medigraphic.com
SPANISH

Revista Mexicana de Patología Clínica y Medicina de Laboratorio

ISSN 0185-6014 (Print)
Órgano oficial de difusión de la Federación Mexicana de Patología Clínica, AC y de la Asociación Latinoamericana de Patología Clínica/Medicina de Laboratorio
  • Contents
  • View Archive
  • Information
    • General Information        
    • Directory
  • Publish
    • Instructions for authors        
  • medigraphic.com
    • Home
    • Journals index            
    • Register / Login
  • Mi perfil

2014, Number 1

<< Back Next >>

Rev Mex Patol Clin Med Lab 2014; 61 (1)

Analysis of results of D-dimer in patients over 50 years

Pérez-Ong JE, Vera-Delgado JA
Full text How to cite this article

Language: Spanish
References: 6
Page: 24-27
PDF size: 381.66 Kb.


Key words:

D-dimer, diagnostic, deep venous thrombosis, pulmonary embolism.

ABSTRACT

The incidence of deep venous thrombosis (DVT) and pulmonary embolism (PE) rises exponentially with age. Around 65% of those diagnosed with this medical entities are 60 years or older. For the exclusion of DVT and PE in patients older than 50 years, the use of D-dimer is less specific. That is why it is necessary to evaluate the sensibility and specificity using an age-adjusted cut-off value. Methods: A retrospective analysis of D-dimer results was made in patients over 50 years old hospitalized in March-June 2013. The clinical probability was calculated using Wells score. The D-dimer analysis was performed with the Cardiac Reader by Roche Diagnostics®. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value were calculated using the universal cut-off value (0.5 µg/mL) and the one proposed by Haas and his team (age-adjusted cut-off value). Results: Using the universal cut-off value, the sensitivity obtained was 100%, specificity 25% (CI 95% 0.13-0.36), positive predictive value (PPV) 13% and negative predictive value (NPV) 100%. Using the one proposed by Haas and his team, the sensitivity was 100%, specificity 36% (CI 95% 0.2-0.4), PPV 15%, NPV 100%. Conclusions: The use of an age-adjusted cut-off value and the combination with a low clinical probability (Wells score) greatly increase the proportion of older patients in whom DVT and PE can safely be excluded without needing further studies like compression ultrasonography.


REFERENCES

  1. Douma RA, Le Gal G, Sohne M, Righini M et al. Potential of an age adjusted D-dimer cut-off value to improve exclusión of pulmonary embolism in older patients: a retrospective analysis of three large cohorts. BMJ. 2010; 340: c1475.

  2. Well PS, Anderson DR, Rodger M, Forgie M, Kearon C et al. Evaluation of D-dimer in the diagnosis of suspected deep-vein thrombosis. N Engl J Med. 2003; 349 (13): 1227-1235.

  3. Haas FJ, Schutgens RE, Biesma DH. An age adapted approach for the use of D-dimers in the exclusion of deep venous thrombosis. Am J Hematol. 2009; 84 (8): 448-491.

  4. Harper PL, Theakston E, Ahmed J, Ockelford P. D-dimer concentration increases with age reducing the clinical value of the D-dimer assay in the eldery. Intern Med J. 2007; 37 (9): 607-613.

  5. Righini M, Goehring C, Bounameaux H, Perrier A. Effects of age on the performance of common diagnostic test for pulmonary embolism. Am J Med. 2000; 109 (5): 357-361.

  6. Freddy T, Angelo Bos, Abdul Adjei, William B et al. Correlates of D-dimer in older persons. Aging Clin Exp Res. 2010: 22 (1): 20-23.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com

Mi perfil

C?MO CITAR (Vancouver)

Rev Mex Patol Clin Med Lab. 2014;61