2015, Number 2
<< Back Next >>
Rev Mex Traspl 2015; 4 (2)
Early conversion from calcineurin-inhibitor to everolimus in renal allograft patients controlled trial. 18-months follow-up results
Noyola-Villalobos HF, Espinoza-Mercado F, Jiménez-Chavarría E, Ramos-Díaz E, Loera-Torres MA, Rivera-Navarrete E
Language: Spanish
References: 22
Page: 57-65
PDF size: 281.97 Kb.
ABSTRACT
Background: Chronic allograft nephropathy is the main obstacle to long-term survival of renal allografts involving acute rejection, vascular remodeling, nephrotoxicity associated with calcineurin-inhibitors and cytomegalovirus. Recently there has been an increasingly growing interest in the use of inhibitors of the mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) such as everolimus and sirolimus with demonstrated efficacy in allograft survival rates.
Methodology: Non-inferiority, non-randomized controlled trial, open-label and unicentric study from June 2010 to June 2013. Using a systematic sampling, renal transplant patients were assigned to the everolimus and control group, respectively. Both groups were initially treated with a calcineurin inhibitor, MMF and prednisone during the first three months post-transplant; then the everolimus group suspended calcineurin-inhibitor and were converted to everolimus 1.5 mg/24 hours; control group received standard immunosuppressive regimen. During an 18-month-follow-up serum creatinine, glucose, triglycerides, cholesterol, LDL, hemoglobin, platelets, total leucocyte count were measured, estimated glomerular filtration rate was calculated and adverse reactions were registered. Primary outcomes measures were allograft survival, rejection and mortality.
Results: A total of 58 renal allograft patients were sampled, 30 complied with inclusion criteria and 2 groups were formed with 15 patients each. Everolimus group received 1.5 mg/day (0.75 mg bid po); Control group received Cys (80%), Pred (100%) MMF (53.3%) AZA (46.6%) and Tac (20%). Evl group had 100% allograft survival rate, 0% rejection rate and 1 death with functional allograft. Control group 91.7% renal allograft survival at 18 months (8.3% allograft loss), acute rejection 8.3% and 0% mortality. Statistical analysis for primary outcome measures were not statistically significant for survival (p = 0.35), rejection (p = 0.54) and mortality (p = 0.45).
Conclusions: Early conversion to everolimus is efficient and safe with no increase in clinical rejection rates.
REFERENCES
Nankivell BJ, Borrows RJ, Fung CL et al. The natural history of chronic allograft nephropathy. N Engl J Med. 2003; 349: 2326-2333.
Halloran PF. Call for revolution: A new approach to describing chronic allograft deterioration. Am J Transplant. 2002; 2 (3): 195-200.
Srinivas TR, Kaplan B, Meier-Kriesche HU. Mycophenolate mofetil in solid-organ transplantation. Expert Opin Pharmacother. 2003; 4 (12): 2325-2345.
Halloran P, Mathew T, Tomlanovich S et al. Mycophenolate mofetil in renal allograft recipients: A pooled efficacy analysis of three randomized double-blind, clinical studies in prevention of rejection. The International Mycophenolate Mofetil Renal Transplant Group. Transplantation. 1997; 63 (1): 39-47.
Geissler EK, Schlitt HJ, Thomas G. mTOR, cancer and transplantation. Am J Transplant. 2008; 8 (11): 2212-2218.
Eisen HJ, Tuzcu EM, Dorent R et al. Everolimus for the prevention of allograft rejection and vasculopathy in cardiac-transplant recipients. N Engl J Med. 2003; 349 (9): 847-858.
Tedesco-Silva H Jr, Vitko S, Pascual J et al. 12-month safety and efficacy of everolimus with reduced exposure cyclosporine in de novo renal transplant recipients. Transpl Int. 2007; 20 (1): 27-36.
Cibrik D, Arcona S, Vasquez E et al. Long-term experience with everolimus in kidney Transplantation in the United States. Transplant Proc. 2011; 43 (7): 2562-2567.
Vítko S, Margreiter R, Weimar W et al. Three-year efficacy and safety results from study of everolimus versus mycophenolate mofetil in de novo renal transplant patients. Am J Transplant. 2005; 5 (10): 2521-2530.
Diekmann F, Budde K, Oppenheimer F et al. Predictors of success in conversion from calcineurin inhibitor to sirolimus in chronic allograft dysfunction. Am J Transplant. 2004; 4 (11): 1869-1875.
Ruiz JC, Sanchez-Fructuoso A, Rodrigo E et al. Conversion to everolimus in kidney transplant recipients: a safe and simple procedure. Transplant Proc. 2006; 38 (8): 2424-2426.
Holdaas H, Bentdal O, Pfeffer P et al. Early, abrupt conversion of de novo renal transplant patients from cyclosporine to everolimus: results of a pilot study. Clin Transplant. 2008; 22 (3): 366-371.
Rostaing L, Kamar N. mTOR inhibitor/proliferation signal inhibitors: entering or leaving the field? J Nephrol. 2010; 23 (2): 133-142.
Cotovio P, Neves L, Santos F et al. Conversion to everolimus in kidney transplant recipients: to believe or not believe? Transplant Proc. 2012; 44 (10): 2966-2970.
Webster AC, Lee VW, Chapman JR et al. Target of rapamycin inhibitors (sirolimus and everolimus) for primary immunosupression of kidney transplant recipients: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials. Transplantation. 2006; 81 (9): 1234-1248.
Pengel LH, Liu LQ, Morris PJ. Do wound complications or lymphoceles occur more often in solid organ transplant recipients on mTOR inhibitors? A systematic review of randomized controlled trials. Transpl Int. 2011; 24 (12): 1216-1230.
Dean PG, Lund WJ, Larson TS et al. Wound-healing complications after kidney transplantation: a prospective, randomized comparison of sirolimus and tacrolimus. Transplantation. 2004; 77 (10): 1555-1561.
Nashan B, Citterio F. Wound healing complications and the use of mammalian target of rapamycin Inhibitors in kidney transplantation: a critical review of the literature. Transplantation. 2012; 94 (6): 547-561.
Shihab FS, Cibrik D, Chan L et al. Association of clinical events with everolimus exposure in kidney transplant patients receiving reduced cyclosporine. Clin Transplant. 2013; 27 (2): 217-226.
Cibrik D, Silva HT Jr, Vathsala A et al. Randomized trial of everolimus-facilitated calcineurin inhibitor minimization over 24 months in renal transplantation. Transplantation. 2013; 95 (7): 933-42.
Pape L, Ahlenstiel T. mTOR inhibitors in pediatric kidney transplantation. Pediatr Nephrol. 2014; 29 (7): 1119-1129.
Moscarelli L, Caroti L, Antognoli G et al. Everolimus leads to lower risk of BKV viremia tan mycophenolic acid in de novo renal transplantation patients: a single-center experience. Clin Transplant. 2013; 27 (4): 546-554.