Alva EC, Fuentes DMA, Garibay HT

Language: Spanish
References: 14
Page: 338-346
PDF size: 287.89 Kb.

ABSTRACT

Aim: To assess the user evaluation of the electronic health records system together with its training program and to investigate the relation between the number of training sessions and the corresponding evaluation scores given by the participants. Material and Methods: An anonymous survey was conducted between the medical, nursing and social worker personnel. The survey included seven multiple-choice questions with a numerical scale from 1 to 10 and an additional open question. Statistical analysis: IBM SPSS Statistics v18 software was used to perform ANOVA variance analysis. Results: In total, 340 workers participated in this study; 317 were included in the statistical analysis, out of which 76% had one or two training sessions, 13.9% received three or more sessions and 10% had no training. The mean global training evaluation by the participants was 5.9 ± 2.3, median 6.3, while the electronic records system evaluation was 5.2 ± 2.3, median 5.5. Conclusions: In relation to the training and electronic records system it was observed that higher evaluation scores were obtained with increasing number of training sessions (p ‹ 0.001). On the electronic records systems, personnel with no training evaluated the system with a mean score of 3.9 ± 2.7, while those who received three or more training sessions evaluated the system with a mean score of 6.1 ± 1.8 (p ‹ 0.001).

REFERENCES

1. US House of Representatives. Committees and Commerce, Ways and Means, and Science and Technology. Title: Health Information Technology for Economic and Clinical Health Act or HITECH. Act. January 19, 2009. [Internet] Disponible en: http://waysandmeans.house.gov/media/ pdf/110hit2.pdf.

2. US Department of Health, Human Services. HIT Policy Committee: Meaningful Use Work.group request for comments regarding Meaningful Use stage 2. [Internet] Disponible en: http//healthhit.hhs.gov/media/faca/ MU_RFC%20_2011-01-12_final.pdf.

3. American Medical Association. H.R.1, The American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009: explanation of health information technology (HIT) provisions. [Internet] Disponible en: http//www.ama-assn.org/ ama1/pub/upload/mm/399/arra-hit-provisions.pdf.

4. National Audit Office: The National Programme for IT in the NHS: Progress since 2006; 2008. [Internet] Disponible en: http:/www.nao.org.uk/ publications/0708/the_national_programme_for_it.aspx.

5. Monografía “Expediente Clínico Electrónico”. Ing. Nancy Gertrudis Salvador. CINVESTAV. Congreso Internacional de Tecnologías Informáticas para la Educación en Salud. Tuxtla Gutiérrez, Chis. México 2009. http:// www.congresosalud.unach.mx/recursos/Expediente_clinico_electronico_ 21.pdf

6. Robertson A, Cresswell K, Takian A, et al. Implementation and adoption of nationwide electronic health records in secondary care in England: qualitative analysis of interim results from prospective national evaluation. BMJ. 2010:341:c4564.

7. Ross J. Electronic medical records: the promises and challenges. J Perianesth Nurs. 2009;24(5):327-9.

8. Takian A, Sheikh A, Barber N. We are bitter, but we are better off: case study of the implementation of an electronic health record system into a mental health hospital in England. BMC Health Services Research. 2012;12:484.

9. De Veer AJE, Francke AL. Attitudes of nursering staff towards electronic patient records: a questionare survey. Int J Nurs Stud. 2010;47(7):846-54.

10. Norma Oficial Mexicana en materia de Sistemas de Expediente Clínico Electrónico. [Internet] Disponible en: http://www.dgis.salud.gob.mx/descargas/ pdf/NOM-024-SSA3-2010_SistemasECE.pdf.

11. Stevenson JE, Nilsson GC, Petersson GI, Johansson PE. Nureses´ experience using electronic patient records en everyday practice in acute/ inpatient Ward settings: a literatura review. Health Informatics. 2010; 16(1):63-72.

12. Spooner SA. Special requirements of electronic health records systems in pediatrics. Pediatrics. 2007;119(3):631-7.

13. Baillie L, Chadwick S, Mann R, Brooke-Read M. Students´ experiences of electronic health records in practice. Br J Nurs. 2012;21(21):1262-4.

14. Gracy D, Weisman J, Grant MA, Pruitt J, Brito A. Content Barriers to pediatric uptake of electronic health records. Adv Pediatr. 2012; 59(1):159-81.