medigraphic.com
SPANISH

Gaceta Médica de México

ISSN 0016-3813 (Print)
  • Contents
  • View Archive
  • Information
    • General Information        
    • Directory
  • Publish
    • Instructions for authors        
  • medigraphic.com
    • Home
    • Journals index            
    • Register / Login
  • Mi perfil

2014, Number s3

<< Back Next >>

Gac Med Mex 2014; 150 (s3)

The formative role of the laboratory in teaching the science of physiology

Guevara-Guzmán R, Urrutia AME
Full text How to cite this article

Language: Spanish
References: 13
Page: 365-368
PDF size: 223.74 Kb.


Key words:

Teaching, Physiology, Multidisciplinary laboratory.

ABSTRACT

Physiology teaching began with Claudius Galenus (c. 126-199 AD), known as Galen, who is considered the initiator of experimental physiology. This discipline was consolidated in the XIX century with the discoveries of Claude Bernard, which influenced the way of teaching this discipline in universities, independently from Anatomy. In Mexico, physiology teaching started in 1580. It was at the beginning of the XIX century when Valentín Gómez Farías created the professorship in Medical Sciences and Daniel Vergara Lope carried out its consolidation when he implemented a lab course. Doctor José Joaquín Izquierdo established that this subject ought to be taught by teachers with experience in research. Undoubtedly, formative physiology teaching carried out in labs must strengthen the application of method and scientific methodology in students. In this symposium, we put forward that the change in physiology teaching must promote multidisciplinary research in students, who will formulate a research question and develop an experimental model that will let them integrate their basic knowledge of physiology, pharmacology, biochemistry, and functional anatomy under the supervision of a research teacher.


REFERENCES

  1. Figueroa H. Historia de la fisiología en Guatemala. Guatemala: Centro Editorial Guatemala; 1958.

  2. Foster M. Lectures on the history of physiology during the sixteenth, seventeenth and eighteenth. EE.UU.: Cambridge University Press; 1901.

  3. Izquierdo JJ. Introducción al estudio de la medicina experimental. México: Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México; 1994.

  4. Izquierdo J. La fisiología en México. México: Casa Editorial Cultura; 1934.

  5. Rodríguez de Romo AC. Fisiología mexicana en el siglo XIX: la enseñanza. Asclepio. 2000;LII(1):217-23.

  6. Campbell EJ. Basic science, science, and medical education. Lancet. 1976;1(7951):134-6.

  7. Sweeney G. The state of play in 1999: closing remarks. Clin Invest Med. 2000;23:37-8.

  8. Díaz Barriga F. Cognición situada y estrategias para el aprendizaje significativo. Rev Elec de Inves Educ. 2003;5(2). [Internet] Disponible en: http://redie.ens.uabc.mx/vol5no2/contenido-arceo.html

  9. Joyce B, Weil M. Modelos de enseñanza. Madrid: Anaya/2;1985.

  10. Jiménez Alexandre MP. Diseño curricular: Indagación y razonamiento con el lenguaje de las ciencias. Enseñanza de las Ciencias. 1998;16(2):203-16.

  11. Puente Ferreras A. Cognición y Aprendizaje. Fundamentos Psicológicos. Madrid: Pirámide; 2003.

  12. Nieto Gil JM. Estrategias para mejorar la práctica docente. Madrid: CCS; 2004.

  13. Lujan HL, Di Carlo SE. Too much learning, not enough learning: what is the solution? Adv Physiol Educ. 2006;30(1):17-22.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com

Mi perfil

C?MO CITAR (Vancouver)

Gac Med Mex. 2014;150