medigraphic.com
SPANISH

Revista Mexicana de Trasplantes

ISSN 2007-6800 (Print)
  • Contents
  • View Archive
  • Information
    • General Information        
    • Directory
  • Publish
    • Instructions for authors        
    • Send manuscript
  • Policies
  • medigraphic.com
    • Home
    • Journals index            
    • Register / Login
  • Mi perfil

2015, Number 2

<< Back Next >>

Rev Mex Traspl 2015; 4 (2)

Recording and analysis of consent for organ donation, tissue and cells for transplantation in Veracruz City

Zilli-Hernández S, Lajud-Barquín FA, Castillo-Montes MJ, Gómez-Díaz A, Torres-Castelán JA, Rodríguez-Fernández A, Martínez-Mier G
Full text How to cite this article

Language: Spanish
References: 16
Page: 46-56
PDF size: 282.71 Kb.


Key words:

Organ and tissue donation, sociodemographic characteristics, organ donor profile.

ABSTRACT

Introduction: Organ transplantation has become one of the most efficient therapeutic strategies to save and improve the quality of life for people diagnosed with terminal disease. The demographic, economic, cultural and religious characteristics play an important role in the variation on the decision of people whether to become an organ and tissues donor or not. Material and methods: 1,998 surveys of people who wanted to purchase a gift card from the CENATRA were analyzed. We evaluate the different sociodemographic characteristics that were associated with the desire to donate organs and tissues.Results: The 70.9% of respondents were female and 29.1% male. The most common age group was between 31-60 years of age with 59%. People who were not living with a partner corresponded to 50.7%. Non-university population accounted for 47.4%. In the profession, it found that 10.7% performing work related health services. The urban population corresponded to a 98.3% majority. 80.9% were beneficiaries of the IMSS. It was found that most donors practice the Catholic religion represented a 70.3%. With regard to donate organs and tissues analyzed the heart decided to donate 96.7%, 96.5% liver, kidneys 97.6%, 95.2% lungs, pancreas 94.3%, 93.1% bone, skin 92.9%, 95.8% and 92.2% other corneas.Conclusion: It was found that the most common demographic characteristics that influence the desire for donation include: sex, age, marital status, level of education, profession, type of population, social security, religion and type of organs and tissues.


REFERENCES

  1. Çolak M, Ersoy K, Haberal M, Gürdamar D, Gerçek Ö. A Household study to determine attitudes and beliefs related to organ transplantation and donation: A pilot study in YapracIk village, Ankara, Turkey. Transplantation proceedings. 2008; 40: 29-33.

  2. http://www.cenatra.salud.gob.mx/interior/trasplante_estadisticas.html

  3. Barcellos FC, Araujo CL, Da Costa JD. Organ donation: a population-based study. Clinical Transplantation. 2005; 19: 33-37.

  4. Cameron AM, Massie AB, Alexander CE, Stewart B, Montgo­mery RA, Benavides NR, Fleming GD, Segev DL. Social Media and Organ donor registration: The Facebook Effect. American Journal of Transplantation. 2013; 13: 2059-2065.

  5. Heuer M, Hertel S, Wirges U, Philipp T, Gerken G, Paul A, Kaiser GM. Evaluation of organ donor card holders among public officials of a Major German City. Transplantation proceedings. 2009; 41: 2505-2508.

  6. Baughn D, Rodrigue JR, Cornell DL. Intention to register as organ donors: a survey of adolescents. Prog Transplant. 2006; 16 (3): 260-267.

  7. Haustein SV, Sellers MT. Factors associated with (un)willingness to be an organ donor: importance of public exposure and knowledge. Clinical Transplantation. 2004; 18: 193-200.

  8. Ebony Boulware L, Ratner LE, Sosa AS, Cooper LA, LaVeist TA, Powe NR. Determinants of willingness to donate living related and cadaveric organs: Identifying opportunities for intervention. Transplantation. Lippincott Williams & wilkins, Inc. 2002; 73: 1683-1691.

  9. Mossialos E, Costa-Font J, Rudisill C. Does organ donation le­gislation affect individuals’ willingness to donate their own or their relative’s organs? Evidence from European Union survey data. BMC Health Services Research. 2008; 8: 48.

  10. Martínez-Mier G, Lara-Gutiérrez J, García-Esquina JL, Alvarado Arenas R, Méndez-López MT, Budar-Fernández LF, Soto-Miranda E, Hernández-Maldonado EJ, Trujillo-Martínez MF, Uscanga-Montesano A, González-Velázquez F. Revista Mexicana de Trasplantes. 2014; 3: 90-94.

  11. Symvoulakis EK, Komninos ID, Antonakis N, Morgan M, Alegakis A, Tsafantakis E, Chatziarsenis M, Philalithis A, Jones R. Attitudes to kidney donation among primary care patients in rural Crete, Greece. BMC Public Health. 2009; 9: 54.

  12. Webb G, Phillips N, Reddiford S, Neuberger J. Factors Affecting the decision to grant consent for organ donation: A survey of adults in England. Transplantation. 2015;99: 1396-1402.

  13. McGlade D, Pierscionek B. Can education alter attitudes, behaviour and knowledge about organ donation? A pretest-post-test study. BMJ Open. 2013; 003961.

  14. Alghanim SA. Knowledge and Attitudes toward organ donation: A community-based study comparing rural and urban populations. Saudi Journal Kidney Diseases and Transplantation. 2010; 21 (1): 23-30.

  15. Rodriguez JR, Fleishman A, Fitzpatrick S, Boger M. Organ donation knowledge, willingness, and beliefs of motor vehicle clerks. Transplantation. 2014; 98: 1025-1028.

  16. Ho-ting Li A, Dixon S, Prakash V, Kim SJ, Knoll GA, Lam NN, Gar AX. Physician registration for deceased organ donation. Journal of American Medical Association. 2014; 312 (3): 291-293.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com

Mi perfil

C?MO CITAR (Vancouver)

Rev Mex Traspl. 2015;4