medigraphic.com
SPANISH

Revista de Investigación Clínica

Instituto Nacional de Ciencias Médicas y Nutrición Salvador Zubirán
  • Contents
  • View Archive
  • Information
    • General Information        
    • Directory
  • Publish
    • Instructions for authors        
  • medigraphic.com
    • Home
    • Journals index            
    • Register / Login
  • Mi perfil

2014, Number 1

<< Back Next >>

Rev Invest Clin 2014; 66 (1)

Legality and age influence end of life decisions in Mexican physicians

Loria A, Villarreal-Garza C, Sifuentes E, Lisker R
Full text How to cite this article

Language: English
References: 13
Page: 59-64
PDF size: 143.09 Kb.


Key words:

Physician assisted death, Therapy withdrawal, Mercy killing, Mexico, Medical students and residents.

ABSTRACT

Purpose. To test in two groups of physicians-in-training a simplified questionnaire exploring their acceptance of Physician Assisted Death (PAD), Therapy Withdrawal upon family request (WD), and Personalized PAD (PPAD) on whether the participant would seek PAD for him/herself. Material and methods. A 4-item questionnaire was answered by 212 residents in different stages of training and grouped as beginners (1st and 3d year internal medicine residents, n = 76) and advanced (5th to 8th year residents of different internal medicine or oncology subspecialties, n = 136). The response options to the PAD and WD questions included a conditioned yes (CYes) dealing with legalization of PAD or the existence of a patient’s previous written agreement to WD. Results. Beginners had significantly more Yes plus C-Yes answers than advanced for questions regarding PAD (82 vs. 55%), WD (95 vs. 75%) and PPAD (76 vs. 56%). The importance of legal aspects implied in the conditioned answers can be seen in two findings: a) A sizable 29% of participants conditioned their Yes answers for both questions whereas only 9% gave an unconditioned Yes to both. b) A cross-classification of the PAD and WD answers showed that 13% of participants reversed their No in PAD to C-Yes in WD. Conclusions. Our simplified questionnaire operated well and was able to confirm the increase in acceptance of PAD and WD by young Mexican physicians, and the need of legislation regarding end of life decisions in our country.


REFERENCES

  1. Lisker R, Alvarez del Rio A, Villa A, Carnevale A. Physicianassisted death. Opinions of a sample of Mexican physicians. Arch Med Res 2008; 39: 452-8.

  2. Loria A, Villarreal-Garza C, Sifuentes E, Lisker R. Physician-assisted death. Opinions of Mexican medical students and residents. Accepted for publication in the Arch Med Res. 2013; 44:475-8

  3. Hernández JL, Arriaga A, Cortés G. [Survey of physician’s attitudes before the terminal patient] Encuesta de actitudes médicas ante el paciente terminal. Rev Invest Clin 1997; 40: 497-500.

  4. García-Romero H. [Less suffering as a factor of dignified death] Un menor sufrimiento, factor de muerte digna. In: Cano-Valle F, Díaz E, Maldonado E (coords.) [Euthanasia: legal, philosophical, medical and religious aspects] Eutanasia, aspectos jurídicos, filosóficos, médicos y religiosos. Serie Estudios Jurídicos No. 22. México, D.F.: Instituto de Investigaciones Jurídicas, UNAM; 2001, p. 247-61.

  5. Bistre S. New legislation on palliative care and pain in Mexico. J Pain Palliative Care Pharmacother 2009; 23: 419-25.

  6. Macke D, Park W, Rodrigo J, Vinacur D. [Euthanasia and assissted suicide: survey of CEMIC physicians] Eutanasia y suicidio asistido: encuesta en médicos del CEMIC. Rev Oncol Clin 2002; 7: 708-13.

  7. [Spanish survey of the Centro de Investigaciones Sociológicas] Encuesta en España del Centro de Investigaciones Sociológicas. [Attitudes and opinions of physicians on euthanasia] Actitudes y opiniones de los médicos ante la eutanasia. Estudio No. 2,451; abril-mayo 2002. El País. Octubre 14, 2003.

  8. Van Der Mass PJ, Van Delden JJ, Pijnenborg I, Looman CW. Euthanasia and other medical decisions concerning the end of life. Lancet 1991; 338: 669-74.

  9. Chin AE, Hedberg K, Higginson GK, Fleming DW. Legalized physician-assisted suicide in Oregon – the first year’s experience. N Engl J Med 1999; 340: 577-83.

  10. Gonçalves JA. Attitudes toward end-of-life situations other than euthanasia and assisted suicide among Portuguese oncologists. Support Care Cancer 2010; 18(10): 1271-7.

  11. Mayda AS, Ozkara E, Corapçioglu F. Attitudes of oncologists toward euthanasia in Turkey. Palliat Support Care 2005; 3(3): 221-5.

  12. Yun YH, Han KH, Park S, Park BW, Cho CH, Kim S, et al. Attitudes of cancer patients, family caregivers, oncologists and members of the general public toward critical interventions at the end of life of terminally ill patients. CMAJ 2011; 183(10): E673-E679.

  13. Parker MH, Cartwright CM, Williams GM. Impact of specialty on attitudes of Australian medical practitioners to end-of-life decisions. Med J Aust 2008; 188(8): 450-6.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com

Mi perfil

C?MO CITAR (Vancouver)

Rev Invest Clin. 2014;66