medigraphic.com
SPANISH

Revista Mexicana de Patología Clínica y Medicina de Laboratorio

ISSN 0185-6014 (Print)
Órgano oficial de difusión de la Federación Mexicana de Patología Clínica, AC y de la Asociación Latinoamericana de Patología Clínica/Medicina de Laboratorio
  • Contents
  • View Archive
  • Information
    • General Information        
    • Directory
  • Publish
    • Instructions for authors        
  • medigraphic.com
    • Home
    • Journals index            
    • Register / Login
  • Mi perfil

2002, Number 2

<< Back Next >>

Rev Mex Patol Clin Med Lab 2002; 49 (2)

Evaluation of the impact of lactose intolerance in the osteoporosis risk

Terrés-Speziale AM, Casas TLT
Full text How to cite this article

Language: Spanish
References: 16
Page: 77-84
PDF size: 234.86 Kb.


Key words:

Lactase, lactose intolerance, osteoporosis, bone densitometry.

ABSTRACT

Background: Osteoporosis (OP) is a chronic degenerative condition that weakens bones while increasing chances of column, hip and forearm fractures. Lactose intolerance (LI) is a disease characterized by several clinical symptoms including diarrhea after milk intake, causing a reduction on dairy consumption. Objective: To study a cohort of adult healthy females, in order to establish lactose intolerance frequency, symptoms, milk consumption, and to determine existent relation among lactose intolerance and several osteoporosis risk factors. 1. BMI: Body mass index (kg/m2); 2. BDM: Bone densitometry, 3. UBM: Urinary bone markers. Method: Clinical, prospective, observational, descriptive and comparative protocol on a cohort of women attended for preventive medical evaluation on a specialized osteoporosis clinic during the first trimester of 2002. Results: One hundred and forty one women were evaluated with an age range of 36 to 65 years. Lactose intolerance was found on 22%; this group consumes less milk products (12%) and food supplements (7%) than the milk digesters group. No difference was found on BMI (kg/m2). Patients with lactose intolerance have a shorter bone calcium reserve and a slower bone remodeling activity, since they had a deeper T-Score on densitometry (p ‹ 0.05) plus a smaller calciuria (p › 0.05), with less urinary N-Telopeptides (p ‹ 0.05). This phenomenon, on lactase intolerance patients may well be explained through a compensatory homeostatic mechanism in order to maintain healthier bones. Discussion: Lactase intolerance has a strong relation with osteoporosis. On lactase intolerance management it is important to teach patients about non-lactose milk supplemented with calcium and vitamin D. Hormones and antiresortive medication should be restricted to specific cases with emphasis on climacteric patients that have osteoporosis with demonstrated hipercalciuria and increased urinary N-Telopeptides.


REFERENCES

  1. Peck WA. Consensus development conference: Diagnosis, prophylaxis and treatment of osteoporosis. Am J Med 1993; 94: 646-650.

  2. Riggs BL, Melton LJ III. Involutional osteoporosis. N Engl J Med 1986; 314: 1676-1686.

  3. Kanis JA. Causas de la osteoporosis. En: Kanis JA (ed). Osteoporosis. Londres: Blackwell Science, 1996: 93-129.

  4. Tamayo et al. How frequent is osteoporosis? J Bone Min Res 1997.

  5. Terrés SAM. Marcadores biológicos de envejecimiento. Rev Mex Pat Clin 2000: 47 (2): 119-120.

  6. Terrés SAM. Marcadores biológicos de envejecimiento en el hombre mexicano. Rev Med IMSS 2001; 39 (3): 199-206.

  7. Kanis JA. Bone density measurement: a systemic review. J Intern Med 1997; 739: 1-60.

  8. Terrés SAM. Edad ósea: estimación densitométrica y metabólica. Rev Mex Patol Clin 2002; 49 (1): 7-14.

  9. Bente JR. Biochemical markers of bone turnover in diagnosis and assessment of therapy. Am J Med 1991; 58: 645-685.

  10. Larracilla AJ, García M, Valencia J, Peñaloza J, Solórzano F. Intolerancia a la lactosa: Generalidades sobre su diagnóstico y tratamiento. Salud Pub Mex 1984; 26: 163-169.

  11. Rosado JL, Solomons NW, Lisker R, Bourges H. Enzyme replacement therapy for primary adult lactase deficiency. Gastroenterology 1984; 87: 1072-1082.

  12. Rosado JL, Morales M, Pasquetti A. Lactose digestion and clinical tolerance to milk, lactose prehydrolyzed milk and enzyme? added milk: A study in undernourished continuously enteral? fed patients. J Parent Enteral Nutr 1989; 13: 157- 161.

  13. Rosado JL, González C, Valencia ME, López P, Palma M, López B et al. Lactose maldigestion and milk intolerance. A study in rural and urban Mexico using physiological doses of milk. J Nutr 1994; 124: 1052-1059.

  14. Scrimshaw NS, Murray EB. The acceptability of milk and milk products in populations with a high prevalence of lactose intolerance. Am J Clin Nutr 1988; 48 (suppl): 1083-1159.

  15. Terrés SAM, Casas TLT. Enfermedad diarreica e intolerancia a la lactosa en México. Rev Med IMSS 2002; (40) 4: 329-341.

  16. Casas TLT, Terrés SAM. Implicaciones de la lactosa en salud pública y tecnología de los alimentos. Rev Med IMSS 2002 (en prensa).




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com

Mi perfil

C?MO CITAR (Vancouver)

Rev Mex Patol Clin Med Lab. 2002;49