medigraphic.com
SPANISH

Revista Médica Electrónica

ISSN 1684-1824 (Electronic)
  • Contents
  • View Archive
  • Information
    • General Information        
    • Directory
  • Publish
    • Instructions for authors        
  • medigraphic.com
    • Home
    • Journals index            
    • Register / Login
  • Mi perfil

2014, Number 3

<< Back Next >>

Rev Méd Electrón 2014; 36 (3)

Bacterial vaginosis diagnosis. Clinical aspects and microbiologic studies

Arnold RM, González LA, Carbonell HT
Full text How to cite this article

Language: Spanish
References: 27
Page: 325-338
PDF size: 202.00 Kb.


Key words:

bacterial vaginosis, bacterial morphotypes, microbiological diagnosis.

ABSTRACT

Bacterial vaginosis is a frequent disorder of the vaginal flora in reproductive-age women, characterized by the presence of a grey unpleasant smelling secretion, due to the decrease of lactobacilli, the vaginal Ph increase and the presence of anaerobic bacteria. It is estimated that around 30 % of women aged 14-49 years have bacterial vaginosis. It is associated with perinatologic diseases including: premature membrane breaking, premature birth, low-weight newborns and inflammatory pelvic disease. The bacterial vaginosis diagnosis could be made applying clinical criteria (Amsel criteria) or by evaluation of the bacterial morphotypes found in the vaginal secretion gram through microbiological procedures created as an alternative to the clinical diagnosis that gradually replaced it. The firstly described and standardized microbiological methods were the Spiegel's and Nugent's ones. Later, Ison and Hay widened Nugent's evaluation system, including two new categories respectively, emphasizing the dominance of gram positive cocci in the vaginal ecosystem and the absence of bacteria in a smear. The most recent study on the theme is the validation of the study Vaginal Content Balance (VACOBA), showing that Nugent's and Amsel's criteria integration increases the test sensibility and specificity.


REFERENCES

  1. Fernández O, Betancourt A, Lesteiro M, Faure R. Prevalencia por diagnóstico inmunológico de Candida spp., Trichomonas vaginalis y Gardnerella vaginalis en mujeres embarazadas a nivel primario del sistema de salud. Rev Cubana Obstet Ginecol [Internet]. 2010 [citado 18 Oct 2013];36(1):66-72. Disponible en: http://scielo.sld.cu/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0138-600X2010000100009&lng=es

  2. Navarrete P, Domínguez Y, Castro M, Castro E, Zemelman R. Evaluación de los criterios de Nugent y Amsel para el diagnóstico de vaginosis bacteriana. Rev méd. Chile [Internet]. 2000 [citado 18 Oct 2013];128(7):767-71. Disponible en: http://www.scielo.cl/scielo.php?pid=S0034-98872000000700009&script=sci_arttext

  3. Allsworth JE, Peipert JF. Peipert Jeffrey F. Factor de riesgo de infecciones de transmisión sexual. Impacto de la gravedad de la vaginosis bacteriana. Am J Obstet Gynecol [Internet]. 2011 [citado [citado 18 Oct 2013];205:113.e1-6. Disponible en: http://www.intramed.net/contenidover.asp?contenidoID=72325

  4. Martínez MA, Ovalle A, Gaete AM, Lillo E, De la Fuente F. Comparación de los criterios de Nugent y Spiegel para el diagnóstico de vaginosis bacteriana y análisis de los resultados discordantes por el método de Ison y Hay. Rev Méd Chile [Internet]. 2011 [citado 21 Oct 2013];139(1):66-71. Disponible en: http://www.scielo.cl/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0034-98872011000100009

  5. Hernández F. Gardnerella vaginalis Mobiluncus en la etiología de la vaginosis bacteriana. Rev costarric cienc méd [Internet]. 1998 [citado 20 Oct 2013];19(1-2):107-16. Disponible en: http://www.scielo.sa.cr/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0253-29481998000100010&lng=es

  6. Morales A, Maritato A, de Torres RA, Ortega Soler CR. Frecuencia de disfunción vaginal (vaginosis/vaginitis) en mujeres en edad fértil, sintomáticas y asintomáticas (MEF) Obstetricia y Ginecología Latinoamericana. 2010;57(2):74-84.

  7. Cruz Lage LA, González Ferrer J, Parra Alonso LE, Martínez Martínez W, Peña Rojas L, de Valle Fernández Y. Factores de riesgo en la infección vaginal. Correo Científico Médico de Holguín [Internet]. 2011 [citado 20 Oct 2013];15(3). Disponible en: http://www.cocmed.sld.cu/no153/no153ori04.htm

  8. Betancourt Bravo A, Fernández Lima O, Villoch Cambas A, Lorenzo Hernández M, Álvarez JM. Validation of an immunologic diagnostic kit for infectious vaginitis by Trichomonas vaginalis, Candida spp. and Gardnerella vaginalis. Diagnostic Microbiology and Infectious Disease. 2009;63(3):257-60. Citado en PubMed: PMID: 19216938.

  9. Perazzi BE, Menghi CI, Coppolillo EF, Gatta C, Cora Eliseth M. Prevalence and comparison of diagnostic methods for Trichomonas vaginalis in pregnant woman in Argentina. Korean J Parasitology [Internet]. 2010 [citado 20 Oct 2013];48(1):61-5. Disponible en: http://synapse.koreamed.org/search.php?where=aview&id=10.3347/kjp.2010.48.1.61&code=0066KJP&vmode=FULL

  10. McClelland RS, Richardson BA, Hassan WM, Graham SM, Kiarie J, Baeten JM, et al. A prospective study of vaginal bacterial flora and other risk factors for vulvovaginal candidiasis. J Infect Dis. 2009; 199(12):1883-90. Citado en Pubmed; PMID: 19456235.

  11. Rodríguez Domínguez M, Sanbonmatsu S, Salinas J, Alonso R, Gutiérrez J, Galá JC. Diagnóstico microbiológico de las infecciones por Chlamydia spp. y especies relacionadas. Enferm Infecc Microbiol Clin [Internet]. 2013 [citado 20 Oc 2013];xxx(xx). Disponible en: http://ac.els-cdn.com/S0213005X13000244/1-s2.0- S0213005X13000244-main.pdf?_tid=1e269dae-c17d-11e3-89d4-00000aab0f6c&acdnat=1397223067_10959cd9fd61a754ead13dc3a6fc2b87

  12. Brandie T, Haggerty C. Management of Chlamydia trachomatis genital tract infection: screening and treatment challenges. Infect Drug Resist. 2011;4:19-29. Disponible en: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3108753/pdf/idr-4-019.pdf

  13. Marrazzo JM, Thomas KK, Fiedler TL, Ringwood K, Fredricks DN. Relation ship of specific vaginal bacteria and bacterial vaginosis treatment failure in women who have sex with women. Ann Intern Med. 2008;149(1):130. Citado en PubMed; PMID: 18591634.

  14. Brotman RM, Ravel J, Cone RA, Zenilman JM. Rapid fluctuation of the vaginal microbiota measured by Gram stain analysis. Sex Transm Infect. 2010;86(4):297-302. Citado en PubMed; PMID: 20660593.

  15. Venegas G, Boggiano G, Castro E. Prevalencia de vaginosis bacteriana en trabajadoras sexuales chilenas. Rev Panam Salud Pública [Internet]. 2011 [citado 20 Oct 2013];30(1):46-50. Disponible en: http://www.scielosp.org/pdf/rpsp/v30n1/v30n1a07.pdf

  16. Maritato A, Basso B, Belchior S, Castillo M, De Mier C, Di Bartolomeo S, et al. Manual de procedimientos Balance del contenido vaginal (BACOVA). Argentina: Fundación Bioquímica Argentina; 2012.

  17. Lillo E, Lizama S, Medel J, Martínez M. Diagnóstico de vaginosis bacteriana en un consultorio de planificación familiar de la Región Metropolitana, Chile. Rev Chilena Infectol [Internet]. 2010 [citado 20 Oct 2013];27(3):199-203. Disponible en: http://www.scielo.cl/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0716-10182010000300002

  18. Díaz Gomez, J. Vaginosis bacteriana. CES Medicina [Internet]. 2012 [citado 20 Oct 2013];8(1):79-103. Disponible en: http://revistas.ces.edu.co/index.php/medicina/article/view/2271

  19. Cauci S, Flatow Culhane J, Di Santolo M, McCollum K. Among pregnant women with bacterial vaginosis, he hydrolytic enzymes sialidase and prolidase are positively associated with interleukin-1beta. Am J Obstet Gynecol [Internet]. 2008 [citado 20 Oc 2013];198:132. e1-7. Dsiponible en: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0002937807006746

  20. Llop Hernández A, Valdés Dapena Ma, Zuaso Silva J. Microbiología y parasitología médica. Tomo I. Cap 25. La Habana: ECIMED; 2009. p. 244-5.

  21. Venegas G, Boggiano G, Castro E. Prevalencia de vaginosis bacteriana en trabajadoras sexuales chilenas. Rev Panam Salud Pública. 2011;30(1):46-50. Citado en PubMed; PMID: 65053525.

  22. Van Der Pol B, Kwok C, Pierre-Louis B, Rinaldi A, Salata RA, Chen PL, et al. Trichomonas vaginalis infection and human immunodeficiency virus acquisition in African women. J Infect Dis. 2011;197(4):548-54. Citado en Pubmed; PMID: 18275275.

  23. Fosch S, Fogolín N, Azzaroni E, Pairetti N, Dana L, Minacori H, et al. Vulvovaginitis: correlación con factores predisponentes, aspectos clínicos y estudios microbiológicos.Rev argent microbiol [Internet]. 2006;38(4):202-05. Citado en PubMed; PMID: 17370572.

  24. Spiegel CA, Davick P, Totten PA, Chen KC, Eschenach DA, Amsel R. Nonspecific vaginitis. Diagnostic and microbial criteria and epidemiologic associations. Am J Med. 1983;74:14-22. Citado en PubMed; PMID: 6607521.

  25. Nugent P, Krohn A, Hillier L. Reliability of diagnosing bacterial vaginosis is improved by a standardized method of Gram stain interpretation. J Clin Microbiol. 1991;29(2):297-301. Citado en PubMed; PMID: 1706728.

  26. Ison CA, Hay PE. Validation of a simplified grading of Gram stained vaginal smears for use in genitourinary medicine clinics. Sex Transm Infect. 2002;78(6):413-5. Citado en PubMed; PMID: 12473800.

  27. Keane FE, Maw R, Pritchard C, Ison CA. Methods employed by genitourinary medicine clinics in the United Kingdom to diagnose bacterial vaginosis. Sex Transm Infect. 2010;81(2):155-7. Citado en PubMed; PMID: 15800095.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com

Mi perfil

C?MO CITAR (Vancouver)

Rev Méd Electrón. 2014;36