medigraphic.com
SPANISH

Dermatología Cosmética, Médica y Quirúrgica

Órgano oficial de la Sociedad Mexicana de Cirugía Dermatológica y Oncológica, AC
  • Contents
  • View Archive
  • Information
    • General Information        
    • Directory
  • Publish
    • Instructions for authors        
  • medigraphic.com
    • Home
    • Journals index            
    • Register / Login
  • Mi perfil

2013, Number 2

<< Back Next >>

Dermatología Cosmética, Médica y Quirúrgica 2013; 11 (2)

Skin protection in high school students. Evaluation of general knowledge, habits, and practices

Vera IDS, González SPC, Domínguez CJ
Full text How to cite this article

Language: Spanish
References: 16
Page: 94-103
PDF size: 443.37 Kb.


Key words:

Educational intervention, knowledge, attitudes, practices, sun exposure, skin cancer, sunscreens.

ABSTRACT

Background: Perception that a beautiful tan is healthy and attractive, to educate adolescents about sun protection is quite difficult. Research on skin cancer prevention has increased in recent years, also better advances in technological methods are used to estimate UV exposure and UV damage. Our goal was to determine the educational impact and knowledge, attitudes and practices concerning sun protection among the children of secondary schools and colleges.
Materials and methods: A cohort, prospective and intervention study was conducted, at three secondary schools in Mexico City. The 446 students were evaluated by a self- administered and structured test, with questions on knowledge, attitudes and practices about sun protection before, and 3 months after an educational project comparing performance pretest and posttest.
Results: Four hundred and forty six students were included in this study; 54% female and 46% males. 892 questionnaires were analyzed. Exposure time was 20.2 hours per week. Among the 446 students who participated in the study, 47.8 % had olive skin (light-brown). Some students, improved significantly from their pretest to posttest scores (p‹ 0.05) in the schools (S) 1, 2 and 3. Students who had knowledge about sun exposure (75.6%-84.9%; p=.000) S1; (75%-98.4%; p=.001) S3 and were aware that sun exposure has been associated with adverse health consequences including: that sun exposure caused skin cancer (91.4%-94.3%; p=.011) S2; that mortality is increased (86.2%-87.2%; p=.002) S1; but it is curable (41.0%-45.5%; p=.039) S1; than excessive sun exposure is related to aging of the skin (40.1%-60.6%; p=.001) S1; that immune response is altered (57.7%-74%; p=.007) S1. Besides a great majority of the students recognized that sun exposure produces adverse health consequences, some students believed tanning is unhealthy (61.2% S1; 68.6% S2; 60.9% S3). Limitations: This study only used one health educator and was restricted to only three private and public schools in Mexico City.
Conclusions: Dermatologist can provide leadership in designing, implementing, and evaluating promising strategies to increase skin cancer prevention. This study demonstrates that modest education among students of different grades, sexes and ages can increase knowledge of skin care, including knowledge and practices of sun protection, and diminishing skin cancer.


REFERENCES

  1. Castanedo-Cazares JP, Torres-Alvarez B, Medellin-Pérez ME, et al. “Conocimientos y actitudes de la población mexicana con respecto a la radiación solar”. Gaceta Médica de México 2006; 142 (6):451-455.

  2. Castanedo-Cazares JP, Lepe V, Gordillo-Moscoso A, Moncada B. “Dosis de radiación ultravioleta en escolares mexicanos”. Salud Pública Mex 2003; 45: 439-444.

  3. Kullavanijaya P, Lim HW. “Photoprotection”. JAAD 2005; 52: 937-958.

  4. Bolognia JL, Jorizzo JL, Rapini RP, et al. Dermatology, vol II, Mosby, 2003, oo. 2373-2378.

  5. Romaní F, Ramos C, Posso M, Rúa O, Rojas J, Siccha M, et al. “Conocimientos, actitudes y prácticas sobre protección solar en Internos de Medicina de cinco hospitales generales de Lima y Callao”. Folia dermatol. Peru 2005; 16(2): 61-66.

  6. Johnson KR, Heilig LF, Hester EJ, Francis SO, Deakyne SJ, Dellavalle RP. “Attitudes and Practices of US Dermatologist Compared with Other Medical Specialist”. Arch Dermatol 2006; 142: 465-470.

  7. Glanz K, Halpern AC, Saraiya M. “Behavioral and Community Interventions to Prevent Skin Cancer”. Arch Dermatol 2006; 142: 356-360.

  8. Emmons KM, Colditz GA. “Preventing excess sun exposure: it is time for a national policy”. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1999; 91: 1269-1270.

  9. Hymowitz MB, Hayes BB, Maury JJ, Geller AC. “Evaluation of Medical Students’ Knowledge, Attitudes, and Personal Practices of Sun Protection and Skin Self-examination”. Arch Dermatol 2006; 142: 523-525.

  10. Berwick M, Begg CB, Fine JA, Roush GC, Barnhill RL. “Screening for cutaneous melanoma by skin self-examination”. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1996; 88: 17-23.

  11. Irwin B, Mauriello D, Hemminger L, Pappert A, Kimball AB. “Skin sun-acne tutorial evaluation among middle-and high-school students in central New Jersey”. JAAD 2007; 56 (3): 407-412.

  12. Turrisi R, Stapleton J, Mallett K, Hillhouse J. “Methods in Skin Cancer Prevention”. Arch Dermatol 2006; 142: 1348-1349.

  13. Buller MK, Goldberg G, Buller D. “Sun smart day: a pilot program for photoprotection education”. Pediatr Dermatol 1997; 14: 257-263.

  14. Brown S, Schonenly L. “Test of an educational intervention for osteoporosis prevention with US adolescents”. Orthop Nurs 2004; 23: 245-251.

  15. O’Riordan DL, Lunde KB, Steffen AD, Maddock JE, “Validity of Beachgoers’ Self-report of their sun habits”. Arch Dermatol. 2006 ; 142: 1304 -1311.

  16. Centers of Disease control and Prevention. “Guidelines for school programs to prevent skin cancer”. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2002; 51 (No. RR-4).




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com

Mi perfil

C?MO CITAR (Vancouver)

Dermatología Cosmética, Médica y Quirúrgica. 2013;11