medigraphic.com
SPANISH

Anales de Radiología, México

  • Contents
  • View Archive
  • Information
    • General Information        
    • Directory
  • Publish
    • Instructions for authors        
  • medigraphic.com
    • Home
    • Journals index            
    • Register / Login
  • Mi perfil

2015, Number 1

<< Back Next >>

Anales de Radiología México 2015; 14 (1)

Diagnosis by cross-sectional imaging of pseudomembranous colitis

Motta-Ramírez GA, Torres-Montoya JM, Martínez-Utrera MJ, Rebollo-Hurtado V, Guizar-López GU
Full text How to cite this article

Language: Spanish
References: 16
Page: 43-65
PDF size: 652.71 Kb.


Key words:

colitis, pseudomembranous enterocolitis, computed tomography, diagnosis.

ABSTRACT

Introduction: Pseudomembranous colitis is an infectious, potentially lethal colitis, caused by the release of one or more toxins produced by the unopposed proliferation of the bacterium Clostridium difficile. Pseudomembranous colitis is a predominantly hospital-acquired infection, secondary to complications from antibiotic treatment; it is also associated with abdominal surgery and with debilitating diseases such as lymphoma or AIDS.
Objective: Recognize the diagnostic code to identify and differentiate pseudomembranous colitis from other types of colitis by means of tomography, analyzing distribution, signs of accordion, double, and bull’s-eye sign; morphology of colon wall, mucosa, and pericolic fat; adenopathies or ascites; and some other specific extracolonic intra-abdominal findings. We relate the different patterns of these points with the corresponding types of colitis, focusing on pseudomembranous colitis.
Material and methods: We conducted a descriptive, observational, cross-section, retrospective, single-site study which included patients admitted to Hospital Central Militar with various clinical diagnoses, over a 3-year period (January 1, 2012, through December 31, 2014) and in whom the possibility of pseudomembranous colitis was identified based on history of pseudomembranous colitis or tomography findings.
Results: Our universe included 53 patients (45% men and 55% women) in orders for studies which required computed tomography; in none of them was use of antibiotics, type, time, or number specified. In relation to history of use of antibiotics associated with pseudomembranous colitis, 50 patients (94%) were identified. In 4% use of antibiotics was not associated with identification of pseudomembranous colitis by computed tomography. Only 2% were on treatment with unspecified oral antibiotics.
Conclusion: The colitides are part of highly common emergency abdominal pathology. Tomography findings, in their etiological diagnosis, are not pathognomonic; however, knowing them helps establish a correct diagnostic approach. Tomographic images are not pathognomonic but, combined with epidemiology and clinical findings, can support a diagnosis of strong probability, if not certainty. To arrive at a correct diagnosis of pseudomembranous colitis, we need to carefully analyze the points we have discussed in this article: distribution, sign of accordion or halo, colon wall morphology, mucosa, fat, adenopathies, ascites, and characteristic findings.


REFERENCES

  1. Thoeni RF, Cello JP. CT imaging of colitis. Radiology 2006;240:623 -638.

  2. Bouza Santiago E, Peláez García T y Catalán Alonso P. Enfermedad asociada a Clostridium difficile. Medicine 1998;7(74):3422-3426.

  3. Ash L, Baker ME, O’Malley CM, Gordon SM, Delaney CP y Obuchowski NA. Colonic abnormalities on CT in adult hospitalized patients with clostridium difficile colitis: Prevalence and significance of findings. AJR 2006;186:1393-400.

  4. Trudel JL. Clostridium difficile colitis. Clin Colon Rectal Surg 2007;20:13-17.

  5. Disponible en: http://www.elsevierinstituciones.com/ ficheros/booktemplate/9788475927220/files/Capitulo19. pdf

  6. Macari M, Balthazar EJ, Megibow AJ. The accordion sign at CT: A nonspecific finding in patients with colonic edema. Radiology 1999;211:743-6.

  7. Ahualli J, Méndez Uriburu L, Cikman P, Carpinella JJ. Tomografía computada en las lesiones inflamatorias del colon. RAR 2006;70(4):297-306.

  8. Eaton SR, Mazuski JE. Overview of severe clostridium difficile infection. Crit Care Clin 2013;29:827–39.

  9. Motta-Ramirez GA, Ruiz Arteaga JD, González Sánchez CB. Abordaje diagnóstico por tomografía computada del engrosamiento de la pared colónica y su correlación endoscópica en pacientes del Hospital Ángeles del Pedregal. Endoscopia 2010;22(Suplemento 1):14-25.

  10. Csendes GP, Salas ZA, Herquiñigo RD, Sanhueza SA, Aldana VH. Semiología del intestino en Tomografía Computada: del blanco al negro. Rev Chilena de Cirugía 2008;60(1);22-8.

  11. Garma Martínez AG, Ricardez García JA, Blas Azotla R, Sandoval García JP, Gutiérrez del Río FJ, Vicencio Tovar A. Megacolon tóxico por colitis pseudomembranosa. Acta Médica Grupo Ángeles. 2011;9(4):217-20.

  12. de Ariño Suárez M. Colitis pseudomembranosa: ¿nuevas toxinas? Revista de Gastroenterología de México 2010;Supl.1(75):120-3.

  13. Canales-Simón MR, Gil de Gómez-Barragán MJ y A.M. Vázquez-Medrano AM. Colitis pseudomembranosa en atención primaria. Semergen. 2010;36(10):593–6.

  14. Disponible en: http://www.eurorad.org/eurorad/case. php?id=1368&lang=es

  15. Kirkpatrick ID, Greenberg HM. Evaluating the CT diagnosis of Clostridium difficile colitis: should CT guide therapy? AJR 2001;176(3):635-9.

  16. Boland GW, Lee MJ, Cats AM, Ferraro MJ, Matthia AR, Mueller PR. Clostridium difficile colitis: correlation of CT findings with severity of clinical disease. Clin Radiol. 1995;50(3):153-6.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com

Mi perfil

C?MO CITAR (Vancouver)

Anales de Radiología México. 2015;14