medigraphic.com
SPANISH

Revista de Investigación Clínica

Instituto Nacional de Ciencias Médicas y Nutrición Salvador Zubirán
  • Contents
  • View Archive
  • Information
    • General Information        
    • Directory
  • Publish
    • Instructions for authors        
  • medigraphic.com
    • Home
    • Journals index            
    • Register / Login
  • Mi perfil

2014, Number S1

<< Back Next >>

Rev Invest Clin 2014; 66 (S1)

Comparative study of the volume difference vs. healthy limb, morphological and population description in transfemoral amputees

Mendoza-Cruz F, Rodríguez G, Galván-Duque C, Álvarez M
Full text How to cite this article

Language: Spanish
References: 22
Page: 85-93
PDF size: 295.82 Kb.


Key words:

Amputation, Transfemoral, Stump, Volume, Morphology.

ABSTRACT

Knowledge of the general characteristics and physical condition that keeps the transfemoral amputation stump to select and adapt appropriate type of prosthesis to restore a walking pattern amputee patient acceptable and useful design parameters set to propose new prosthetic systems. In this paper, the degree of difference between the volumes of the limb stump and healthy as well as morphological features occurred more frequently in the stumps of transfemoral amputees who were treated at the Laboratory of Orthotics and Prosthetics (LOP), Instituto Nacional de Rehabilitación (INR) in 2008. It captured all patients with unilateral transfemoral amputation left and right, over 18 years old, both sexes, use of hearing candidates were evaluated clinically and took three measurements of the circumferences at different wavelengths and the limb stump healthy, were calculated volumes of both sides using the mathematical model of the truncated cone and analyzed in three groups according to the level of amputation (proximal, middle and distal third). We obtained 49 patients, 39 men and 10 women, the difference stump volume compared to healthy limb volume per group were: 44.9% proximal third, middle third and distal 26.5%, 21.1%, the frequency of diagnostic data showed a stump right transfemoral amputees, due to metabolic, without use of prostheses, the most common morphological features indicate that the stump has a conical shape and size distal third, whose tissue is semi-flaccid consistency, the scar is not adhered to deep planes and shows a negative tinel, the mattress soft tissue is 2.15 ± 1.3 cm and physically presents a force level 4 in the clinical rating scale Daniels. The data are consistent with other studies comparing the percentage of the volume change with the percentages of reduced diameters transfemoral stump muscle, likewise agrees most amputees incidence of diabetes mellitus with other studies, cataloging it eat first cause amputation. The general description developed transfemoral stump-served in the INR will help in the process of manufacture of prostheses and prosthetic design new systems that you attend these needs.


REFERENCES

  1. Mier N, Ory M, Zhan D, Villarreal E, Alen M, Bolin J. Ethnic and health correlates of diabetes-related amputations at the Texas- Mexico border. Rev Panam Salud Pública 2010; 28(3): 214-20.

  2. Gutiérrez JP, Rivera-Dommarco J, Shamah-Levy T, Villalpando- Hernández S, Franco A, Cuevas-Nasu L, et al. Encuesta Nacional de Salud y Nutrición 2012. Resultados Nacionales. Instituto Nacional de Salud Pública, 2012. Disponible en: http:// ensanut insp.mx/informes/ENSANUT2012ResultadosNacionales. pdf [Acceso: febrero 2013].

  3. Quiñones I, Péres I, Alessi A, Rodriguez G, Nuñez L, Pacheco M. Análisis de las presiones ejercidas dentro del socket durante el ciclo de la marcha en pacientes con amputación transfemorales. IV Latin American Congress on Biomedical Engineering 2007, Bioengineering Solutions for Latin America Health IFMBE Proceedings 2008; 18: 774-8.

  4. Viladot R, Cohí O, Clavell S. Ortesis y Prótesis del Aparato Locomotor, Volumen 2.2 Extremidad Inferior, Parálisis Fracturas Lesiones Ligamentosas de Rodilla y Tobillo Amputaciones y Protetización. Madrid: Ed. Masson; 2002, p. 251-9.

  5. Zachariah SC, Saxena R, Fergason JR, Sanders JE. Shape and volume change in the transtibial residuum over the short term: Preliminary investigation of six subjects. J Rehabil Res Dev 2004; 41(5): 683-94.

  6. Pacheco M, Flores O, Guadarrama J, Chávez D, Diez G. Fortalecimiento muscular con ejercicios isocinéticos en pacientes amputados por arriba de rodilla en periodo preprotésico. Estudio de 10 casos. Rev Mex Med Fis Rehab 2004; 16: 104-9.

  7. Sanders JE, Lee GS. A means to accommodate residual limb movement during optical scanning: A technical note. IEEE Trans Neural Sys Rehabil Eng 2008; 16(5): 505-9.

  8. González M, Condón M. Causas y consecuencias de la atrofia muscular y desmineralización en los amputados de la extremidad inferior. Rehabilitación (Madr) 2000; 34(4): 285-93. Mendoza-Cruz F, et al. Amputación transfemoral: volumen del muñón vs. el miembro sano. Rev Invest Clin 2014; 66 (Supl. 1): s85-s93 s93

  9. González M, Cohí O, Salinas F. Amputación de extremidad inferior y discapacidad. Prótesis y rehabilitación. Madrid: Masson; 2005, p. 3, 143-4.

  10. Sanders JE, Jacobsen AK, Fergason JR. Effects of fluid insert volume changes on socket pressures and shear stresses: Case studies from two trans-tibial amputee subjects. Prosthet Orthot Int 2006; 30(3): 257-69.

  11. Seymour R. Prosthetics and orthotics: Lower limb and spinal. Riverwoods: Ed. Lippincott Willians & Wilkins; 2002, p. 10-3.

  12. Ocampo M, Henao L, Vásquez L. Amputación de miembro inferior: cambios funcionales inmovilización y actividad física. Facultad de Rehabilitación y Desarrollo Humano. Bogotá: Universidad del Rosario; 2010, p. 26.

  13. Umberto C, Massimiliano B. Biomechanics of sprinting amputees athletes. J Biomech 2006; 39(1): S548-S549.

  14. Boonhong J. Validity and reliability of girth measurement (circumference measurement) for calculating residual limb volume in below-knee amputees. Chula Med J 2007; 51: 77-88.

  15. Huang M, Levy C, Webter J. Acquired limb deficiencies. Prosthetics components, prescriptions and indications. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2001; 82: S17-S24.

  16. Sanders JE, Rogers EL, Abrahamson DC. Assessment of residual- limb volume change using bioimpedence. J Rehabil Res Dev 2007; 44(4): 525-36.

  17. Buis A, Condon B, Brennan D, McHugh B, Hadley D. Magnetic resonance imaging technology in transtibial socket research: A pilot study. J Rehabil Res Dev 2006; 43(7): 883-90.

  18. Boonhong J. Correlation between volumes and circumferences of residual limb in below knee amputees. J Med Assoc Thai 2006; 89(Suppl. 3): S1-S4.

  19. Sanders J, Fatone S. Residual limb volume change: Systematic review of measurement and management. JRRD 2011; 48(8): 949-86.

  20. Hislop H, Montgomery J. Técnicas de balance muscular. Biomédica: Manual professional Daniel’s and Worthington’s Muscle Testing. Miamisburg: Elsevier Science Health Science Division, 2003: 2.

  21. Macías L. Determinación de las características demográficas, etiológicas, quirúrgicas, sensoriales y enfermedades concomitantes de 463 pacientes amputados transfemorales del Centro Nacional de Rehabilitación. México, D.F.: Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Facultad de Medicina. Tesis de Especialidad. 2005.

  22. Hagberg K, Brånemark R, Hägg O. Questionnaire for Persons with a Transfemoral Amputation (Q-TFA): Initial validity and reliability of a new outcome measure. JRRD 2004; 41(5): 695-706.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com

Mi perfil

C?MO CITAR (Vancouver)

Rev Invest Clin. 2014;66