medigraphic.com
SPANISH

Revista Mexicana de Cirugía Pediátrica

  • Contents
  • View Archive
  • Information
    • General Information        
    • Directory
  • Publish
    • Instructions for authors        
  • medigraphic.com
    • Home
    • Journals index            
    • Register / Login
  • Mi perfil

2014, Number 1

<< Back Next >>

Rev Mex Cir Pediatr 2014; 18 (1)

Laparoscopic splenectomy. report of a different approach

Alba PR
Full text How to cite this article

Language: Spanish
References: 13
Page: 19-26
PDF size: 200.42 Kb.


Key words:

Laparoscopic splenectomy, Ligasure™Bleeding.

ABSTRACT

Introduction: Laparoscopic splenectomy (LS) has become the standard procedure for most cases of splenectomy. Bleeding is the main complication and cause of conversion. We present our experience with an anterior approach and the Ligasure™ to discuss its advantages as a safe blood vessel sealing system, with a better mobilization and visualization of the splenic hilum.
Material and Methods: During a 3 years period, from January 2009 to January 2012, we preformed 12 consecutive LS and Ligasure™ anterior approach in our center. We conducted a systematic review of all patients undergoing LS with Ligasure™ to achieve vascular control and those with an anterior approach. We evaluated the benefits and results.
Results: Twelve LS were performed. Eleven of these patients had Idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura (ITP), and one patient had hereditary spherocytosis. The average blood loss was 70 ml (range, 50-110), surgical time was 80 minutes (range, 70-120). No postoperative complications.
Discussion: The literature review revealed eight studies with 231 cases in which the Ligasure™ was used to perform LS. A significant reduction in operating time (average 102 minutes) and the loss of intra-abdominal blood (66ml) was observed with the Ligasure™ compared with cutting staples.
Conclusions: Using Ligasure™ and anterior approach results in a time saving and safe technique plus low trans-surgical bleeding, low need for transfusion, minimal complications and very low conversion rate.


REFERENCES

  1. 1." Aydin C, Kayaalp C, Olmez A, Tatli F, Kirimlioglu V. Laparoscopic splenectomy with a vessel sealing device. Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol. 2008;17(5):308–312. 2." Misawa T, Yoshida K, Iida T, et al. Minimizing intraopera-tive bleeding using a vessel sealing system and splenic hilum hanging maneuver in laparoscopic splenectomy. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg. 2009;16(6):786– 791. 3." Romano F, Gelmini R, Caprotti R, et al. Laparoscopic splenectomy: Ligasure versus Endo GIA: a comparative study. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2007;17(6):763–767. 4." Delaitre B, Champault G, Barrat C, et al. Laparoscopic sple- nectomy for haematologic disease: study of 275 cases. French Society of Laparoscopic Surgery. Ann Chir. 2000;125(6):522– 529.

  2. Gelmini R, Romano F, Quaranta N, et al. Sutureless and stapleless laparoscopic splenectomy using radiofrequency: LigaSure device. Surg Endoc. 2006;20(6):991–994.

  3. Winslow ER, Brunt LM. Perioperative outcome of laparoscopic versus open splenectomy: a meta-analysis with an emphasis on complication. Surgery. 2003;134(4):647–653.

  4. 7." Kennedy JS, Stranahan PL, Taylor KD, Chandler JG. High burst strength, feedback controlled bipolar vessel sealing. Surg Endosc. 1998;12(6): 876–878.

  5. 8." Klioze SD, Poppaas DP, Rooke CT, Choma TJ, Schlossberg SM. Development and initial application of a real time thermal control system for laser tissue welding. J Urol. 1994;152:744 –748.

  6. 9." Phillips CK, Hruby GW, Durak E, et al. Tissue response to surgical energy devices. Urology. 2008;71(4):744–748"

  7. Matthews BD, Pratt BL, Backus CL, et al. Effectiveness of the ultrasonic coagulation shears, Ligasure vessel sealer and surgical clips application in biliary surgery: a comparative analysis. Am Surg. 2001;67(9):901–906.

  8. Yuney E, Hobek A, Keskin M, Yilmaz O, Kamali S, Oktay C. Laparoscopic splenectomy and Ligasure. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2005;15:212–215.

  9. Canda AE, Ozsay Y, Yuksel S. Laparoscopic splenectomy using Ligasure in benign hematologic diseases. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2009;19(1):69–71.

  10. Wang GY, Liu YH, Lu GY, Liu K, Zhang W, Li N, Tan YQ. The value of spleen subpedicle two steps, severance with Ligasure in laparoscopic splenectomy. Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2008;46(19):1457–1459.

  11. Barbaros U, Dinccag A, Deveci U, et al. Use of electrothermal vessel sealing with Ligasure device during laparoscopic splenectomy. Acta Chir Belg. 2007;107(2):162–165.

  12. Schaarschmidt K, Kolberg-Schwerdt A, Lempe M, Saxena A. Ultrasonic shear coagulation of main hilar vessels. A 4 year experience of 23 pediatric laparoscopic splenectomies without staples. J Paediatr Surg. 2002;37(4):614– 616.

  13. Bell RL, Reinhardt KE, Cho E, Flowers JL. A 10 year single institution experience with laparoscopic splenectomy. JSJS. 2005; 9(2):163–168.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com

Mi perfil

C?MO CITAR (Vancouver)

Rev Mex Cir Pediatr. 2014;18