medigraphic.com
Boletín Clínico de la Asociación Médica del Hospital Infantil del Estado de Sonora

2014, Number 2

<< Back Next >>

Bol Clin Hosp Infant Edo Son 2014; 31 (2)

Risk Factors by Cesarean Sectionin Women Attended at the Sonora State Integrated Women Hospital

López-Saiz LE, Rojo-Quiñonez AR, López-Saiz CM

Language: Spanish
References: 18
Page: 96-100
PDF size: 279.48 Kb.


ABSTRACT

Methods: We carried out an observational, prospective, descriptive study; it was conducted at HIMES Hospital. Patients with 36 or more weeks of pregnancy attending the emergency room at the hospital were selected for this study. The riskfactors considered were: gestational age, maternal age, number of previous pregnancies, Bishop score, and and weight gain.
Results: 326 patients were included in this study, 25% of delivery route were by cesarean section. For patients who gained more weight than recommended, the risk for cesarean section increases in 11.49%. Regarding Bishop score, when it is lower than 6, it is associated with a 60% probability for cesarean section (p‹.05).Gestationa l age of 41 weeks or higher increases cesarean sectionrate up to 39.72%. Respecting maternal age, teen patients, 15 years or younger, have a high rate of 60%. Nulliparous patients had a 34% of cesarean rate.
Conclusions: We concluded that a low Bishop score, a gestational age of 41 weeks or higher, teenager of 15 years or younger, nulliparous patients and a weight gain higher than recommended to the body mass index, are risk factors for cesarean section.


REFERENCES

  1. 1.- Guía de Práctica Clínica para la Reducción de la Frecuencia de Operación Cesárea México: Instituto Mexicano del Seguro social; 2014.

  2. 2.- Muñoz JM, Rosales E, Domínguez G. Operación cesárea:¿indicación justificante o preocupación justificada? GinecolObstetMex. 2011;79(2):67-74.

  3. 3.- Flores L, González GJ, Trejo J, López G, Cabrera CE, Campos A,et al. Factores de riesgo en la operación cesárea. GinecolObstetMex. 2008;76(7): 392-7.

  4. 4.- Dietz HP, Lanzarone V, Simpson M. Predicting operative delivery. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2006;27:409-15.

  5. 5.- Atención de la mujer durante el embarazo, parto y puerperio y del recién nacido. Criterios y procedimientos para la prestación del servicio.Norma Oficial Mexicana NOM-007-SSA2-1993. Diario Oficial de la Federación 31 de octubre de 1994.

  6. 6.- De la Calle FM, Armijo L, Martín B, Sancha N, Magdaleno D, Omeñaca F,et al. Sobrepeso y obesidad pregestacional como factor de riesgo para cesárea y complicaciones perinatales. RevChilObstetGinecol. 2009;74(4): 233-8.

  7. 7.- Rasmussen KM, Catalano PM, Yaktine A. New guidelines for weight gain during pregnancy: what obst etrician/ gynecologists should know. CurrOpinObstetGynec. 2009;21(6):521–6.

  8. 8.- Kominiarek MA, Veldhuisen PV, Hibbard J,Landy H, Haberman S, Learman L, et al. The maternal body mass index: a strong association with delivery route. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2010;203:264.e1-7.

  9. 9.- Vrouenraets F, Roumen J, Dehing C, Van Den E, Aarts M, Scheve E. Bishop score and risk of cesarean delivery after induction of labor in nulliparous women. ObstetGynecol2005;105(4):690-7.

  10. 10.- DeVader SR, Neeley HL, Myles TD, Leet TL. Evaluation of Gestational Weight Gain Guidelines for Women with Normal Prepregnancy Body Mass Index. Obstet Gynecol. 2007;110(4):745-51.

  11. 11.- Ehrental DB, Jiang X, Strobino DM. Labor Induction and the Risk of a Cesarean Delivery Among Nulliparous Women at term. Obstet Gynecol. 2010;116(1): 35-42.

  12. 12.- Fisch JM, English D, Pedaline S, Brooks K, Simhan HN. Labor Induction Process Improvement. Obstet Gynecol. 2009;113(4): 797-803.

  13. 13.- Sociedad Española de Ginecología y Obstetricia. Embarazo cronológicamente prolongado. 2010.

  14. 14.- Fyfe EM, Anderson NH, North RA, Chan EH, Taylor RS, Dekker GA, et al. Risk of First-Stage and Second-Stage Cesarean Delivery by Maternal Body Mass Index Among Nulliparous Women in Labor at Term. Obstet Gynecol. 2011;117(6):1315-22.

  15. 15.- Tebeu PM, Mboudou E. Halle G, Kongnyuy E, Nkawbong E, Fomolu JN. Risk Factor of Delivery by Cesaraen Section in Cameroon (2003-2004): A regional Hospital Report. ISRN ObstetGynecol. 2011; 1-5.

  16. 16.- SchullerWA, Benítez G, Andrade L, Soto O, SchullerAM. Estudio de las gestantes de edad avanzada en el Hospital Universitario de Caracas. RFM [revista en la Internet]. 2007[01/07/14]; 30(1): 24-37. Disponible en: http://www.scielo.org.ve/ scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0798-04692007000100005&lng=es.

  17. 17.- Cleary J, Malone FD, Vidaver J, Ball RH, Nyberg DA, Comstock CH, et al. Impact of maternal age on obstetric outcome.Obstet Gynecol. 2005;105(5): 983-90.

  18. 18.- Estrada CG, Hernández R, Gómez C, Negrete ML. Incidencia de cesáreas en un hospital general de zona. RevMedInstMex Seguro Soc. 2012;50(5): 517-22.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com