medigraphic.com
SPANISH

Revista ADM Órgano Oficial de la Asociación Dental Mexicana

ISSN 0001-0944 (Print)
Órgano Oficial de la Asociación Dental Mexicana
  • Contents
  • View Archive
  • Information
    • General Information        
    • Directory
  • Publish
    • Instructions for authors        
    • Send manuscript
  • medigraphic.com
    • Home
    • Journals index            
    • Register / Login
  • Mi perfil

2006, Number 1

<< Back Next >>

Rev ADM 2006; 63 (1)

Comparative bacteriologic analysis of water of the urban clinics CLIMUZAC and rural CLITACO from the Odontology Academic Faculty from the University Autonomous of Zacatecas

Muñoz EJJ, Hernández DDR, Moreno GMA
Full text How to cite this article

Language: Spanish
References: 16
Page: 23-31
PDF size: 151.23 Kb.


Key words:

Water-bacteriology, comparative analysis, odontologic clinical, urban and rural.

ABSTRACT

The objective of this job was to determinate in a comparative way the bacteriology quality from the urban clinics CLIMUZAC and rural CLITACO from the Odontology Academic Faculty from the University Autonomous of Zacatecas Mexico. The work was realized by the next phases: 1. Field job, 2. Take and transport of samples, 3. Process of the samples: a). Isolation, quantification of UFC/mL, of bags (NMP/100 mL or presuntive prove. b). Determination of total bugs and fecals (confirmative prove) and bacterium identification. During the field work have found anomalies, lather of have analyzed the models we found that the majority of them but principally of the ones obtained with triplet syringe, water and hand piece, existed a determinated number of bacterium bugs (NMP/100 mL) higher that the allowed or permitted, of a similar ways have found a high number of UFC/mL corroborating the information before, with the conformative proves to total bugs and fecals, same that in the majority of the cases result positive, what indicate as a direct contamination by fecal matter to the odontologic instruments. The bacteriums that usually have isolated and identificate that in both clinics (rural, urban) were E. Coli, K. Pneumoniae, Streptococcus alfa, gamma and beta hemolytics, Proteus vulgaris, Pseudomonas fluorescens, P. aeruginosa, Staphylococcus albus, S. aureus, also like filamentus shapes Gram (-), Enterobacter aerogenes, bacillus Gram (-) non glucose fermenter. The obtained results show as that consistent with the fluid of water from the deposits to it´s expulsion that liquid goes polluting finding the higher grade during the months April-August. To have found a high grade of bacterium pollution, by diverse microorganisms including the fecal bugs, Pseudomonas, Streptococcus and Staphylococcus of a particular way in triplet syringe and hand piece, most considerate like an alert sign for immediate take solution measures and in the successive do bacteriologic control analysis periodically. For the shawed before, we conclude that mean whiles don’t take better and immediate measures and of preventive control of a periodic way of the mentioned sources, will exist patients and odontologic operators an important constant risk of take microbiologic infections including the transmission ones in a crossed way.


REFERENCES

  1. Organización Panamericana de la Salud. Guías para la calidad del agua potable. 1988; 508(3): 1-118.

  2. Organización Panamericana de la Salud. Guías para la calidad del agua potable. 1987; 506(2): 1-33.

  3. APHA-AWWA-WPCF. Métodos normalizados para el análisis de aguas potables y residuales. Ed. Díaz de Santos S.A. parte 900. 1992: 9-179.

  4. Avilés RD y col. Manual de laboratorio de microbiología sanitaria. Instituto Politécnico Nacional. México. 1983: 1-66.

  5. Treagan and William: Medical Microbiology. Laboratory procedures. 1a. Edición. W.B. Sund. Co. 1988: 5-37.

  6. Koleman A, Dowell H, Sommers W. Diagnóstico microbiológico. Texto y Atlas Color. 5ª. Ed. Editorial Médica Panamericana S.A. Argentina. 1999: 92-118.

  7. Bedmarsh SH, Eklund JK, Mills S. Infection control: Dental Water Quality. American Dental Hygienist´s Association. 1997; 20(9): 46-53.

  8. Checci, Montebugnoli L, Samaritani S. Contamination of the turbine air chamber risk of cross infection. Journal of clinical Periodontology 1998; 25(89): 607-611.

  9. Williams JF, Johnson A. Metal: Microbial contamination of dental unit waterlines journal of the American Dental Association. 1993; 124: 59-65.

  10. Secretaría de Salud: Subsecretaría de Servicios de Salud: Dirección General de Medicina Preventiva. Norma Oficial Mexicana (NOM-013-SSA2-1994) para la Prevención y Control de Enfermedades Bucales. 1995: 1-11.

  11. Walker TJ, Bradshaw JD, Bennet MA, Fulford RM, Martin VM, Marsh DP. Microbial biofilm formation and contamination of dental-unit water system in general dental practice. applied and environmental microbiology. 2000; 66(8): 3363-3367.

  12. Williams JF, Molinari JA, Andrews N. Contaminación microbiana de las líneas de agua de la unidad dental: orígenes y características. JADA 1999; 205: 33-36.

  13. Jaqueline J, Challacombe SJ. The contamination of the dental unit water supply for biofilm. JADA 1998; 129: 503-508.

  14. Quincey ED, Williams NJ, Ames LL, Igram LR, Covington JS. The air water syringe and contamination. Quintessence 1997; 5(6): 148-150.

  15. Quincey ED, Williams NJ, Ames LL, Ingram LR, Covington JS. The air water syringe: contamination and disinfection. Quintessence 1999; 9(4): 911-916.

  16. Peters E, Mc. Raw WT. Contaminación del agua de la unidad dental. JADA 1999; 9: 33-34.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com

Mi perfil

C?MO CITAR (Vancouver)

Rev ADM. 2006;63