medigraphic.com
SPANISH

Ginecología y Obstetricia de México

Federación Mexicana de Ginecología y Obstetricia, A.C.
  • Contents
  • View Archive
  • Information
    • General Information        
    • Directory
  • Publish
    • Instructions for authors        
  • medigraphic.com
    • Home
    • Journals index            
    • Register / Login
  • Mi perfil

2015, Number 05

<< Back Next >>

Ginecol Obstet Mex 2015; 83 (05)

Non invasive prenatal test (NIPT) in maternal blood by parallel massive sequencing. Initial experience in Mexican women and literature review

Hernández-Gómez M, Ramírez-Arroyo E, Meléndez-Hernández R, Garduño-Zarazúa LM, Mayén-Molina DG
Full text How to cite this article

Language: Spanish
References: 21
Page: 277-288
PDF size: 401.78 Kb.


Key words:

non-invasive prenatal test (NIPT), cell-free-fetal DNA (cffDNA), prenatal screening.

ABSTRACT

Background: Discovery of cell-free fetal DNA (cffDNA) in maternal blood in 1997 by Lo et al. has opened the possibility of a non-invasive prenatal test (NIPT). Currently, it is employed in the analysis of aneuploidies and fetal sex determination. Massive parallel sequencing (MPS) detects the origin of each amplified sequence, and analyses over-representation of sequences or any decrease in the fetal chromosomes in maternal plasma. This technique has been validated and allows assessment of trisomies 13, 18 and 21, obtaining the result in about a week from 10-weeks of gestational age. By using NIPT, we expect a reduction in the number of invasive studies and the risk of fetal loss.
Objective: To communicate the experience obtained at Genetics Clinic of the Hospital Angeles Lomas, in the use of NIPT by MPS as a method of prenatal screening for aneuploidies and fetal sex determination.
Material and methods: A prospective, observational and descriptive study was carried out in order to develop a database of patients who underwent NIPT (Harmony test®) from August 2013 to date. Maternal blood samples were analyzed at Ariosa Diagnostics Inc. at San Jose California, USA.
Results: Non-invasive prenatal test was applied to 42 patients, with average maternal age of 37.1 years. The percentage of gestational age was 13.3 weeks and of fetal fraction was 12.7%. Two cases of high risk of trisomy 18 and two cases with high risk for X monosomy were obtained. In only one case the test was used for fetal determination, because of a story of Wiskott-Aldrich (W-A) disease. In all cases of low risk, the result was confirmed at birth and fetal sex was consistent with reports of literature.
Conclusions: NIPT is currently the screening test with the highest detection rate (greater than 98%, with a false negative rate lesser than 0.5% and a sensitivity and specificity close to 100%), although it can vary from one chromosome to another. It is indicated for women with a result of high risk for trisomy 13, 18 and 21. This test has not been validated for low risk women or multiple pregnancies. In our series, the most frequent indication was advanced maternal age. The weight of the patients is important because it is a factor related to the percentage of fetal DNA. In cases with high risk for X monosomy in which the cytogenetic result was 46,XX, it is important to consider as much causes as possible, such as uniparental disomy (UPD), mosaicism and maternal contamination. Only in a case with W-A story the test was conducted specifically for fetal sex determination and confirmed by amniocentesis. In the cases of high-risk results, confirmation by an invasive method, before an obstetric decision, is indispensable. Further studies are still needed to continue the validation of this test by different molecular techniques and in other groups of patients.


REFERENCES

  1. Gil M, et al. Cell-free DNA analysis for trisomy risk assessment in first-trimester twin pregnancies. Fetal Diagn Ther 2013;35(3):182-189.

  2. Mersy E, et al. Noninvasive detection of fetal trisomy 21: systematic review and report of quality and outcomes of diagnostic accuracy studies performed between 1997 and 2012. Hum Reprod Update 2013:dmt001.

  3. Skirton H, Patch C. Factors affecting the clinical use of non‐invasive prenatal testing: a mixed methods systematic review. Pren Diagn 2013;33(6):532-541.

  4. Wilson K, et al. NSGC practice guideline: prenatal screening and diagnostic testing options for chromosome aneuploidy. J Genet Couns 2013;22(1):4-15.

  5. Wright CF. Cell-free nucleic acids for non-invasive prenatal diagnosis. Report of the UK expert working group. Foundation for Genomics and Population Health, 2009.

  6. Norwitz ER, Levy B. Noninvasive prenatal testing: the future is now. Rev Obstet Gynecol 2013;6(2):48-62.

  7. Group TNPSW. ACMG statement on noninvasive prenatal screening for fetal aneuploidy. Genet Med 2013;15(5):395- 398.

  8. Obstetricians, ACo and Gynecologists. Noninvasive prenatal testing for fetal aneuploidy. Committee Opinion No. 545. Obstet Gynecol 2012;120:1532-1534.

  9. Benn P, et al. Prenatal detection of Down Syndrome using Massively Parallel Sequencing (MPS): a rapid response statement from a committee on behalf of the Board of the International Society for Prenatal Diagnosis, 24 October 2011. Prenat Diagn 2012;32(1):1-2.

  10. Sparks AB, et al. Selective analysis of cell‐free DNA in maternal blood for evaluation of fetal trisomy. Prenat Diagn 2012;32(1):3-9.

  11. Chiu RW, et al. Non-invasive prenatal assessment of trisomy 21 by multiplexed maternal plasma DNA sequencing: large scale validity study. BMJ 2011;342:c7401.doi: 10.1136/bmj.c7401.

  12. Juneau K, et al. Microarray-based cell-free DNA analysis improves noninvasive prenatal testing. Fetal DiagnTher 2014;36(4):282-286.

  13. Bianchi DW, et al. Genome-wide fetal aneuploidy detection by maternal plasma DNA sequencing. Obstet Gynecol 2012;119(5):890-901.

  14. Bianchi DW, et al. DNA sequencing versus standard prenatal aneuploidy screening. N Engl J Med 2014;370(9):799- 808.

  15. Devaney SA, et al. Non-invasive fetal sex determination using cell-free fetal DNA: a systematic review and metaanalysis. JAMA 2011;306(6):627-636.

  16. Verweij E, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of non-invasive detection of fetal trisomy 21 in maternal blood: a systematic review. Fetal Diagn Ther 2011;31(2):81-86.

  17. Norton ME, et al. Non-Invasive Chromosomal Evaluation (NICE) Study: results of a multicenter prospective cohort study for detection of fetal trisomy 21 and trisomy 18. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2012;207(2):137,e1-137. e8.

  18. Wright CF, et al. Non-invasive prenatal diagnostic test accuracy for fetal sex using cell-free DNA a review and meta-analysis. BMC Res Notes 2012; 5(1):476.

  19. Jiang F, et al. Non-invasive Fetal Trisomy (NIFTY) test: an advanced noninvasive prenatal diagnosis methodology for fetal autosomal and sex chromosomal aneuploidies. BMC Med Genomics 2012;5(1): 57.

  20. Mazloom AR, et al. Non-invasive prenatal detection of sex chromosomal aneuploidies by sequencing circulating cell‐free DNA from maternal plasma. Prenat Diagn 2013;33(6):591-597.

  21. Langlois SB. Current status in non-invasive prenatal detection of Down syndrome, trisomy 18, and trisomy 13 using cell-free DNA in maternal plasma. J Obstet Gynaecol Can 2013;35(2):177-181.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com

Mi perfil

C?MO CITAR (Vancouver)

Ginecol Obstet Mex. 2015;83