medigraphic.com
SPANISH

Revista Mexicana de Cirugía Endoscópica

ISSN 1665-2576 (Print)
  • Contents
  • View Archive
  • Information
    • General Information        
    • Directory
  • Publish
    • Instructions for authors        
    • Send manuscript
  • medigraphic.com
    • Home
    • Journals index            
    • Register / Login
  • Mi perfil

2013, Number 4

<< Back Next >>

Rev Mex Cir Endoscop 2013; 14 (4)

Laparoscopic common bile duct exploration with intraoperative choledochoscopy for the management of choledocholithiasis: case report in the 2008-2013 Pemex HCSAE

Mata QCJ, Farell RJ, Luna MJ, Cuevas OVJ, Sosa LAJ
Full text How to cite this article

Language: Spanish
References: 15
Page: 186-191
PDF size: 238.72 Kb.


Key words:

Surgery, cholelithiasis, choledocholithiasis, ERCP.

ABSTRACT

ype: Case reports. Objective: Publish the experience of our center in the management of bile duct stones by laparoscopy as first-line treatment. Introduction: Laparoscopic bile duct exploration (LBDE) with choledochoscopy is as safe and efficient as endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) to achieve the management of choledocholithiasis, as long as there are resources available, surgeons and centers specializing in advanced laparoscopic surgery. ERCP remains today the method of choice for the management of choledocholithiasis, but there is enough information in the international literature that supports the laparoscopic exploration of biliary tract as a method as effective as ERCP. Material and methods: During the period of 5 years (2008-2013), in the Hospital Central Sur de Alta Especialidad PEMEX the author performed in 28 patients, laparoscopic cholecystectomy and bile duct exploration assisted with intraoperative choledochoscopy. Results: LBDE was performed in 28 patients, with a success rate of stone extraction of 87%, average hospital stay of 4.5 days, 140 minutes mean operative time, 17% morbidity, mortality 0%, average bleeding 80 mL, 3-4 laparoscopic ports, and 46% of the times the extraction was achieved via cystic duct and the rest via main bile duct. Discussion: Our results can be compared with those already reported in different internationally series of cases. Conclusions: In order to solve the gallbladder disease and choledocholithiasis in a single surgical procedure, in a safe, effective way, and potentially shorter hospital stay and costs, cholecystectomy with laparoscopic bile duct exploration with intraoperative choledochoscopy is emerging as an excellent treatment option.


REFERENCES

  1. Ingraham AM, Cohen ME, Ko CY et al. A current profile and assessment of North American cholecystectomy: results from the American college of surgeons national surgical quality improvement program. J Am Coll Surg. 2010; 211: 176.

  2. Verbesey JE, Birkett DH. Common bile duct exploration for choledocholithiasis. Surg Clin North Am. 2008; 88: 1315.

  3. Barkun AN, Barkun JS, Fried GM et al. Useful predictors of bile duct stones in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy. McGill Gallstone Treatment Group. Ann Surg. 1994; 220: 32.

  4. Saxon Connor NA. Meta-analysis of one- vs. two-stage laparoscopic/endoscopic management of common bile duct stones. HPB. 2012; 14 (4): 254-259.

  5. Maple JT, Ben-Menachem T et al. The role of endoscopy in the evaluation of suspected choledocolithiasis. Gastroinest Endosc. 2010; 71 (1): 1-9.

  6. Shojaiefard A, Esmaeilzadeh M, Ghafouri A et al. Various techniques for the surgical treatment of common bile duct stones: a meta-review. Gastroenterol Res Pract. 2009; 2009: 840208.

  7. Hanif F, Ahmed Z, Samie MA, Nassar AH. Laparoscopic transcystic bile duct exploration: the treatment of first choice for common bile duct stones. Surg Endosc. 2010; 24: 1552.

  8. Rojas-Ortega S, Arizpe-Bravo D, Marín López ER et al. Transcystic common bile duct exploration in the management of patients with choledocholithiasis. J Gastrointest Surg. 2003; 7: 492.

  9. Topal B, Aerts R, Penninckx F. Laparoscopic common bile duct stone clearance with flexible choledochoscopy. Surg Endosc. 2007; 21: 2317.

  10. Memon MA, Hassaballa H, Memon MI. Laparoscopic common bile duct exploration: the past, the present, and the future. Am J Surg. 2000; 179: 309.

  11. Gurusamy KS, Samraj K. Primary closure versus T-tube drainage after laparoscopic common bile duct stone exploration. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 20071.

  12. Jameel M, Darmas B, Baker AL. Trend towards primary closure following laparoscopic exploration of the common bile duct. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2008; 90: 29.

  13. Zhu QD, Tao CL, Zhou MT et al. Primary closure versus T-tube drainage after common bile duct exploration for choledocholithiasis. Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2011; 396: 53.

  14. Barkun AN, Barkun JS, Fried GM et al. Useful predictors of bile duct stones in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy. McGill Gallstone Treatment Group. Ann Surg. 1994; 220: 32.

  15. Bansal VK, Misra MC, Rajan K et al. Single-stage laparoscopic common bile duct exploration and cholecystectomy versus two-stage endoscopic stone extraction followed by laparoscopic cholecystectomy for patients with concomitant gallbladder stones and common bile duct stones: a randomized controlled trial. Surg Endosc. 2013.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com

Mi perfil

C?MO CITAR (Vancouver)

Rev Mex Cir Endoscop. 2013;14