medigraphic.com
SPANISH

Ginecología y Obstetricia de México

Federación Mexicana de Ginecología y Obstetricia, A.C.
  • Contents
  • View Archive
  • Information
    • General Information        
    • Directory
  • Publish
    • Instructions for authors        
  • medigraphic.com
    • Home
    • Journals index            
    • Register / Login
  • Mi perfil

2014, Number 03

<< Back Next >>

Ginecol Obstet Mex 2014; 82 (03)

Normal values of gases in the vein of the umbilical cord during the postpartum period and postcesarea immediately in normal fetuses to term

Bernardez-Zapata FJ, Moreno-Rey C
Full text How to cite this article

Language: Spanish
References: 10
Page: 170-176
PDF size: 337.17 Kb.


Key words:

Venous gasometric of umbilical cord, normal values.

ABSTRACT

Background: To be able to diagnose and catalogue a patient with imbalance of the acid basic condition a gasometría must be realized. The pH and the gasometría of the blood of umbilical cord are useful tools to study the immediate situation of the newborn child. The values gasométricos in the vein and the artery of the umbilical cord change according to the geographical altitude.
Objective: To identify the normal values of the venous gases of the umbilical cord in the postpartum immediate one of normal fetuses to term, born by obstetric resolution, without hurt, in the Spanish Hospital of the Mexico City and to identify the difference with the considered normal values for other institutions of different conditions of the Mexican Republic located to different altitudes.
Material and method: Transversal, prospective, descriptive and observacional study effected in the service of Obstetrics of the Hospital Español of Mexico (Maternidad Mundet). All the patients were included pregnant woman of term, with pregnancy of normal evolution, with an obstetric resolution without evidence of foetal hurt that they deposited with labor or for elective Caesarean.
Results: The average of the curves of normal distribution of the pH, of the PCO2, of the HCO3, of the PO2, of the base excess and of the foetal hemoglobin they were: 7.34, 39.3081, 20.66, 29.3529,-4.09 and 15.18, respectively. The distribution curves of the analyzed values were normal, in no case there was asymmetry, with a not significant Kolmogorov.
Conclusions: The gasometric of the cord is a simple, practical method and, especially I target to value the foetal condition intraparto. The values found in our analysis do not demonstrate statistically significant differences with the values of other studies effected to minor altitudes that that of the Mexico City. The analysis that here one presents is a partial check of the final sample that will belong 300 individuals. Key words: gasometría venous of umbilical cord, normal values.


REFERENCES

  1. American Academy of Pediatrics. Committee on Fetus and Newborn: Use and abuse of the Apgar score. Pediatrics 1986;78:1148.

  2. Bland RD, Nielson DW. Developmental changes in lung epithelial ion transport and liquid movement. Annu Rev Physiol 1992;54:373.

  3. Aarnoudse JG, Illsley NP, Penfold P, et al. Permeability of the human placenta to bicarbonate: in-vitro perfusion studies. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1984;91:1096.

  4. Nageotte, MP, Gilstrap, LC III. Intrapartum fetal surveillance. In: Creasy & Resnik’s Maternal-Fetal Medicine Principles and Practice. 6th ed. Creasy, Resnik, Iams, Lockwood, Moore (eds), Philadelphia: Saunders, 2009;397.

  5. Blechner JN. Maternal-fetal acid-base physiology. Clin Obstet Gynecol 1993;36:3.

  6. Yeomans RE, Gilstrap L. Umbilical cord pH, PCO2, and bicarbonate following uncomplicated term vaginal deliveries. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1985;151:798-800.

  7. Chamberlain G. Modern antenatal care of the fetus. Blackwell Scientific publications. 1ª ed. 1990;1933-1940.

  8. Pérez Tamayo R. Rev Mex de Anes 1979;2(1).

  9. Caballero. Gases sanguíneos fetales y asfixia perinatal. Bol Obst 2002;5(1).

  10. Spitz. Intensive care of the fetus and neonate. 2 nd ed. Mosby, 2005. En: Blackburn. Maternal, fetal and neonatal Physiology 2005;287-289.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com

Mi perfil

C?MO CITAR (Vancouver)

Ginecol Obstet Mex. 2014;82