medigraphic.com
ISSN 1684-1859 (Print)

2015, Number 1

<< Back Next >>

Revista Cubana de Informática Médica 2015; 7 (1)

Process of tests and suite of tools of informatics solve for the health

Castilla BRC, Barrera PO, Fernández PLG, Cabrera HM, González CL

Language: Spanish
References: 18
Page: 56-72
PDF size: 902.21 Kb.


ABSTRACT

With the strategy outlined by the Ministry of Public Health to achieve the informatization have been created a group of computer systems able to automate that previously you toward in a manual way. as the Group Management Integration Solutions (GIS), belonging to the company SOFTEL, Ministry of Information and Communications, in charge of carrying out a group of tests with a series of tools to reduce the resources dedicated to this activity and to increase bigger quality and reliability and with the smallest number of possible errors. This work details each process of tests with the tools to use for each process process where the objective is to provide processes that allow dissimilar to use automated testing tools as a suite which validate software applications developed for the National Health System. This minimize the occurrence of errors, the results are automating unit, functional and regression of all developing test systems; as well as testing web services allowing considerable reduction of delay time test systems and the number of errors detected by application users.


REFERENCES

  1. Vidal M, De Armas Y. Estrategias de informatización del Sector de la Salud (I). Revista InformáticaMédica. 2002;11(4):24-7.

  2. Dirección Informática MINSAP. Marco Regulatorio, GIS-07.01. La Habana, 2009.

  3. Osterweil L. Strategic Direction in Software Quality. ACM COMPUTING SURVEYS 1996[citado 2014 Dic];8(4):329-46. Disponible en: http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/showciting?cid=1681212

  4. Wordpress. Definición de SQA. [citado 2014 Dic]. Disponible en: https://clauyazmin22.wordpress.com/2012/02/24/definicion-de-sqa/

  5. Hetzel B. The Complete Guide to Software Testing. John Wiley&Sons. Second Edition. United States; 1993. ISBN 0-89435-242-3.

  6. Runeson P, Andersson C, Thelin T. What Do We Know about Defect Detection Methods? IEEE Software 2006;23(3):82-90.

  7. Tian J. Software Quality Engineering, IEEE Computer Society. Estados Unidos; 2005. ISBN: 0-471-71345-7.

  8. Craig RD, Jaskiel SP. Systematic Software Testing, Artech House Publishers. Boston; 2002.

  9. Kit E. Software Testing in the Real World, Addison- Wesley. Gran Bretaña; 1995. ISBN: 0785342877564.

  10. Boehm BW. Improving software Productivity. IEEE Computer. 2006.

  11. Koomen T, van der Aalst L, Broekman B, Vroon M. TMap Next for result-driven testing. UTN Publishers. Netherlands; 2006. ISBN 90-72194-79-9.

  12. Weigelt C. The impact of outsourcing new technologies on integrative capabilities and performance. Strategic Management Journal 2009[citado 2014 Dic];30(6):595-616. Disponible en: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/smj.v30:6/issuetoc

  13. Carnegie Mellon University. Software Engineering Institute (SEI). CMMi® for Development 2010. CERT's Podcast Series:Security for Business Leaders. [citado 2014 Dic];Versión 1.3. Savannah, Georgia. Disponible en: http://www.sei.cmu.edu/library/assets/022510.pdf

  14. Burnstein I. Practical Software Testing. Springer-Verlag. Chicago, USA; 2003.

  15. Van E, Wells B. Test Maturity Model Integration (TMMi) (Guidelines for Test Process Improvement) 2012.

  16. Koomen T. Test process improvement: a practical step-by-step guide to structured testing. Addison-Wesley. Great Britain; 1999.

  17. Sanz A, Saldaña J, García J, Gaitero D. TestPAI: Un área de proceso de pruebas integrada con CMMI. REICIS 2008[citado 2014 Dic];4(4):6-20. Disponible en: http://www.researchgate.net/publication/228729310_TestPAI_Un_rea_de_proceso_de_pruebas_integrada_con_CMMI

  18. Betancourt L. Proceso de prueba de un software. [Internet] [citado 2014 Dic]. Disponible en: http://revista.jovenclub.cu/?p=789




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com