Jiménez-Uribe AG, López-Sandoval JJ, González-Gutiérrez M, Pérez-De la Torre LM, Sánchez-Vergara A, Aréchiga-Andrade MC, Alcalá-Padilla MG

Language: Spanish
References: 9
Page: 225-228
PDF size: 524.76 Kb.

ABSTRACT

Introduction. Premature newborn's early nutrition such as parenteral, enteral or mixed nutrition (enteral + parenteral), manages to cover the nutritional need and obtain the final objective of optimal growth and development during the hospitalization having an effect on their quality of life.
Objetive. To find out the relation between the type of enteral, parenteral or mixed nutrition and premature newborn's nutritional evolution in the Civil Hospital of Guadalajara Fray Antonio Alcalde Intensive Care Unit. From August 2013 to January 2014.
Material y Methods. The study was done in the unit of neonatal intensive care unit in the Civil Hospital of Guadalajara. 58 premature newborns that were admitted in said unit received enteral, parenteral or mixed (enteral + parenteral) nutrition. The variables considered were: gender, gestational age, weight at admittance and discharge, size at admittance and growth speed. A database in SPSS 14 was done. The variables were analyzed through percentage method. As exclusion methods, were considered the decease or prematures without completing the measuring tool.
Results. Predominatly males (51.7%), and born by c-section (58.6%), the frequency of patients receiving enteral nutrition was 37.9% and 53.5 received mixed nutritional support, the difference between birth weight with GEG decreased 3.4% at discharge weight, AEG increased in 0.9% at discharge, PEG increased 2.5% at discharge, the reason of discharge was improvement in 75.9%.

REFERENCES

1. 1.Hubner G. M et al; “estrategias Para Mejorar La Sobrevida Del Prematuro Extremo”; Rev Chil Pediatr; 2009(80)6; 2011: 551-9.

2. 2.Perdigón, G; Villaseñor, S; Fernández C; La mortalidad neonatal y post neonatal en México, 1980- 2005.Dirección de Planeación, Hospital Infantil de México Federico Gómez, México, D. F., México.

3. 3.Mezquita M; et al. Estado nutricional en la unidad de Cuidados Intensivos Pediátricos: influye sobre la morbi-mortalidad?; Pediatr. (Asunción); 2008 (35)2; 2010: 88-94

4. 4.Joa, M. T; et al; “Influence of the type of nutrition in the clinical course of the newborn operated due to digestive malformations”; MEDISAN 2010(14)6; 2011:781-788

5. 5.Velázquez, Q. N; et al.; Recién nacidos con bajo peso; causas, problemas y perspectivas a futuro; Bol. Med. Hosp. Infant. Mex; 2004 (61)1; 2010: 73-86.

6. 6.Udaeta, ME; et al. Alimentación enteral en el recién nacido pretérmino y de término con bajo peso: estado actual en México” Gac Méd Méx; 2005(141)4; 2011:283-290.

7. 7.González H. A; Pupo P. L; Estado de la calidad de los cuidados nutricionales en una unidad de terapia intensiva neonatal; Rev. Cubana Aliment Nutr; Cuba; 2008; (18)1; 2010:53-71

8. 8.Ariztia, A; et al. “Alimentación del prematuro”; Rev. Chil. Pediatr; 2004;(75)2; 2011:305-311.

9. 9.Estándares clínicos longitudinales para velocidad de crecimiento para altura y peso para los niños norteamericanos. J Peditric 1985; 107:317-29.