medigraphic.com
SPANISH

Revista Mexicana de Periodontología

ISSN 2007-4360 (Print)
Asociación Mexicana de Periodontología, Colegio de Periodoncistas A.C
  • Contents
  • View Archive
  • Information
    • General Information        
    • Directory
  • Publish
    • Instructions for authors        
  • medigraphic.com
    • Home
    • Journals index            
    • Register / Login
  • Mi perfil

2013, Number 3

<< Back Next >>

Rev Mex Periodontol 2013; 4 (3)

Molar root fusion First place winner in the poster contest at the Morelia AMP 2013 Congress

Busto RBP, Flores OJC, Fayad HS
Full text How to cite this article

Language: Spanish
References: 10
Page: 101-105
PDF size: 308.86 Kb.


Key words:

Root fusion, anatomy, molars, radiographic examination.

ABSTRACT

Introduction: Molars with fused roots have less root attachment area compared with teeth with divergent roots and therefore more susceptible to be mobile as well as an unfavorable crown-root ratio. The purpose of this study is to determine the prevalence and distribution of molars with fused roots. Materials and methods: Radiographic series from 1,063 patients of the postgraduate program at the Universidad Intercontinental were evaluated to determine which molars had root fusion. Results: The percentage of all molars with fused roots was 46% (3,086) from a total of 6,724 molars studied. Root fusion was found more frequently in maxillary molars (58%) than mandibular molars (33%). Root fusion was less common in 1st molars, in both jaws. It occurred in almost equal numbers in corresponding molars of opposite sides, approaching bilateral symmetry. Conclusion: Data obtained suggests that root fusion is a common finding. Root morphology is a factor to be considered during the diagnosis, prognosis and treatment plan as fused or tapered roots in periodontally affected molars may manifest mobility and compromise crown root ratio. The number, length, shape and spread of molar roots affect their anchorage in the jaw bone to a significant degree and are important factors in determining prognosis of a tooth.


REFERENCES

  1. Carranza F Jr, Jolkovski D. Current status of periodontal therapy for furcation involvements. Dent Clin North Am. 1991; 35: 555-570.

  2. Larato D. Furcation involvements, incidence and distribution. J Periodontol. 1970; 41: 499-501.

  3. Larato D. Some anatomical factors related to furcations involvements. J Periodontol. 1975; 46: 608-609.

  4. Bissada N, Abdelmalek R. Incidence of cervical enamel projections and its relation to furcation involvement in Egyptian skulls. J Periodontol. 1973; 44: 583-585.

  5. Bower R. Furcation morphology relative to periodontal treatment. Furcation root surface anatomy. J Periodontol. 1979; 50: 366-374.

  6. Gher M, Vernino A. Root morphology clinical significance in pathogenesis and treatment of periodontal disease. JADA. 1980; 101: 627-634.

  7. Ross F, Evanchik P. Root fusion in molars: incidence and sex linkage. J Periodontol. 1981; 52: 663-667.

  8. Ross I, Thompson R. A long term study of root retention in the treatment of maxillary molars with furcation involvent. J Periodontol. 1978; 49: 238-244.

  9. Ross I. The functional environment of the teeth. J Am Dent Assoc. 1961; 63: 628-625.

  10. Hou G, Tsai C. Relationship between molar root fusion and localized Periodontitis. J Periodontol. 1997; 68: 313-319.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com

Mi perfil

C?MO CITAR (Vancouver)

Rev Mex Periodontol. 2013;4