medigraphic.com
SPANISH

MediSur

ISSN 1727-897X (Electronic)
  • Contents
  • View Archive
  • Information
    • General Information        
    • Directory
  • Publish
    • Instructions for authors        
  • medigraphic.com
    • Home
    • Journals index            
    • Register / Login
  • Mi perfil

2014, Number 3

<< Back Next >>

Medisur 2014; 12 (3)

Primary Piggyback: an alternative surgical treatment for patients with high hypermetropia. A case report

Milanés AAR, Molina CK, González DA
Full text How to cite this article

Language: Spanish
References: 18
Page: 495-500
PDF size: 159.99 Kb.


Key words:

hypermetropia, lens implantation, intraocular.

ABSTRACT

Hypermetropia is the most common refractive disorder in our country. Finding the best procedure to correct this defect is a serious problem for the ophthalmologist and the patient, especially those with severe defects. The case of a 45-year-old patient with a history of high hypermetropia in both eyes is presented. He is an agricultural worker who had serious difficulties adapting to the lenses as they were too heavy and caused him blurry vision, leading to their frequent change. After analyzing the different ways to correct his defect, it was decided to implant two (piggyback) intraocular lenses, which resulted in increased visual acuity and elimination of the refractive disorder without occurrence of intraoperative and postoperative complications. High hypermetropia is uncommon in hypermetropic patients, thus this technique is not frequently used in our setting, which lead to the presentation of this case.


REFERENCES

  1. Andújar Coba P, Méndez Duque de Estrada AM, Barroso Lorenzo R, Ruiz Rodríguez Y, Curbelo Cunilll L. Sorpresa refractiva. In: Río Torres M, Capote Cabrera A, Padilla González CM, Eguía Martínez F, Hernández Silva JR. Oftalmología. Criterios y tendencias actuales. La Habana: Editorial Ciencias Médicas; 2009. p. 285-91.

  2. Obuchowska I, Mariak Z. Sir Harold Ridley. The creator of modern cataract surgery. Klin Oczna. 2005 ; 107 (4-6): 382-4.

  3. Wladis EJ, Gewirtz MB, Guo S. Cataract Surgery in the Small Adult Eye. Surv Ophthalmol. 2006 ; 51 (2): 153-61.

  4. Wook J, Suk W, Jeung Y, Won K. Cataract Surgery Using Piggyback Method in Patient with Nanophthalmos. J Korean Ophthalmol Soc. 2010 ; 51 (7): 1016-22.

  5. Alfonso JF, Fernández-Vega L, Baamonde MB. Secondary diffractive bifocal piggyback intraocular lens implantation. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2006 ; 32 (11): 1938-43.

  6. Akaishi L, Tzelikis P. Piggy back. In: Nicoli C, Villar Kuri J, editors. El libro del cristalino de las Américas. Brasilia: Livraria Santos; 2007. p. 345-50.

  7. Eguías Martínez F, Río Torres M, Capote Cabrera A. Sorpresa refractiva tras cirugía del cristalino. In: Manual de diagnóstico y tratamiento en Oftalmología. La Habana: Editorial Ciencias Médicas; 2010. p. 247-51.

  8. Latkany RA, Chokshi AR, Speaker MG, Abramson J, Soloway BD, Guopei Y, et al. Intraocular lens calculations after refractive surgery. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2005 ; 31: 562-70.

  9. Baumeister M, Kohnen T. Scheimpflug measurement of intraocular lens position after piggy back implantation of foldable intraocular lenses in eyes with high hyperopia. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2006 ; 32 (12): 2098-104.

  10. Holladay JT, Gills JP, Leidlein J, Cherchio M. Achieving emmetropia in extremely short eyes with two piggyback posterior chamber intraocular lenses. Ophthalmology. 1996 ; 103 (7): 1118-23.

  11. Gayton JL. Maximizing results. Cataract Refract Surg. 1998 ; 22: 139-48.

  12. Gills JP. Cataract surgery the state of the art. Thorofare NJ: Slack Inc. Cataract Refract Surg. 2000 ; 24: 189.

  13. Javitt JC, Wang F, West SK. Blindness due to cataract: epidemiology and prevention. Annu Rev Public Health. 1996 ; 17: 159-77.

  14. Iwase T, Tanaka N. Elevated intraocular pressure in secondary piggyback intraocular lens implantation. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2005 ; 31 (9): 1821-3.

  15. Ruíz Rodríguez Y, Miranda Hernández M, Ibarra Ávila R, Hernández Silva JR, Pérez Candelaria E, Mena Grandales K. Piggy back en el tratamiento de la sorpresa refractiva hipermetrópica. Rev Cubana Oftalmol [revista en Internet]. 2011 [ cited 18 Ene 2013 ] ; 24 (1): [aprox. 12p]. Available from: http://www.revoftalmologia.sld.cu/index.php/oftal mologia/article/view/21/html_14.

  16. Eleftheriadis H, Marcantonio J, Duncan G, Liu C. Interlenticular opacification in piggy back AcrySof intraocular lenses: explantation technique and laboratory investigations. Br J Ophthalmol. 2001 ; 85 (7): 830-6.

  17. Park S, Ressiniotis T, Wood C. Intraocular lens pupillary capture after neodymium:YAG laser treatment of interlenticular opacification of posterior chamber piggyback intraocular lenses. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2006 ; 32 (6): 1056-8.

  18. Montero Díaz E, Capote Cabrera A, Pérez Candelaria E, Santiesteban García I, Pedroso Llanes A, Rodríguez Suárez B. Resultados del implante múltiple de lentes intraoculares en la cirugía de catarata en el Instituto Cubano de Oftalmología Ramón Pando Ferrer. Rev Cubana Oftalmol [revista en Internet]. 2010 [ cited 23 Feb 2011 ] ; 23 (1): [aprox. 11p]. Available from: http://www.bvs.sld.cu/revistas/oft/vol23_01_10/of t08110.htm.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com

Mi perfil

C?MO CITAR (Vancouver)

Medisur. 2014;12