medigraphic.com
ISSN 3061-8142 (Electronic)
ISSN 0484-7903 (Print)

2015, Number S1

<< Back Next >>

Rev Mex Anest 2015; 38 (S1)

Cardiac output versus central venous oxygen saturation and its relation to parameters of tissue perfusion in the cardiac surgery patient of the Hospital CMN SXXI, 2014

Orozco-Bedolla J, Castellanos-Olivares A

Language: Spanish
References: 6
Page: 273-275
PDF size: 183.33 Kb.


Text Extraction

No abstract.


REFERENCES

  1. Litton E, Silbert B, Ho KM. Clinical predictors of a low central venous oxygen saturation after major surgery: a prospective prevalence study. Anaesthesia and Intensive Care. 2015;43:59-65.

  2. Marik P, Monnet X, Teboul JL. Hemodynamic parameters to guide fluid therapy. Annals of Intensive Care. 2011;1:1-9.

  3. Pearse R, et al. Effect of a perioperative, cardiac output–guided hemodynamic therapy algorithm on outcomes following major gastrointestinal surgery. A randomized clinical trial and systematic review. JAMA. 2014;311:2181-2190.

  4. Habicher M, von-Heymann C, Spies C, Wernecke K, Sander M. Central venous-arterial pCO2 and pH difference identifies microcirculatory hypoperfusion in cardiac surgical patients with normal central venous oxygen saturation: a retrospective analysis. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2014;1-10. [Article in press].

  5. Sheehan A, Columb M. Two goals, one shot at survival: DPCO2 and ScvO2. European Journal of Anaesthesiology. 2014;31:361-362.

  6. van Beest PA, Lont MC, Holman ND, Loef B, Kuiper MA, Boerma EC. Central venous-arterial pCO2 difference as a tool in resuscitation of septic patients. Intensive Care Med. 2013;39:1034-1039.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com