medigraphic.com
SPANISH

Revista Cubana de Medicina

ISSN 1561-302X (Print)
  • Contents
  • View Archive
  • Information
    • General Information        
    • Directory
  • Publish
    • Instructions for authors        
  • medigraphic.com
    • Home
    • Journals index            
    • Register / Login
  • Mi perfil

2014, Number 2

<< Back Next >>

Rev cubana med 2014; 53 (2)

Comparison of results between retransplantation and primary kidney transplantation on 'Hermanos Ameijeiras' Hospital from 1984 to 2012

Borroto DG
Full text How to cite this article

Language: Spanish
References: 25
Page: 165-177
PDF size: 234.08 Kb.


Key words:

retransplantation, primary renal transplant, induction immunosuppression, graft and patient survival, complications.

ABSTRACT

Introduction: retransplant constitutes the best therapeutic choice for patients who lose a first renal transplant and return to dialysis, existing dissimilar criteria as to its results when ranking them with renal primary transplant.
Objective: to analyze the percentage of retransplantation, to revise graft and patient survival, to review the behavior of variables that can affect the results and to compare them with patients receiving a first renal transplant.
Methods: an analytic, descriptive, retrospective study was accomplished, including all renal transplant performed at the Hermanos Ameijeiras Hospital from 1984 to December of 2012. Third transplants, double transplants (two kidneys to the same receptor), combined transplants (pancreas-kidney and liver-kidney) and those where it was not possible to obtain the information required for this research were excluded. Variables of general nature were compared between retransplantation groups and first transplants, such as: age of recipient and donor, sex of the recipient, a disease that caused kidney failure, percentage of reactivity to a lymphocyte panel (PRA), HLA compatibility, donor type (living or dead), ischemia time, presence and duration of acute tubular necrosis (dead donor), rejection and graft and patient survival.
Results: Retransplant constituted only 5.4 % of the sample (34 patients). There were no differences in age, sex, PRA, donor type or compatibilities between the second and first grafts. Patients who reached the renal failure due to polycystic kidneys have never had a second transplant in our institution. The use of sequential quadruple therapy as induction immunosuppression, retransplantation (55.9 % vs. 9.7 % of primary) was statistically significant. The rejection rate was slightly lower in those receiving a second graft, but it was different for ischemic times, the presence and duration of NTA and graft survival which were very similar in both groups.
Conclusiones: retransplant constitutes the best therapeutic choice for patients who lose a first renal transplant and return to dialysis methods.


REFERENCES

  1. Wolfe RA, Ashby VB, Milford EL. Comparison of mortality in all patients on dialysis, patients on dialysis awaiting transplantation, and recipients of a first cadaveric transplant. N Engl J Med. 2007;341:1725-30.

  2. Berthoux F, Jones E, Gellert R, Mendel S, Saker L, Briggs D. Epidemiological data of treated end-stage renal failure in the European Union (EU) during the year 1995: report of the European Renal Association Registry and the National Registries. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 1999;14:2332-42.

  3. Denny RR, Sumrani N, Miles AMV. Survival on hemodialysis versus renal transplantation following primary renal allograft failure. Transplant Proc. 1997;29:3602-4.

  4. Gallichio MH, Hudson S, Young CJ, Diethelm AG, Deierhoi MH. Renal retransplantation at the University of Alabama at Birmingham: incidence and outcome. En: Cecka JM, Terasaki PI, eds. Clinical transplants. Cap. 14. Los Ángeles, CA: UCLA Tissue typing laboratory; 1998. p. 169-75.

  5. Rigden S, Mehls O, Gellert R. on behalf of the scientific advisory board of the ERA-EDTA registry. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 1999;14:566-9.

  6. Magee JC, Barr ML, Basadona GP. Repeat organ transplantation in the United States, 1996-2005. Am J Transplant. 2007;7:1424-33.

  7. Coupel S, Giral-Clase M, Karam G. Ten-years survival of second kidney transplants: impact of immunologic factors and renal function at 12 months. Kidney Intern. 2003;64:674-80.

  8. Marcen R, Fernández A, Fernández M, Terruel JL, Pérez-Flores I, Sánchez FA. El retrasplante. Cap.10. En: Guías SEN. Recomendaciones sobre la vuelta a diálisis del paciente trasplantado. Nefrología 2012 [citado 15 Nov. 2013]. Disponible en: http://www.senefro.org/modules/webstructure/files/cap_10_guias_dialisis_retx.pdf ?check_idfile=3653

  9. Howard RJ, Reed AI, van der Werf WJ, Hemming AW, Patton PR, Scornik JC. What happens to renal transplant recipients who lose their graft? Am J Kidney Dis. 2001;38:31-5.

  10. Marcén R, Pascual J, Tato AM. Renal transplant recipients outcome after losing the first graft. Transplant Proc. 2003;35(5):1679-81.

  11. Rao PS, Schaubel DE, Wei G, Fenton SSA. Evaluating the survival benefit of kidney retransplantation. Transplantation. 2006;82:669-74.

  12. Ojo AO, Wolfe RA, Agodoa LY. Prognosis alter primary renal transplant failure and the beneficial effect of repeat transplantation. Transplantation. 1998;66:1651- 9.

  13. Sellers MT, Velidedeoglu E, Bloom ED. Expanded -criteria donor kidneys: a single-center clinical and short-term financial analysis-cause for concern in retransplantation. Transplantation. 2004;78:1670-5.

  14. Jordan SC, Pescovitz MD. Presensitization: the problem and its management. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2006;1:421-32.

  15. Hirata M, Terasaki PI. Renal retransplantation. In: Cecka JM, Terasaki PI, eds. Clinical transplants. Cap. 34. Los Ángeles, CA: UCLA Tissue Typing Laboratory; 1994. p. 419-33.

  16. Gjertson DW. A multi-factor analysis of kidney regraft outcomes. ClinTranspl. 2002;3:335-49.

  17. Salvadori M, Bertoni E. Renal transplant allocation criteria, desensitization strategies and immunosuppressive therapy in retransplant renal patients. J Nephrol. 2012;25(6):890-9.

  18. Borroto DG. Individualización de la inmunosupresión de inducción en el trasplante renal, editorial. Rev Cubana Med 2013 [citado 15 Nov. 2013];52(1):1-3. Disponible en: http://scielo.sld.cu/pdf/med/v52n1/med01113.pdf

  19. Borroto DG, Guerrero DC. Inmunosupresión de inducción en el trasplante renal en el hospital Hermanos Ameijeiras de 1984-2012. Rev Cubana Med 2013 [citado 12 Nov. 2013];52(2):88-98. Disponible en: http://scielo.sld.cu/pdf/med/v52n2/med02213.pdf

  20. Arnol M, Prather JC, Mittalhenkle A, Barry JM, Norman DJ. Long-term kidney regraft survival from deceased donors: risk factors and outcomes in a single center. Transplantation. 2008;86(8):1084-9.

  21. Gruber SA, Brown KL, El-Amm JM, Singh A, Mehta K, Morawski K, et al. Equivalent outcomes with primary and retransplantation in African-American deceased-donor renal allograft recipients. Surgery. 2009;146(4):646-52.

  22. Humar A, Key N, Ramcharan T, Payne WD, Sutherland DE, Matas AJ. Kidney retransplants after initial graft loss to vascular thrombosis. Clin Transplant. 2001;15(1):6-10.

  23. Cho YW, Cecka JM. Cadaver-donor renal retransplants. ClinTranspl. 1993;32:469-84.

  24. Nankivell BJ, Alexander SI. Rejection of the kidney allograft. New Engl J Med. 2010;363:1451-62.

  25. Kasike BL, Israni AK, Syder JJ, Skeans MA. Relationship between kidney function and long term graft survival after kidney transplant. Am J Kidney Dis. 2011;57(3):466-75.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com

Mi perfil

C?MO CITAR (Vancouver)

Rev cubana med. 2014;53