the incidence of repeated ectopic pregnancies in In Vitro fertilization-embryo transfer patients. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2009 ; 26 (1): 13-7.

  17. Fischer S, Keirse MJ. When Salpingectomy Is Not Salpingectomy-Ipsilateral Recurrence of Tubal Pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol Int [revista en Internet]. 2009 [ cited 23 Abr 2012 ] ; 5: [aprox. 3p]. Available from: http://www.hindawi.com/journals/ogi/2009/52486 4/.

  18. Deutchman M, Tubay AT, Turok DK. First trimester bleeding. Am Fam Physician. 2009 ; 79 (11): 985-92.

  19. Cartwright J, Duncan WC, Critchley HO, Horne AW. Serum biomarkers of tubal ectopic pregnancy: current candidates and future possibilities. Reproduction. 2009 ; 138 (1): 9-22.

  20. Cutié Bressler ML, Figueroa Mendoza M, Lestayo Dorta C, Cubero Menéndez O. Embarazo ectópico. Su comportamiento en los años 1989-1999. Rev. Cubana Obstet Ginecol [revista en Internet]. 2001 [ cited 23 Abr 2012 ] ; 27 (1): [aprox. 8p]. Available from: http://scielo.sld.cu/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext& pid=S0138-600X2001000100001.

  21. Casanova Carrillo C. Epidemiología del embarazo ectópico en un hospital ginecoobstétrico. Rev Cubana Enfermer [revista en Internet]. 2003 [ cited 24 Ene 2013 ] ; 19 (3): [aprox. 8p]. Available from: http://scielo.sld.cu/scielo.php?pid=S0864-031920 03000300003&script=sci_arttext.

  22. Schwandt HM, Creanga AA, Danso KA, Adanu RM, Agbenyega T, Hindin MJ. A comparison of women with induced abortion, spontaneous abortion and ectopic pregnancy in Ghana. Contraception. 2011 ; 84 (1): 87-93.

  23. Pientong C, Ekalaksananan T, Wonglikitpanya N, Swadpanich U, Kongyingyoes B, Kleebkaow P. Chlamydia trachomatis infections and the risk of ectopic pregnancy in Khon Kaen women. J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2009 ; 35 (4): 775-81.

  24. Balestena Sánchez JM, Rodríguez A, Reguera Cabrera O. Factores epidemiológicos del embarazo ectópico. Rev. Cubana Obstet Ginecol [revista en Internet]. 2002 [ cited 23 Ene 2012 ] ; 28 (3): [aprox. 9p]. Available from: http://scielo.sld.cu/scielo.php?pid=S0138-600X20 02000300004&script=sci_arttext.

  25. Moschos E, Twickler DM. Intrauterine devices in early pregnancy: findings on ultrasound and clinical outcomes. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2011 ; 204 (5): 427-e1-6.

  26. Mikkelsen MS, Hoigaard A, Bor P. Extrauterine pregnancy with gestagen-releasing intrauterine device in situ. Ugeskr Laeger. 2010 ; 172 (17): 1304-5.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com

Mi perfil

C?MO CITAR (Vancouver)

Medisur. 2013;11