medigraphic.com
SPANISH

Gaceta Médica de México

ISSN 0016-3813 (Print)
  • Contents
  • View Archive
  • Information
    • General Information        
    • Directory
  • Publish
    • Instructions for authors        
  • medigraphic.com
    • Home
    • Journals index            
    • Register / Login
  • Mi perfil

2005, Number 5

<< Back Next >>

Gac Med Mex 2005; 141 (5)

Risk factors for students desertion from the UASLP School of Medicine, México.

Hernández-Mata JM, Hernández-Castro R, Nieto-Caraveo A, Hernández-Sierra JF
Full text How to cite this article

Language: Spanish
References: 11
Page: 445-448
PDF size: 35.94 Kb.


Key words:

Desertion, school of medicine, risk factors.

ABSTRACT

Objective: To obtain the profile of students that deserted from the Faculty of Medicine of the Autonomous University of San Luis Potosi, México. Design: Cases and controls nested in a cohort.
Methods: All students that voluntarily deserted between 1992 and 2002 were consulted. Each student was compared in an aleatory form with a regular student and a proper questionnaire was applied.
Results: The significantly associated factors to abandon the Faculty of Medicine were: high school of origin (OR=2.43), extraordinary exam (OR=3.13), and lack of vocation (OR=2.41).
Conclusion: The subjacent factors for not deserting from the Faculty of Medicine were: study habits, capacity for sustained effort, and tolerance to frustration.


REFERENCES

  1. McGaghie WC. Assessing readiness for medical education: evolution of the medical college admission test. JAMA 2002;288:1085-1090.

  2. ten Cate O, Smal K. Educational assessment center techniques for entrance selection in medical school. Acad Med 2002;77:737.

  3. Cohen JJ. Our compact with tomorrow’s doctors. Acad Med 2002;77:475-80.

  4. Elam CL, Stratton TD, Scott KL, Wilson JF, Lieber A. Review, deliberation, and voting: a study of selection decisions in a medical school admission committee. Teach Learn Med 2002;14:98-103.

  5. Ferguson E, James D, Madeley L. Factors associated with success in medical school: systematic review of the literature. BMJ 2002;324:952-7.

  6. Owen JA. Hayden GF, Connors AF. Can medical school admission committee members predict which applicants will choose primary care careers? Acad Med 2002;77:344-9.

  7. Moore W. BMA negotiator calls for more male medical students. BMJ 2002;324:754.

  8. Kay-Lambkin F, Pearson SA, Rolfe I. The influence of admissions variables on first year medical school performance: a study from Newcastle University, Australia. Med Educ 2002;36:154-9.

  9. Kulatunga-Moruzi C, Brooks LR, Norman GR. Validity of admissions measures in predicting performance outcomes: a comparison of those who were and were not accepted at McMaster. Teach Learn Med 2002;51:381-4.

  10. Huda N. Admission procedure as predictor of performance in medical colleges. J Pak Med Assoc 2001;51:380-1.

  11. Feigal D, Black D,Grady D, Hearst G, Fox C. Planificación y análisis de datos En: Hulley S, Cummings S.(Eds). Diseño de la investigación clínica.Barcelona: Doyma, 1993:175-190.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com

Mi perfil

C?MO CITAR (Vancouver)

Gac Med Mex. 2005;141