medigraphic.com
SPANISH

Acta Pediátrica de México

Órgano Oficial del Instituto Nacional de Pediatría
  • Contents
  • View Archive
  • Information
    • General Information        
    • Directory
  • Publish
    • Instructions for authors        
  • medigraphic.com
    • Home
    • Journals index            
    • Register / Login
  • Mi perfil

2014, Number 1

<< Back Next >>

Acta Pediatr Mex 2014; 35 (1)

The prenatal pediatric visit

López-Candiani C
Full text How to cite this article

Language: Spanish
References: 15
Page: 69-73
PDF size: 237.23 Kb.


Key words:

Infant newborn, infant care, parental education.

ABSTRACT

Pediatric prenatal consultation is not common in México, although it has benefits for physician, family and the future infant. It allows the beginning of a physician-family relationship to obtain medical information and identify possible risks in mother and infant newborn; it gives parents information on medical care in the delivery room and anticipates actions with parental involving in decisions when a high-risk is detected. Emotional support to mothers is given and it begins parental education in infants care.


REFERENCES

  1. American Academy of Pediatrics, Committee on Psychosocial Aspects of Child and Family Health. The prenatal visit. Pediatrics 1996;97:141-42.

  2. Cohen GJ. The prenatal visit. Pediatrics 2009;124:1227-32.

  3. Griswold KJ, Fanaroff JM. An evidence-based overview of prenatal consultation with focus on infants born at the limit of viability. Pediatrics 2010; 125: e931-37.

  4. Friedman S, Flidel-Rimon O, Lavie E, Shinwell ES. The effect of prenatal consultation with a neonatologist on human milk feeding in preterm infants. Acta Paediatr 2004;93:775-778.

  5. Bastek TK, Richardson DK, Zunpancic JAF, Burns JP. Prenatal consultation practices at the border of viability: A regional survey. Pediatrics 2005;116:407-413.

  6. American Academy of Pediatrics, American Heart Association. Neonatal Resuscitation Textbook. 6th Ed. Elk Grove, IL: American Academy of Pediatrics & American Heart Association, 2010.

  7. Bonuck KA, Trombley M, Freeman K, McKee D. Randomized, controlled trial of a prenatal and posnatal lactation consultant intervention on duration and intensity of breastfeeding up to 12 months. Pediatrics 2005;116:1413- 1426.

  8. Márquez Borroto PM, Vergel García M, Bermúdez Muñoz G, Romero Marín RE, Hernández Bermúdez VJ, Bouza Montano HP. Puericultura prenatal: Importancia en la promoción de la lactancia materna. Medicentro 2004;8: e1-e6.

  9. Pisacane A, Continisio GI, Aldinucci M, D’Amora S, Cortinisio P. A controlled trial of the father’s role in breastfeeding promotion. Pediatrics 2005;116:e494-98.

  10. Olsson P, Jansson L, Norberg A. Parenthood as talked about Swedish ante and posnatal midwifery consultations. Scand J Caring Sci 1998;12:205-214.

  11. Crombleholme TM, D’Alton M, Cendron M, Alman B, Goldberg MD, Klauber GT, et al. Prenatal diagnosis and the pediatric surgeon: the impact of prenatal consultation on perinatal management. J Pediatr Surg 1996;31:156-62.

  12. Paul DA, Epps S, Leef KH, Stefano JL. Prenatal consultation with a neonatologist prior to preterm delivery. J Perinatol 2001;21:431-7.

  13. Halamek LP. The advantages of prenatal consultation by a neonatologist. J Perinatol 2001;21:116-20.

  14. Respondek- Liberska M, Sysa A, Gadzinowski J. The cost of newborn transportation to rhe referral centers in comparison to the cost of the transportin utero. Ginekol Pol 2004;75:326-31.

  15. Scher MS. Fetal and neonatal neurologic consultations: identifying brain disorders in the context of fetal-maternalplacental disease. Semin Pediatr Neurol 2001;8:55-73.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com

Mi perfil

C?MO CITAR (Vancouver)

Acta Pediatr Mex. 2014;35