Herrera-Gómez F, Hamui-Sutton A

Language: Spanish
References: 15
Page: 73-76
PDF size: 285.10 Kb.

ABSTRACT

Objective: describe the negotiation on economic aspects of reconstituted couples. Material and methods: qualitative and interpretative study. Under the assumption that remarried couples are more vulnerable for failure, as they take for granted the roles of gender and of each partner, which hinders communication, negotiation and agreements in the family. The following hypothesis was raised: “the lack of negotiation and agreements on the role of spouses in the reconstituted couple influences family breakdown”. The selection criteria were: remarried couples, patients of the issste (Institute of Security and Social Services for the State Workers) “Gustavo A Madero” Family Medicine Clinic (fmc), in Mexico City. The sampling was to convenience, three couples, that means, six spouses of reconstituted families were included. It was used, as an instrument, an interview guide considering five dimensions of the study: negotiation of economic arrangements, child care, work home, communication in the couple and sexuality. Semi-structured audio-taped interviews were conducted under informed consent. Results: in couples 1 and 2 there was no dialogue and proper negotiation about family economy, which caused difficulty and tension between spouses, in addition, the distribution of economic resources was based on the needs. In couple 3, dialogue and economic cooperation were more equitable and based on the planning and organization of the primary and secondary needs, favoring the integration and a more stable family dynamics. Conclusions: difficulty in communication and the implicit functions of the gender role, do not allow negotiation, planning or organization of the family, which is a risk factor for the integration and family health.

REFERENCES

1. Luna Santos S. Recomposición familiar en México. CEPAL. Notas de Población. 2007;82:5-30.

2. Garrido Garduño C. Vida en pareja: un asunto a negociar. Rev. Enseñanza e Investigación en Psicología. 2007:7(12):385-96.

3. Walters Pacheco KZ. Significado de familia reconstituida. Rev. Psicología Iberoamericana. 2006;4(2):16-27.

4. Ariza M, Oliveira O. Familias en transición y marcos conceptuales en redefinición. Papeles de Población. 2001;28:9-39.

5. Téllez Infante A, Martínez Guiaro JE, coordinadores. Sexualidad, género y cambios de roles y nuevos modelos de familia. España: sieg, 2008.

6. Instituto Nacional de las Mujeres, Instituto Nacional de Estadística, Geografía e Informática. Encuesta Nacional sobre la Dinámica de las Relaciones en los Hogares (endireh) [Internet]. México, d.f: 2003. Disponible en: http://www.inegi.org.mx/est/contenidos/proyectos/ encuestas/hogares/especiales/endireh/

7. Rivas M. Parentalidad en las familias reconstituidas. Rev. Portularia. 2012;2(41):1578-85.

8. González Montoya CS. Organizaciones familiares diferentes. Rev. Electrónica de Psicología Iztacala. 2005;8(3):23-8.

9. Navarro J. Las familias reconstituidas, parejas en situaciones especiales. Barcelona: Paidós, 2000.

10. Espinar Fellmann I. Familias reconstituidas: nuevas estructuras familiares. Rev. Clínica y Salud. 2003;14(3):301-32.

11. Garrido Garduño A. La vida en pareja: un asunto a negociar. Rev. Enseñanza e Investigación en Psicología. 2007;12(2):385-96.

12. Prado Maillard E. Negociación en la pareja. México: Paidós, 2003.

13. Minuchin S. El arte de la terapia familiar. México: Paidós, 2008.

14. Estrada, I. El ciclo vital de la familia. México: Grijalbo, 2003.

15. Walters Pacheco KZ. Relaciones de pareja en la familia reconstituida. Rev. Psicología Científica. 2008:10(8);56-62.