medigraphic.com
SPANISH

Revista Mexicana de Cirugía Endoscópica

ISSN 1665-2576 (Print)
  • Contents
  • View Archive
  • Information
    • General Information        
    • Directory
  • Publish
    • Instructions for authors        
    • Send manuscript
  • medigraphic.com
    • Home
    • Journals index            
    • Register / Login
  • Mi perfil

2005, Number 2

<< Back Next >>

Rev Mex Cir Endoscop 2005; 6 (2)

Factors for to predict the conversion of the laparoscopic cholecystectomy: Five years experience in the ABC Medical Center

Cicero LA, Valdés FJA, Decanini MA, Golffier RC, Cicero LC, Cervantes CJ, Rojas RG
Full text How to cite this article

Language: Spanish
References: 17
Page: 66-73
PDF size: 167.21 Kb.


Key words:

Laparoscopic cholecystectomy, open cholecystectomy.

ABSTRACT

Laparoscopic cholecystectomy has been accepted as the treatment of choice for the surgical pathologies of the gallbladder. It is considered a basic laparoscopic procedure, nevertheless it has to be converted to an open procedure occasionally. Patients and methods: We studied 1,841 patients who underwent laparoscopic cholecytstectomy at the ABC Medical Center, from January 1, 1999 to December 31, 2003. We used the Medical Electronic File System. Results: There were 1,150 women (62.39%) and 691 men (37.56%) with a mean age of 49 years. Four hundred and eighty patients underwent emergency procedures (26.07%) and 1,316 were operated on electively (73.92%). There were 42 complications (2.28%), the most frequent were hemorrhage of the gallbladder bed and bleeding of a laparoscopic port. Fifty-one cases were converted to an open procedure (2.7%), only twelve of them due to a complication (23.52%). In the remaining 38 cases the conversion was due to the presence of adhesions and technical difficulties. The mean age in this group was 58 years. Forty patients underwent elective surgery (78.47%) and eleven underwent emergency procedures (21.56%). The mean hospital stay was 6 days for this group of patients and the average surgical time was 197 minutes. The body mass index in this group of patients was 26.72 kg/m2 (13.39 a 42.27 kg/m2). Fifty percent of these patients presented with acute cholecystitis, 30% chronic cholecystitis and the rest had associated conditions such as Mirizzi’s syndrome, choledocholithiasis, etc. The only variable related to an elevated conversion risk was the age (p = 0.01; OR = 1.30). The difference between the in-hospital stay (2.2 vs 6 days) and the difference in the surgical time were also statistically significant (p = 0.003 [OR = 1.11] and p = 0.000 [OR = 1.01]), respectively. Conclusions: The causes of conversion do not depend on the technical skills of the surgeon, in the majority of cases the conversion is due to the patient’s condition. There are no factors that can accurately predict the conversion to an open procedure.


REFERENCES

  1. Asz J. Historia del tratamiento de la litiasis biliar. Tesis UNAM. Noviembre, 2001.

  2. Reynolds W Jr. The first laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Journal of the Society of Laparoscopic Surgeons 2001; 5: 89-94.

  3. Cervantes J. El desarrollo de la cirugía laparoscópica en México. Perspectiva personal. Revista Mexicana de Cirugía Endoscópica. 2000; 1: 2-5.

  4. Cervantes J. “Historia de la Colecistectomía Laparoscópica” en Cirugía Laparoscópica y Toracoscópica. McGraw-Hill Interamericana, México, 1997: 45-50.

  5. Millar D, Schlinkert R, Schlinkert D. Robot-Assisted laparoscopic cholecystectomy: initial Mayo Clinic Scottsdale experience. Mayo Clin Proc 2004; 79: 1132-6.

  6. Kologlu M, Tutuncu T, Yuksek Y. Using a risk score for conversion from laparoscopic to open cholecystectomy in resident training. Surgery 2004; 135: 282-7.

  7. Baker R, Fischer J. Mastery of Surgery. 4th Ed. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia, PA. 1142-1163. 2001.

  8. Moore D, Feurer I, Holzman M. Long-term detrimental effect of bile duct injury on health-realted quality of life. Arch Surg 2004; 139: 476-82.

  9. Bingener J, Richards ML, Schwesinger WH, Strodel WE, Sirinek KR. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy for elderly patients: gold standard for golden years? Arch Surg 2000; 138: 531-5.

  10. Rosen M, Brody F. Predictive factors for conversion of laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Am J Surg 2002; 184: 789-94.

  11. Lam C, Yuen A, Chik B. Laparoscopic surgery for common surgical emergencies. Surg Endosc 2005; 19: 774-779.

  12. Calvete J, Sabater L, Camps B. Verdu A, Gomez-Portilla A, Martin J, Torrico MA, Flor B, Cassinello N, Lledo S. Bile duct injury during laparoscopic cholecystectomy: myth or reality of the learning curve? Surgical Endoscopy 2000; 14: 608-11.

  13. Weber D. Laparoscopic Surgery: an excellent approach in elderly patients. Arch Surg 2003; 138: 1083-88.

  14. Peng W, Sheikh Z, Nixon S. Role of laparoscopic cholecystectomy in the early management of acute gallbladder disease. Br J Surg 2005; 92: 586-91.

  15. Knight J, Mercer S, Somers S. timing of urgent laparoscopic cholecystectomy does not influence conversion rate. Br J Surg 2004; 91: 601-4.

  16. Lee H, Han S, Min S. Sex-based analysis of the outcome of laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis. Br J Surg 2005; 92: 463-66.

  17. Carbonell A, Linocurt E, Kercher K. Do patient or hospital demographics predict cholecystectomy outcomes? Surg Endosc 2005; 19: 767-73.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com

Mi perfil

C?MO CITAR (Vancouver)

Rev Mex Cir Endoscop. 2005;6