medigraphic.com
SPANISH

Revista Cubana de Higiene y Epidemiología

ISSN 1561-3003 (Electronic)
  • Contents
  • View Archive
  • Information
    • General Information        
    • Directory
  • Publish
    • Instructions for authors        
  • medigraphic.com
    • Home
    • Journals index            
    • Register / Login
  • Mi perfil

2014, Number 1

<< Back Next >>

Rev Cubana Hig Epidemiol 2014; 52 (1)

Context, perception of the economic situation and blood pressure figures

Díaz-Perera FG, Bacallao GJ, Alemañy PE
Full text How to cite this article

Language: Spanish
References: 20
Page: 15-28
PDF size: 308.59 Kb.


Key words:

context, perception of the economic situation, blood pressure, arterial hypertension.

ABSTRACT

Introduction: all human activities occur in a context. Attributes, characteristics and indicators are conditioned by their context. Perception of the economic situation is one of the social epidemiology variables used in research about the selfefficacy and expectations of health outcomes. Hypertension is a risk factor for heart disease.
Objectives: estimate the influence of perception of the economic situation by polyclinics upon blood pressure figures.
Methods: a descriptive study was conducted based on probabilistic sampling of the families in 12 family doctor's and nurse's consultation offices from seven polyclinics in Havana. The variables analyzed were age and individual assessment of the perception of the economic situation. The following assessment scale was used: 1. Excellent, 2. Good, 3. Fair, 4. Bad and 5. Very Bad. During the physical and anthropometric examination of the adults surveyed, the following measurements were taken: weight, height, body mass index, waist circumference and blood pressure.
Results: a higher number of hypertensives was found in families that perceive their economic situation as bad or very bad. There is a clear relationship between perception of the economic situation and systolic and diastolic blood pressure. Standardized blood pressure values rise as perception of the economic situation worsens. However, as viewed by polyclinics, systolic and diastolic blood pressure trajectories are not parallel.
Conclusions: the pattern of association between certain individual factors and blood pressure figures varies between polyclinics. A modulation effect is exerted by the context upon the impact of individual factors. Perception of the economic situation should be included as a correlate of health conditions in future epidemiological studies.


REFERENCES

  1. Iñiguez Rojas L. Territorio y contextos en la salud de la población. Rev Cubana Salud Pública [Internet]. 2008 Mar [citado 27 marzo 2012];34(1). Disponible en: http://scielo.sld.cu/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0864- 34662008000100006&lng=es

  2. Acosta Sariego JR. Comentarios al artículo: Territorio y contextos en la salud de la población. Rev Cubana Salud Pública [Internet]. 2008 Mar [citado 27 marzo 2012];34(1). Disponible en: http://scielo.sld.cu/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0864- 34662008000100007&lng=es

  3. Cabieses B, Zitko P, Pinedo R, Espinoza M, Albor C. ¿Cómo se ha medido la posición social en investigación en salud? Una revisión de la literatura internacional. Rev Panam Salud Pública [Internet]. 2011 Junio [citado 27 abril 2012];29(6):457- 468. Disponible en: http://www.scielosp.org/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1020- 49892011000600012&lng=en; http://www.dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1020- 49892011000600012

  4. Gutiérrez T, Escursell RM, Sánchez D, Deus J. Instrumentos de evaluación en Psicología de la Salud. Madrid: Alianza Editorial, S.A.; 2003.

  5. Borrell C, Pasarín MI. Editorial Desigualdad en salud y territorio urbano. Gac Sanit [Internet]. 2004 feb [citado 27 marzo 2012];18(1):01-04. Disponible en: http://scielo.isciii.es/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0213- 91112004000100001&lng=es

  6. McDowell I. Thesis From risk factors to explanation in public health. Journal of Public Health. 2008;30(3):219–23.

  7. Seeman T, Epel E, Gruenewald T, Karlamangla A, McEwen BS. Socio-economic differentials in peripheral biology: Cumulative allostatic load. Ann NY Acad Sci. 2010;1186:223–39.

  8. Dow WH, Schoeni RF, Adler NE, Stewart J. Evaluating the evidence base: Policies and interventions to address socioeconomic status gradients in health [Internet]. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2010 [cited 2012 march 27];1186:240–251. Available from: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1749-6632.2009.05386.x/full

  9. Iñiguez L. La diferenciación territorial de la salud en la recuperación de los contextos. En: Barcellos C. A Geografia e o contexto dos problemas de saúde. Rio de Janeiro: ABRASCO; 2008. p. 87–106.

  10. Barcellos C, Buzai GD. La dimensión espacial de las desigualdades sociales en salud: aspectos de su evolución conceptual y metodológica. En: Anuario de la División Geografía 2005-2006 [Internet]. Luján, Argentina: Departamento de Ciencias Sociales. Universidad Nacional de Luján; 2006. p. 275-292 [citado 27 marzo 2012]. Disponible en: http://www.gesigproeg. com.ar/documentos/articulos/2007-Barcellos-Buzai-Anuario.pdf

  11. Simone MS, Chor D, Werneck LG. Demarcation of local neighborhoods to study relations between contextual factors and health. International Journal of Health Geographics [Internet]. 2010 [cited 2012 march 10];9:34. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2915962/

  12. López-Jaramillo P, Pradilla LP, Castillo VR, Lahera V. Patologías socioeconómica como causa de las diferencias regionales en las prevalencias de síndrome metabólico e hipertensión inducida por el embarazo. Rev Esp Cardiol. 2007;60(2):168-78.

  13. Loucks EB, Abrahamowicz M, Xiao Y, Lynch JW. Associations of education with 30 year life course blood pressure trajectories: Framingham Offspring Study. BMC Public Health. 2011;11:139.

  14. Kawachi I, Adler NE, Dow WH. Money, schooling, and health: Mechanisms and causal evidence. Ann NY Acad Sci. 2010;1186:56–68.

  15. Winkleby M, Cubbin C, Ahn D. Low Individual Socioeconomic Status, Neighborhood Socioeconomic Status, and Adult Mortality. American Journal of Public Health. 2006;96(12):2145-53.

  16. Galobardes B, Morabia A. Measuring the habitat as an indicator of socioeconomic position: methodology and its association with hypertension. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2003;57:248–253.

  17. Morenoff JD, House JS, Hansen Ben B, Williams DR, Kaplan GA, Hunte Haslyn E. Understanding social disparities in hypertension prevalence, awareness, treatment, and control: The role of neighborhood context. Social Science & Medicine. 2007;65:1853–1866.

  18. Lynch J, Davey SG, Harper S, Bainbridge K. Explaining the social gradient in coronary heart disease: comparing relative and absolute risk approaches. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2006;60:436–441.

  19. Benach J, Muntaner C. Aprender a mirar la salud. ¿Cómo la desigualdad social daña nuestra salud? Barcelona: Editorial El Viejo Topo; 2005.

  20. Armas Rojas NB, Dueñas Herrera A, Noval García R, Castillo Guzmán A, Suárez Medina R, Varona Pérez P, et. al. Enfermedades del corazón y sus características epidemiológicas en la población cubana de 15 años y más. Rev Cubana Invest Bioméd [Internet]. 2009 Dic [citado 27 marzo 2012];28(4). Disponible en: http://scielo.sld.cu/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0864- 03002009000400004&lng=es




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com

Mi perfil

C?MO CITAR (Vancouver)

Rev Cubana Hig Epidemiol. 2014;52