medigraphic.com
ISSN 1810-2352 (Print)

2015, Number 1

<< Back Next >>

Rev Cub Med Int Emerg 2015; 14 (1)

Inability in the patients for adverse events in the polyvalent intensive care unit

Mora PY, Hernández MZL, Cortizo HJA

Language: Spanish
References: 12
Page: 67-74
PDF size: 234.98 Kb.


ABSTRACT

Introduction: The security of the patient is based on the necessity of counteracting the noxious effects that have the adverse events on the patients.
Objective: Determining the impact, in term of inability, in the patients in which it was reported an incident or adverse event.
Method: Descriptive and prospective study in the polyvalent intensive care unit of the Provincial Hospital of Cienfuegos during the months of February-April 2010. The universe was constituted by the 110 admitted patients in the service during the period of study. For the notification of incident and adverse events, it was revised the international form of the SEMICYUC in order to determine the graveness according to category and their relationship with inability of the patient.
Results: The adverse events of higher prevalence are those of categories B and C for a total of 28.18% and 25.45% representing 31 and 28 mentioned incidents. Those of greater graveness are the incidents associated with the air road that occupies the 25.45% with 28 incidents. In spite of the existence of adverse events, the patients didn't suffer invalidating consequences in terms of physical inability.
Conclusions: it was identified the graveness of the adverse events and it was determined that there was not fatal invalidations in the patients that participated in the study.


REFERENCES

  1. Michel P, Quenon JL, de Sarasqueta AM, Scemama O. Comparison of three methods for estimating rates of adverse events and rates of preventable adverse events in acute care hospitals. BMJ. 2004;24:199.

  2. ISMP. 2004 ISMP Medication Safety Self Assessment® for Hospitals. 2004. [en linea] 2005 [Consultado 3 Ene 2012]. Disponible en: http://www.ismp.org/Survey/Hospital/Intro.htm

  3. Pardo R, Jara A, Menchen B, Padilla D, Martín J, Hernández J, et al. Puesta en marcha de una unidad de gestión de riesgos clínicos hospitalaria. Rev Calidad Asistencial. 2005;20:211-5. 73 Rev Cub Med Int Emerg 2015;14(1) Incapacidad en los pacientes por acontecimientos adversos en la UCIP

  4. Holzmueller CG, Pronovost PJ, Dickman F, Thompson DA, Wu AW, Lubomski LH, et al. Creating the web-based intensive care unit safety reporting system. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2005;12:130-9.

  5. Acontecimientos adversos en el enfermo crítico. XLI Congreso Nacional de la SEMICYUC. XXXII Congreso Nacional de la SEIUC. Pamplona 25-28 de junio 2006. [s.l]:[s.c]; 2006.

  6. Arbesú MA, Ramos M, Areces F. Pilotaje en la detección de errores de prescripción de citostáticos. Rev Cubana Farm. 2004;38(3).

  7. Michel P, Aranaz J, Limón R, Requena J. Siguiendo la pista de los efectos adversos: cómo detectarlos. Rev Calidad Asistencial. 2005;20:204-10.

  8. Aguiló J, Salvador P, García del Caño J, Muñoz C, Garay M, Viciano V. Experiencia en el estudio de efectos adversos en un servicio de cirugía general. Rev Calidad Asistencial. 2005;20:185-92.

  9. Monteagudo Romero J. Qué es y qué no es la Medicina Basada en Pruebas. La información médica y sus problemas. Evidencia [en linea]. 2006 Abr-Ago. [Consultado 3 Ene 2012];1(1): [aprox. 10 p.]. Disponible en: http://www.fisterra.com/mbe/mbe_temas/11/que_es.htm .

  10. 10.Ruiz J, Martín MC. Acerca de la evaluación del ejercicio de la medicina intensiva. Med Intensiva. 2004;28:70-4.

  11. 11.Otero M J, Alonso P, Maderuelo J A, Ceruelo J, Domínguez-Gil A,Sánchez A. Prevalencia y factores asociados a los acontecimientos adversos preve nibles por medicamentos que causan ingreso hospitalario. Farm Hosp. 2006;30:161-70.

  12. 12.Martín MC, Ruiz J. Acontecimientos adversos en Medicina Intensiva. Gestionando el riesgo. Med Intensiva. 2006;30:284-92.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com