medigraphic.com
SPANISH

Veterinaria México

  • Contents
  • View Archive
  • Information
    • General Information        
    • Directory
  • Publish
    • Instructions for authors        
  • medigraphic.com
    • Home
    • Journals index            
    • Register / Login
  • Mi perfil

2001, Number 1

<< Back Next >>

Vet Mex 2001; 32 (1)

Productive and reproductive evaluation of two groups of 3-breed crossbred goats under confinement conditions in the Venezuelan

Dickson UL, Torres HG, Becerril PCM, González CF, Rangel SR, García BE
Full text How to cite this article

Language: English/Spanish
References: 15
Page: 33-38
PDF size: 44.02 Kb.


Key words:

CROSSBRED GOATS, PRODUCTIVE PERFORMANCE, CONFINEMENT, DRY TROPICS, VENEZUELA.

ABSTRACT

This study was carried out to evaluate the productive and reproductive performance of two groups of 3-breed crossbred goats with 50% Alpine, 25% Nubian and 25% Native (AND); and 50% Nubian, 25% Alpine and 25% Native (NAD), that were kept under confinement conditions in the Venezuelan dry tropics. Milk production (MP), lactation length (LL), prolificacy (P), kidding interval (KI) and gestation length (GL) were analyzed using a linear mixed model that included the effects of each genetic group (AND, NAD). Goats nested within genetic group, kidding number (1-5), kidding year (1990-1995) and kidding season (dry, rainy). Overall means were: 126.3 ± 62.3 kg for MP, 197.5 ± 75.6 days for LL, 1.21 ± 0.4 kids/parturition for P, 441.4 ± 121.4 days for KI and 149.2 ± 3.1 days for GL. A significant effect (P ‹ 0.05, P ‹ 0.01) of the genetic group was found on all of the variables studied, except on lactation length. Least-squares means for AND and NAD for MP, LL, P, KI and GL were: 132.7 ± 13.2 and 96.6 ± 17.1 kg, 1.32 ± 0.06 and 1.03 ± 0.08 kids/parturition, 439.4 ± 36.0 and 382.0 ± 43.5 days, and 149.4 ± 0.59 and 147.7 ± 0.83 days, respectively. Kidding year had a significant effect (P ‹ 0.01) on all of the variables, except on prolificacy. Kidding number affected (P ‹ 0.01) both the kidding interval and the gestation length. It is concluded that the AND group had a superior performance than the NAD one under environmental and management conditions of the Venezuelan dry tropics.


REFERENCES

  1. García BO, García BE, Bravo PJ, Kennedy B. Mejoramiento genético de caprinos criollos de Venezuela mediante el cruzamiento con razas importadas. IV Producción de leche. Memorias de la IX Reunión de la Asociación Latinoamericana de Producción Animal (ALPA); 1983 julio 21-25; Santiago de Chile, Chile. Maracay, Venezuela: ALPA y Fondo Nacional de Investigaciones Agropecuarias, 1983:18;156 (Resumen).

  2. 2. Sahni KL, Chawla DS. Crossbreeding of dairy goats for milk production. Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Goat Production and Disease; 1982 January 10-15; Tucson (AZ). Scottsdale (AZ): Dairy Goat Journal Co., 1982:575-583.

  3. 3. García BO, García BE, Bravo J, Bradford E. Análisis de un experimento de cruzamiento usando caprinos criollos e importados. VII. Producción de leche y evaluación de grupos raciales. Rev Fac Agron (LUZ) 1996;13:611-625.

  4. 4. Shelton M. Breed use and crossbreeding in goat production. Proceedings of the 3rd World Congress on Genetics Applied to Livestock Production; 1986 July 21-25; Lincoln (Ne). Lincoln (Ne): University of Nebraska, 1986:523-531.

  5. 5. Dickson UL, Torres HG, Becerril PC, García BO. Producción de leche y duración de la lactancia en cabras (Capra hircus) Alpinas y Nubias importadas a Venezuela. Vet Méx 2000;31:21-26.

  6. 6. Holdridge L. Ecología basada en zonas de vida. San José, Costa Rica: Instituto Interamericano de Cooperación Agrícola (IICA), 1987.

  7. 7. SAS. SAS System for linear models. 3rd ed. Cary (NC): SAS Institute Inc., 1992.

  8. 8. Montaldo H, Tapia G, Juárez A. Algunos factores genéticos y ambientales que influyen sobre la producción de leche y el intervalo entre partos en cabras. Téc Pecu Méx 1981;41:32-44.

  9. 9. Montaldo H, Juarez A, Berruecos JM, Sanchez F. Performance of local goats and their backcrosses with several breeds in Mexico. Small Rum Res 1995;16:97-105.

  10. 10. Rana Z, Chopra S, Balaine D. Comparative performance of Beetal goats and its crosses with French Alpine and Anglo-Nubian. Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Goat Production and Disease; 1982 January 10-15; Tucson (AZ). Scottsdale (AZ): Dairy Goat Journal Co., 1982:350 (Resumen).

  11. 11. Zygoyiannis D. A study of genetic and phenotypic parameters for milk yield and milk characteristics in indigenous and crossbred goats in Greece. Wld Rev Anim Prod 1994;29:20-28.

  12. 12. Wilson T, Murayi T. Productivity of the Small East-African goat and its crosses with the Anglo Nubian and the Alpine in Rwanda. Trop Anim Hlth Prod 1988;20:219-228.

  13. 13. Chawla DS, Bhatnagar DS. Reproductive performance of dairy goats. Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Goat Production and Disease; 1982 January 10-15; Tucson (AZ). Scottsdale (AZ): Dairy Goat Journal Co., 1982:304 (Resumen).

  14. 14. Mourad M. Estimation of repeatability of litter size of common African goats and crosses with Alpine in Rwanda. Small Rum Res 1996;19:263-266.

  15. 15. Montaldo M, Sanchez F, Juarez A, Forat M, Rosales J. A study on gestation length in five breeds of goats. Proceedings of the International Conference on Goats; 1987 March 8-13; Brasilia, Brasil. Brasilia, Brasil: EMBRAPA-DPP, 1987:1326 (Resumen).




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com

Mi perfil

C?MO CITAR (Vancouver)

Vet Mex. 2001;32