medigraphic.com
SPANISH

Revista Mexicana de Angiología

Órgano Oficial de la Sociedad Mexicana de Angiología y Cirugía Vascular
  • Contents
  • View Archive
  • Information
    • General Information        
    • Directory
  • Publish
    • Instructions for authors        
  • medigraphic.com
    • Home
    • Journals index            
    • Register / Login
  • Mi perfil

2015, Number 2

<< Back Next >>

Rev Mex Angiol 2015; 43 (2)

Técnica quirúrgica simple de resolución en la enfermedad ateromatosa extracraneal carotídea

Flores-Izar FJ, Baeza-Galván BI, Bizueto-Rosas H, Hugo Alonso Pérez-González HA, Gómez-Calvo CD, Hernández-Pérez NA
Full text How to cite this article

Language: Spanish
References: 13
Page: 70-76
PDF size: 269.20 Kb.


Key words:

Carotid endarterectomy, elongations arterial, restenosis.

ABSTRACT

Background. Atherosclerotic carotid disease and vessel elongation increase its frequency among older patients. Female sex, smoking, hypertension, dyslipidemia, diabetes mellitus 2, clamping time, miointimal hyperplasia, number and type of anastomosis are considered risk factors for carotid restenosis.
Objective. To simplify the surgical management of atheroslcerotic carotid disease.
Material and methods. Twenty-two patients were included from March 2012 to February 2015, all of them underwent surgery for carotid disease with elongated vessel; 17 men and 5 women, with an average age of 73 years. Patients had arterial hypertension in 90%, smokers 45%, dyslipidemic 68%, and diabetics 36%. We reviewed the clinical records in search of complications during and after the surgery; clamping time, haematoma, infection, and restenosis.
Results. Twenty unilateral carotid endarterectomies with resection of the elongation of the internal carotid artery in 22 patients and in 3 patients with resection of the common carotid artery elongation; carotid stenosis were between 65-90% and six patients withouth significant stenosis but with brain hypoperfusion. In one patient was required to rebuild the previous internal carotid anastomosis because residual stenosis of 50 %, describing a narrow angle between both carotid arteries internal and external, requiring a clamping time of 22 min. The follow-up showed that patients didn’t have complications in the early stage and in the follow-up continued without data failure syndrome of baroreceptor.
Conclusion. The candidates for carotid endarterectomy should be integrally evaluated, identifying the treatment according to risk factors in order to optimize the results, reducing the morbidity and mortality and improving their post-surgical prognosis. A minor time of clamping, eliminate areas that may generate embolism or thrombosis, a simple and unique anastomosis all meet the basic principles for the standards of vascular anastomoses.


REFERENCES

  1. Malek LA, Malek AK, Leszczynski J, Toutounchi S, Elwertowski M, Spiewak M, et al. Carotid clamping time as a risk factor for early restenosis after carotid endarterectomy. EJVES 2005; 30: 143-6.

  2. Roseborough GS, Perler BA. Carotid Artery Disease: Endarterectomy. In: Cronenwett JL, Johnston KW (eds.). Rutherford’s Vascular Surgery. 7th Ed. Philadelphia: Saunders; 2010, p. 2090.

  3. Cao P, Giordano G, De Rango P, Zannetti S, Chiesa R, Coppi G, et al. Eversion versus conventional carotid endarterectomy: late results of a prospective multicenter randomized trial. J Vasc Surg 2000; 31: 19-30.

  4. Rerkasem K, Rothwell PM. Systematic review of randomized controlled trials of patch angioplasty versus primary closure and different types of patch during carotid endarterectomy. Asian J Surg 2011; 34(1): 32-40.

  5. Lye M, Vargas E, Faragher EB, Davies I, Goddard C. Haemodynamic and neurohumoral responses in elderly patients with postural hypotension. Eur J Clin Invest 1990; 20: 90-6.

  6. Mukerji N, Seetharam K, Prasad KS, Vivar R, Mendelow AD. Carotid endarterectomy - Safe and effective in a Neurosurgeon’s hands: a 25 years single surgeon experience. World Neurosurgery 2015; 83(1): 74-9.

  7. Schwartz SM, deBlois D, O’Brien ERM. The intima: soil for atherosclerosis and restenosis. Circ Res 1995; 77: 445-65.

  8. Barnett HJ, Taylor DW, Eliasziw M, Fox AJ, Ferguson GG, Haynes RB, et al. Benefit of carotid endarterectomy in patients with symptomatic moderate or severe stenosis. N Engl J Med 1998; 339: 1415-25.

  9. Coyle KA, Smith III RB, Chapman RL, Salam AA, Dodson TF, Lumsden AB, et al. Carotid artery shortening: a safe adjunct to carotid endarterectomy. J Vasc Surg 1995; 22: 257-63.

  10. Archie JP. Carotid endarterectomy with reconstruction techniques tailored to operative findings. J Vasc Surg 1993; 17: 141-51.

  11. Chino ES. A simple method for combined carotid endarterectomy and correction of internal carotid artery kinking. J Vasc Surg 1987; 6(2): 197-9.

  12. Ballotta E, Thiene G, Baracchini C, Ermani M, Militello C, Da Glau G, et al. Surgical vs. medical treatment for isolated internal carotid artery elongation with coiling or kinking in symptomatic patients: a prospective randomized clinical study. J Vasc Surg 2005; 42(5): 838-46.

  13. Arnulf G, Sautot J. Pathologie et chirurgie des carótides: Modern techniques in surgery. In: Arnulf G (eds.). Vascular Surgery. Vol. VI. Switzerland: Lausanne; 1957, p. 12200-4.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com

Mi perfil

C?MO CITAR (Vancouver)

Rev Mex Angiol. 2015;43