medigraphic.com
SPANISH

Revista ADM Órgano Oficial de la Asociación Dental Mexicana

ISSN 0001-0944 (Print)
Órgano Oficial de la Asociación Dental Mexicana
  • Contents
  • View Archive
  • Information
    • General Information        
    • Directory
  • Publish
    • Instructions for authors        
    • Send manuscript
  • medigraphic.com
    • Home
    • Journals index            
    • Register / Login
  • Mi perfil

2015, Number 1

<< Back Next >>

Rev ADM 2015; 72 (1)

Stimulated saliva flow rate analysis and its relation to dental decay. A six years follow-up.

Sánchez-Pérez L, Sáenz-Martínez L, Luengas-Aguirre I, Irigoyen CE, Álvarez CÁR, Acosta-Gio E
Full text How to cite this article

Language: Spanish
References: 14
Page: 33-37
PDF size: 188.70 Kb.


Key words:

Stimulated saliva flow, caries, dmfs, DMFS.

ABSTRACT

Objective: To establish whether the annual fluctuations in stimulated salivary flow rate (SFR) (over a period of six years) are associated with the prevalence of dental caries in primary and permanent teeth. Method: 110 public school children were studied, 48% boys (n = 53) and 52% girls (n = 57). The dropout rate within the sample was 18% (n = 20), with 90 children completing the study. The dmfs and DMFS indices were recorded annually. Each year, saliva was stimulated by chewing paraffin tablets (0.7 ± 0.1 g) for five minutes sometime between 8:30 and 9:00 a.m. Average SFR was expressed in mL/min. A MANOVA analysis was used to establish whether there was a correlation between SFR, caries, present teeth, and sex. Results: Average SFR increased with age. The MANOVA analysis revealed that the inter- and intra-individual variations in yearly averages were not significant (p = 0.627 for inter- and p = 0.824 for intra-). In the case of sex, significant differences were found only in the last year of study (p = 0.017). The baseline initial dmfs index was 5.2, dropping to 2.3 in the final year; the baseline DMFS index was 0.1, which subsequently increased to 1.5. In terms of distribution by sex, no significant differences were found in any case (p › 0.05). A linear regression analysis between baseline dmfs and SFR showed a correlation (p = 0.0031). There was also a correlation between final DMFS and annual SFR when adjusted for sex (p = 0.00949). Conclusion: SFR increases with age and is the same in males and females. There is a correlation between SFR and caries experience.


REFERENCES

  1. ten Cate JM, Larsen MJ, Pearce EIF, Fejerskov O. Chemical interactions between the tooth and oral fluids. In: Fejerskov O and Kidd E. Dental caries. The disease and its clinical management. Oxford, United Kingdom. Blackwell Munksgaard Ed; 2003, p. 3.

  2. ten Cate JM, Larsen MJ, Pearce EIF, Fejerskov O. Chemical interactions between the tooth and oral fluids. In : Dental caries. The disease and its clinical management. Second Edition. Edited by Fejerskov O & Kidd E. Edit. Blackwell Munsgaard. Oxford, United Kingdom. 2008, pp. 209-231.

  3. de Almeida PDV, Grégio AMT, Machado Mán, de Lima AAS, Azevedo LR. Saliva composition and functions: a comprehensive review. J Contemp Dent Pract. 2008; 9: 72-80.

  4. Dawes C. Circadian rhythms in human salivary flow rate and composition. J Physiol. 1972; 220: 529-545.

  5. Tenovuo J. Salivary parameters of relevance for assessing caries activity in individuals and populations. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 1997; 25: 82-86.

  6. Larmas M. Saliva and dental caries: diagnostic tests for normal dental practice. Int Dent J. 1992; 42: 199-208.

  7. Edgar WM, Higham SM, Manning RH. Saliva stimulation and caries prevention. Adv Dent Res. 1994; 8: 239-245.

  8. Shanon IL Climatological effects on human parotid gland function. Arch Oral Biol. 1998; 11: 451-453.

  9. World Health Organization. Oral Health Surveys. Basic Methods. 4 Edition. Geneva. 1997.

  10. Erickson S. The variability of human parotid flow rate on stimulation with citric acid, with special references to taste. Arch Oral Biol. 1971; 16: 9-19.

  11. Inoue H, Ono K, Masuda W, Morimoto Y, Tanaka T, Yokota M, Inenaga K. Gender difference in unstimulated whole saliva flow rate and salivary gland sizes. Arch Oral Biol. 2006; 51: 1055-1060.

  12. Heintze U, Birkhed D, Bjorn H. Secretion rate and buffer effect of resting and stimulated whole saliva as a function of age and sex. Swed Dent J. 1983; 7: 227-238.

  13. Dawes C. Factors influencing salivary flow rate ad composition. In: Saliva and oral health. Second Edition. Edited by Edgar WM & O’Mullane DM. Edit. British Dental Journal. London, United Kingdom. 1999, pp. 27-41.

  14. Bardow A, Lagerlof F, Nauntofte B, Tenovuo J. The role of saliva. In: Dental caries. The disease and its clinical management. Second Edition. Edited by Fejerskov O & Kidd E. Edit. Blackwell Munsgaard. Oxford, United Kingdom. 2008, pp. 190-207.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com

Mi perfil

C?MO CITAR (Vancouver)

Rev ADM. 2015;72