medigraphic.com
SPANISH

Revista Mexicana de Cirugía Endoscópica

ISSN 1665-2576 (Print)
  • Contents
  • View Archive
  • Information
    • General Information        
    • Directory
  • Publish
    • Instructions for authors        
    • Send manuscript
  • medigraphic.com
    • Home
    • Journals index            
    • Register / Login
  • Mi perfil

2005, Number 2

<< Back Next >>

Rev Mex Cir Endoscop 2005; 6 (2)

Laparoscopic repair of a perforated peptic ulcer

Franklin M, Gálvez HC, Villegas CO, Rodríguez CL, Treviño J, Rangel PJ
Full text How to cite this article

Language: Spanish
References: 27
Page: 74-78
PDF size: 44.77 Kb.


Key words:

Repair, laparoscopic, ulcer, peptic, perforated, patch, Graham, Texas, endosurgery, Institute.

ABSTRACT

Background: In 1990, Mouret et al reported the first successful laparoscopic repair of a perforated peptic ulcer. Since then, several series of patients successfully treated by laparoscopic surgery have been published. Apparently, the urgent treatment by minimally invasive surgery is so effective, with acceptable morbidity and mortality rates compared to conventional surgery. Patients and methods: From January 1996 to November 2004, 31 patients underwent laparoscopic repair of a perforated peptic ulcer. The employed surgical technique was primary closure of the ulcer + Graham patch. The measured variables to evaluate efficacy and safety were operating time, length of hospital stay, time to resume diet, conversion to open procedure, re-operations, morbidity and mortality. Results: The procedure was technically successful in 90% of the patients. There were neither conversions nor need to re-operate. Mortality rate was 9%. The mean length of hospital stay and time to resume diet were 8 and 4 days, respectively. Conclusions: We regard that our series contributes to support that nowadays the laparoscopic approach of this disease is a safe and effective method.


REFERENCES

  1. Lau WY, Leow CK. History of perforated duodenal and gastric ulcers. World J Surg 1997; 21: 890.

  2. Crofts TJ, Park KG et al. A randomized trial of nonoperative treatment for perforated peptic ulcer. N Engl J Med 1989; 320: 970.

  3. Memon MA, Fitzgibbons RJ. The role of minimal access surgery in the acute abdomen. Surg Clin North Am 1997; 77: 1333.

  4. Takeuchi A, Kawano T, Toda T. Laparoscopic repair for perforation of duodenal ulcer with omental patch: report of initial 6 cases. Surg Laparosc Endosc 1998; 8: 153.

  5. Costalat G, Alquier Y. Combined laparoscopic and endoscopic treatment of perforated gastroduodenal ulcer using the ligamentum teres hepatis. Surg Endosc 1995; 9: 677.

  6. Costalat G, Dravet F, Noel P. Coelioscopic treatment of perforated gastroduodenal ulcer using the ligamentum teres hepatis. Surg Endosc 1991; 5: 154.

  7. Munro WS, Bajwa F, Menzies D. Laparoscopic repair of perforated duodenal ulcers with a falcoform ligament patch. Ann Roy Coll Surg Endosc 1996; 78: 390.

  8. Mouret P, Francois Y, Vignal J. Laparoscopic treatment of perforated peptic ulcer. Br J Surg 1990; 77: 1006.

  9. Lau WY, Leung KL et al. Laparoscopic repair of perforated peptic ulcer. Br J Surg 1995; 82: 814.

  10. Matsuda M, Nishiyama M. Laparoscopic omental patch repair for perforated peptic ulcer. Ann Surg 1995; 221: 236.

  11. Thompson AR, Hall TJ, Anglin BA. Laparoscopic application of perforated ulcer: results of a selective approach. South Med J 1995; 88: 185.

  12. Champault GG. Laparoscopic treatment of perforated peptic ulcer. Endosc Surg Allied Technol 1994; 2: 117.

  13. Robertson GS, Maddern GJ. Laparoscopic repair of perforated peptic ulcers. The role of laparoscopy in generalized peritonitis. Ann Roy Coll Surg Engl 2000; 82: 6.

  14. Druart ML, Van Hee R, Etienne J et al. Laparoscopic repair of perforated duodenal ulcer. A prospective multicenter trial. Surg Endosc 1997; 11: 1017.

  15. Katkhouda N, Mavor E, Mason RJ. Laparoscopic repair of perforated duodenal ulcers: outcome and efficacy in 30 consecutive patients. Arch Surg 1999; 134: 845.

  16. Donovan AJ, Berne TV. Perforated duodenal ulcer: an alternative therapeutic plan. Arch Surg 1998; 133: 1166-1171.

  17. Matsuda M et al; Laparoscopic omental patch repair for perforated peptic ulcer. Ann Surg 1995; 221: 236-240.

  18. Siu WT, Leong HT, Li MKW. Single stitch laparoscopic omental patch repair of perforated peptic ulcer. J R Coll Surg Edinb 1997; 42: 92-94.

  19. Sebastian M, Prem Chandran et al. Helicobacter pylori infection in perforated peptic ulcer disease. Br J Surg 1995; 82: 360-362.

  20. Tokunaga Y, Hata K, Ryo J. Density of Helicobacter pylori infection in patients with peptic ulcer perforation. J Am Coll Surg 1998; 186: 659-663.

  21. Siu W, Leong H, Law B et al. Laparoscopic repair for perforated peptic ulcer. A randomized controlled trial. Ann Surg 2002; 235(3): 313-319.

  22. Kok K, Yapp S et al. Laparoscopic omental patch repair for perforated duodenal ulcer. Am Surg 1999; 65(1): 27-30.

  23. Michelet I, Agresta F. Perforated peptic ulcer: laparoscopic approach. Eur J Surg 2000; 66:405-408.

  24. Naesgaard JM, Edwin B et al; Laparoscopic and open operations in patients with perforated peptic ulcer. Eur J Surg. 1999; 165: 209-214.

  25. Bergamaschi R, Marvik R, Johnsen G et al. Open versus laparoscopic repair of perforated peptic ulcers. Surg Endosc 1999; 13:679-682.

  26. Mehendale VG, Shenoy SN, Joshi AM et al. Laparoscopic versus open surgical closure of perforated duodenal ulcers: a comparative study. Indian J Gastroenterol 2002; 21: 222-224.

  27. Lau H. Laparoscopic repair of perforated peptic ulcer. A meta-analysis. Surg Endosc 2004; 18: 1013-1021.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com

Mi perfil

C?MO CITAR (Vancouver)

Rev Mex Cir Endoscop. 2005;6