medigraphic.com
SPANISH

Revista Mexicana de Ortodoncia

ISSN 2395-9215 (Print)
Órgano Oficial de Difusión de la Facultad de Odontología de la UNAM
  • Contents
  • View Archive
  • Information
    • General Information        
    • Directory
  • Publish
    • Instructions for authors        
  • medigraphic.com
    • Home
    • Journals index            
    • Register / Login
  • Mi perfil

2014, Number 2

<< Back Next >>

Rev Mex Ortodon 2014; 2 (2)

Upper anterior intrusion with mini-implants to correct anterior deep bite in a periodontally compromised class II malocclusion. Case report

Zamudio LCE, Tavira FS
Full text How to cite this article

Language: Spanish
References: 8
Page: 107-113
PDF size: 1391.52 Kb.


Key words:

Mini-implants, intrusion, deep bite.

ABSTRACT

The use of mini-implants has revolutioned biomechanics in orthodontics with better results as far as anchorage is concerned. We have no limits when using these attachments depending only on our imagination. Anterior deep bites in severe class II malocclusion patients are a common problem that causes orthodontists to focus therapy in biomechanics to eliminate the problem by extrusion of posterior teeth or intrusion of the anterior. In this case, we decided to correct the anterior deep bite by intruding the incisors using as anchorage two mini-implants. The case was compromised by periodontal disease with moderated loss of alveolar bone so we had to choose biomechanics with a stable anchorage to achieve our goals. In the end, the patient exhibited collateral effects that were solved successfully and the deep bite was eliminated with great results and stable periodontal health.


REFERENCES

  1. Upadhyay M, Nagaraj K, Yadav S, Saxena R. Mini-implants for en masse intrusion maxillary anterior teeth in a severe class II division 2 malocclusion. J Orthod. 2008; 35: 79-89.

  2. Sada-Garralda V, Cafesse R. Enfoque ortodóntico en el tratamiento multidisciplinario de pacientes adultos. Su relación con la periodoncia. RCOE. 2003; 8 (6): 673-684.

  3. Zachrisson BU. Implicaciones clínicas de las últimas investigaciones en ortodoncia-periodoncia. Semin Orthod. 1996; 2: 4-12.

  4. Prabhu J, Cousley RR. Current products and practice: bone anchorage devices in orthodontics. J Orthod. 2006; 33 (4): 288-307.

  5. Kanomi R. Mini-implant for orthodontic anchorage. J Clin Orthod. 1997; 31: 763-767.

  6. Melsen B, Angerback N, Markestam G. Intrusion of incisors in adult patients with marginal bone loss. Am J Ortho Dentofacial Orthop. 1989; 96: 232-241.

  7. Deguchi T, Murakami T, Kuroda S, Yabuuchi T, Kamioka H, Takano-Yamamoto T. Comparison of the intrusion effects on the maxillary incisors between implant anchorage and J-Hook head gear. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2008; 133: 654-660.

  8. Ohnishi TY, Yasuda Y, Takada AK. Mini-implant for orthodontic anchorage in a deep overbite case. Angle Orthod. 2005; 75: 393-401.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com

Mi perfil

C?MO CITAR (Vancouver)

Rev Mex Ortodon. 2014;2