medigraphic.com
ISSN 0001-0944 (Print)
Órgano Oficial de la Asociación Dental Mexicana

2014, Number 5

<< Back Next >>

Rev ADM 2014; 71 (5)

Oral lesions associated with prosthesis use in patients in the community of Kantunil, Yucatán

Rodríguez FMSC, Portillo RA, Lama GEM, Hernández SSE

Language: Spanish
References: 31
Page: 221-225
PDF size: 179.25 Kb.


ABSTRACT

Background: Removable dental prostheses are an alternative option in the treatment of missing teeth. However, these can cause damage to the supporting tissues. Factors such as reduced salivary flow, roughness, micropores on the surface of the acrylic used in the prosthesis, trauma, changes in pH or immunological deterioration, and poor fit and lack of stability are considered contributing factors in the development of lesions in the oral mucosa. Objective: To determine the prevalence of oral lesions associated with the use of removable acrylic dentures in patients at a health center in the community of Kantunil, Yucatán. Material and methods: An observational, descriptive, cross-sectional prospective study was carried out at the Rural Health Center in the community of Kantunil, Yucatán, involving 62 patients with acrylic dentures, who were examined over the period from February 2011 to January 2012. The data collected were processed using SPSS Version 15 for the descriptive statistics, differential, and χ2. Results: The most common oral lesion was denture stomatitis (32.3%). The prevalence of fibrous hyperplasia was 14.5%, angular cheilitis 12.9%, erythroplasia 9.7%, and leukoplakia 4.8%. Lesions in the oral mucosa were present in 25.8% of the population. A statistically significant correlation between the presence of oral lesions and prosthetic hygiene (p ‹ 0.05) was found. 45.16% of patients do not clean their dentures (33-38). A correlation was also found between the presence of the prosthesis and the occurrence of oral lesions. Conclusions: 75.8% of the population studied had oral lesions caused by their prosthesis. Dentists should inform their patients regarding the use and proper handling of their dentures, and perform regular checkups.


REFERENCES

  1. Bermejo A. Medicina Bucal Vol. 1: Enfermedades mucocutáneas y de las glándulas salivales. 3a ed. Madrid: Síntesis; 1998.

  2. McGivney G, Castleberry D, McCracken. Prótesis parcial removible. 11a ed. Barcelona: Elsevier; 2006.

  3. Philip J, Eversole L, Wyssocki G. Patología oral y maxilofacial contemporánea. Lesiones físicas y químicas. 2a ed. Barcelona: Elsevier; 2005.

  4. Carnevale S, Bassan N, Solano O. Detección de lesiones bucales en una población geriátrica. Buenos Aires: Dador; 2009.

  5. Castellanos J, Díaz L. Lesions of the oral mucosa: an epidemiological study of Mexican patients. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Endod. 2008; 105 (1): 79-85.

  6. Sánchez R. Causas que afectan el uso adecuado de la prótesis acrílica [tesis de especialidad]. Holguín: Clínica Estomatológica “Manuel Angulo Farrán”; 1982.

  7. Menaka A, Bellur S, Duong N, Billy B, Lu P, Palfreyman N et al. Evaluating surface roughness of a polyamide denture base material in comparison with poly (methylmetahacrylae). J Oral Science. 2010; 52 (54): 577-581.

  8. Effiom O, Adeymo W, Soyele O. Focal reactive lesions of the gingiva: an analysis of 314 cases at a tertiary Health Institution in Nigeria. Nigerian Med J. 2011; 52 (1): 35-40.

  9. Plana R, Perurena M. Tratamiento de la estomatitis subprotésica en atletas y exatletas con propomiel y nistatina. Rev Cub Med Dep & Cul Fis [Revista on-line]. 2011; 6 (3).

  10. Matos G, Andrade P, Rode A, Araújo C, Almeida V. Prevalencia de lesiones bucales asociadas con el uso de prótesis dentarias removibles en un servicio de estomatología. Rev Cub de Estomatol. 2011; 48 (3): 268-276.

  11. Kivovics P, Jáhn M, Borbély J, Márton K. Frequency and location of traumatic ulcerations following placement of complete dentures. Int J Prosthodont. 2007; 20: 397-401.

  12. Siegel M, Kahn M, Palazzolo M. Oral cancer: a prosthodontic diagnosis. J Prosthodont. 2009; 18 (1): 3-10.

  13. Sharon V, Fazel N. Oral candidiasis and angular cheilitis. Dermat Thera. 2010; 23 (3): 230-242.

  14. Porra I, Castro J. Hiperplasia fibrosa en paladar. Reporte de caso. Rev Cient Odontol. 2010; 6 (1): 28-30.

  15. Muñante J, Jaimes M, Olate S, Albergaria R. Consideraciones actuales en hiperplasia fibrosa inflamatoria. Acta Odontol Venez. 2009; 47 (2): 19-27.

  16. Lemus CLM, Triana K, del Valle SO, Fuertes RL, Sáez CR. Rehabilitaciones protésicas y su calidad como factor de riesgo en la aparición de lesiones en la mucosa bucal. Rev Cubana Estomatol [Revista on-line]. 2009; 46 (1).

  17. Gazparoto G, Almeida N, Carvalho V, Campanelli A, Soares V. Ageing exacerbates damage of systemic and salivary neutrophils from patients presenting Candida-related denture stomatitis. Inmun Ageing. 2009; 28 (6): 3.

  18. Bilhan H, Sulun T, Erkose K, Tayfun B. The role of Candida albicans hyphae and Lactobacillus in denture-related stomatitis. Cin Oral Invest. 2009; 13: 363-368.

  19. Al-Dwairi Z. Prevalence and risk factors associated with denture-related stomatitis in healthy subjects attending a dental teaching hospital in North Jordan. J Am Dent Assoc. 2008; 54 (2): 80-83.

  20. Expósitos J, Olazabal M, Calabuch H. Factores de riesgo de la estomatitis subprotésica en los pacientes del municipio de Teguasco. Gaceta Med Spirit. 2010; 12 (2): 1-4.

  21. Dagistan S, Aktas AE, Caglayan F, Ayyildiz A, Bilge M. Differencial diagnosis of denture-induced estomatitis, Candida, and their variations in patients using complete denture: a clinical and mycological study. Epub. 2009; 52 (3): 266-271.

  22. Sadig W. The denture hygiene, denture stomatitis and role of dental hygienist. I J Dent Hygiene. 2010; 8 (3): 227-231.

  23. Rathee M, Hooda A, Ghalaut P. Denture hygiene in geriatric persons. Internet J Geriat & Geront. 2010; 6 (1): 1.

  24. Zlataric D, Celebic A. Factors related to patients general satisfaction with removable partial dentures: a stepwise multiple regression analysis. Int J Prosthodont. 2008; 21 (2): 86-88.

  25. Helfer M, Louis P, Vermande G. Gestion des rapports intermaxillaires en prothese amovible complete. Stratégie Prothétique. 2010; 1 (2): 33-41.

  26. Rodríguez V, Arellano A, Zambrano VE, Roldán M. Lesiones de los tejidos blandos de soporte de pacientes portadores de prótesis totales. Los Nevados, estado Mérida. Rev Odon Andes. 2007; 2 (1): 31-36.

  27. Instituto Nacional de Estadística, Geografía e Informática [en línea]. 2011 [consultado 27 de septiembre de 2011]. Disponible en: http://www.inegi.org.mx/sistemas/mexicocifras/datos-geograficos/31/31042.pdf

  28. Diagnóstico Municipal de Desarrollo Rural Sustentable del Municipio de Kantunil [en línea]. 2011 [consultado 27 de septiembre de 2011]. Disponible en: http://www.campoyucatan.gob.mx/OEIDRUS/Municipalizacion/178_Merida/Kantunil/Dia gnostico_Kantunil.pdf

  29. Programa de Salud Bucal. Encuesta Nacional de Caries Dental 2010. 3a ed. México: Secretaría de Salud, Centro Nacional de Vigilancia Epidemiológica y Control de Enfermedades CENAVECE; 2010.

  30. Fontes H, Saquete P, Rabello M. Denture-related oral mucosal lesions among farmers in a semi-arid Northeastern Region of Brazil. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2011; 16 (6): 740-744.

  31. Bernal C. Estado de conservación de la prótesis y presencia de lesiones en mucosas de pacientes portadores de prótesis parcial removible. Kiru. 2010; 7 (1): 9-12.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com