Medina-Franco H, Rojas-García P, Suárez-Bobadilla YL, Sánchez-Ramón A

Language: English
References: 9
Page: 379-383
PDF size: 138.38 Kb.

ABSTRACT

Introduction. Breast-conserving surgery (BCS) is the standard of care for treatment of early breast cancer. Factors associated with poor cosmetic results are not well described. The aim of the present study was to evaluate factors associated with breast asymmetry after BCS for invasive breast cancer. Material and methods. Patients who underwent unilateral BCS for invasive breast cancer and completed at least six months after radiation therapy were included. After informed consent, patients answered a validated questionnaire for breast symmetry. Demographic, clinical-pathological and surgical variables were recorded. Bilateral breast volume was measured in office and volume difference › 20% was considered objective asymmetry. Variables were analyzed with χ² test and significance was considered at p ‹ 0.05. Results. One-hundred and thirtythree patients were included. Mean patient age was 56 ± 9 years. Most patients were married (78%) with educational level of high school or greater (50.8%). Mean body mass index (BMI) was 25 ± 8. Twelve percent of patients underwent ≥ 2 surgical procedures. Eighty-one percent of patients had tumors › 1 cm. Twenty-two percent of patients had objective breast asymmetry and 27% perceived themselves with asymmetry. There were no significant relationship between objective and subjective asymmetry. The only variable significantly associated with perception of breast asymmetry was educational level ≥ high school. Conclusions. There was no relationship between subjective and objective breast asymmetry after BCS, suggesting that cosmetic results are mainly related to patient subjective perception. The only variable associated with subjective breast asymmetry was high educational level, possibly because higher cosmetic expectations in this group of patients.

REFERENCES

1. Stewart SL, King JB, Thompson TD, et al. Cancer mortality surveillance-United States, 1990-2000. MMWR Surveill Summ 2004; 53: 100-08. 2. Newman LA, Kuerer HM. Advances in breast conservation therapy. J Clin Oncol 2005; 23: 1685-97. 3 Fisher B, Anderson S, Bryant J, et al. Twenty-year follow-up of a randomized trial comparing total mastectomy, lumpectomy, and lumpectomy plus irradiation for the treatment of invasive breast cancer. N Engl J Med 2002; 347: 1233-41.

2. Veronesi U, Cascinelli N, Mariani L, et al. Twenty-year followup of a randomized study comparing breast-conserving surgery with radical mastectomy for early breast cancer. N Engl J Med 2002; 347: 1227-32.

3. Morris AD, Morris RD, Wilson JF, et al. Breast-conserving therapy vs mastectomy in early-stage breast cancer: a meta-analysis of 10-year survival. Cancer J Sci Am 1997; 3: 6-12.

4. NIH consensus conference. Treatment of early-stage breast cancer. JAMA 1991; 265: 391-5.

5. Alderman AK, Wilkins EG, Lowery JC, et al. Determinants of patient satisfaction in postmastectomy breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 2000; 106: 769-76.

6. Morrow M, Scott SK, Menck HR, et al. Factors influencing the use of breast reconstruction postmastectomy: a National Cancer Database study. J Am Coll Surg 2001; 192: 1-8.

7. Morrow M, White J, Moughan J, et al. Factors predicting the use of breast-conserving therapy in stage I and II breast carcinoma. J Clin Oncol 2001; 19: 2254-62.

8. Medina-Franco H, García-Alvarez MN, Rojas-García P, Trabanino C, Drucker-Zertuche M, Arcila D. Body image perception and quality of life in patients who underwent breast surgery. Am Surg 2012; 76: 1000-05