medigraphic.com
SPANISH

Revista Cubana de Medicina Militar

ISSN 1561-3046 (Electronic)
  • Contents
  • View Archive
  • Information
    • General Information        
    • Directory
  • Publish
    • Instructions for authors        
  • medigraphic.com
    • Home
    • Journals index            
    • Register / Login
  • Mi perfil

2015, Number 2

<< Back Next >>

Rev Cub Med Mil 2015; 44 (2)

Modified Blatchford Scale for non-variceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding

Infante VM, Roselló OR, Ramos CJY, Rodríguez ÁD, Guisado RY, García VME
Full text How to cite this article

Language: Spanish
References: 17
Page: 179-186
PDF size: 127.25 Kb.


Key words:

upper gastrointestinal bleeding, predicts scale, abbreviated Blatchford scale, relative risk, endoscopy.

ABSTRACT

Introduction: prognostic scales have a wide use in the diagnosis, treatment and monitoring patients with non-variceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding.
Objective: determine the predictive ability of clinical component elements of Blatchford modified scale to identify patients most likely to have stigmata of active or recent bleeding during emergency endoscopy.
Methods: observational, analytical and prospective study. All patients were included, 188, assisted in the emergency unit at "Dr. Luis Díaz Soto" Central Military Hospital, from January 1 to December 31, 2012. An estimate risk for each scale components was performed. The predictive value using ROC curve was calculated. The sensitivity and specificity of cut off 1 was determined.
Results: 61 (32.4 %) out of the patients studied had scars of active or recent bleeding. Stigmas are more likely found in cases with systolic blood pressure ≤ 90 mmHg (RR 7.53; 95 % CI 2.31 to 24.48; p= 0.001), heart rate ≥ 100 beats min (RR 5.49; 95 % CI 2.78 to 10.83; p= 0.001) and hemoglobin ≤ 10 g/dL (RR 4.39; 95% CI 2.17 to 8.89; p = 0.001). The predictive capacity of Blatchford scale was good (c= 0.729; 95 % CI: 0.652 to 0.807; p= .001). The cut point 1 showed a sensitivity of 11.81 % and a specificity of 98.36 %.
Conclusions: the value of the Blatchford scale is confirmed abbreviated to predict the presence of stigmata of active or recent bleeding during endoscopic study in patients with non-variceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding.


REFERENCES

  1. Blatchford O, Murray W, Blatchford M. A risk score to predict need for treatment for upper-gastrointestinal haemorrhage. Lancet. 2000;356:1318-21.

  2. Koksal O, Ozeren G, Ozdemir F, Armagan E, Aydin S, Ayyildiz T. Prospective validation of the Glasgow Blatchford scoring system in patients with upper gastrointestinal bleeding in the emergency department. Turk J Gastroenterol. 2012;23(5):448-55.

  3. Ahn S, Lim KS, Lee YS, Lee JL. Blatchford score is a useful tool for predicting the need for intervention in cancer patients with upper gastrointestinal bleeding. J Gastroenterol Hepatol [Internet]. 2013 [cited 2014 Feb 23];28(8):1288-94. Available from: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jgh.12179/full

  4. Romagnuolo J, Barkun AN, Enns R, Armstrong D, Gregor J. Simple clinical predictors may obviate urgent endoscopy in selected patients with nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal tract bleeding. Arch Intern Med. 2007 Feb 12;167(3):265-70.

  5. Le Jeune IR, Gordon AL, Farrugia D, Manwani R, Guha IN, James MW. Safe discharge of patients with low-risk upper gastrointestinal bleeding (UGIB): can the use of Glasgow-Blatchford Bleeding Score be extended? Acute Med. 2011;10(4):176-81.

  6. Dicu D, Pop F, Ionescu D, Dicu T. Comparison of risk scoring systems in predicting clinical outcome at upper gastrointestinal bleeding patients in an emergency unit. Am J Emerg Med [Internet]. 2013 [cited 2014 Feb 8];31(1):94-9. Available from: http://www.clinicalkey.com/content/playBy/pii?v=S0735-6757(12)00334-8

  7. Sung JJ, Chan FK, Chen M, Ching JY, Ho KY, Kachintorn U, et al. Asia-Pacific Working Group consensus on non-variceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding. Gut [Internet]. 2011 [cited 2014 Feb 4];60(9):1170-7. Available from: http://gut.bmj.com/content/60/9/1170.long

  8. Barkun A, Bardou M, Marshall JK. Consensus Recommendations for Managing Patients with Nonvariceal Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding. Annals of Internal Medicine. 2003;139(10):843-57.

  9. Barkun AN, Bardou M, Kuipers EJ, Sung J, Hunt RH, Martel M, et al. International consensus recommendations on the management of patients with nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding. Annals of Internal Medicine [Internet]. 2010 [cited 2014 Oct 3];152(2):101-13. Available from: http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=mdc&AN=20083829&lang =es&site=ehost-live

  10. Ali H, Lang E, Barkan A. Emergency department risk stratification in upper gastrointestinal bleeding. CJEM [Internet]. 2012 [cited 2014 Feb 23];14(1):45-9. Available from: http://www.cjem-online.ca/v14/n1/p45

  11. Wang CH, Chen YW, Young YR, Yang CJ, Chen IC. A prospective comparison of 3 scoring systems in upper gastrointestinal bleeding. Am J Emerg Med [Internet]. 2013 Mar 1 [cited 2014 Ene 18]:775-8. Available from: http://www.clinicalkey.com/content/playBy/pii?v=S0735-6757(13)00024-7

  12. Farooq FT, Lee MH, Das A, Dixit R, Wong RC. Clinical triage decision vs risk scores in predicting the need for endotherapy in upper gastrointestinal bleeding. Am J Emerg Med [Internet]. 2012 [cited 2014 May 16];30(1):129-34. Available from: http://www.clinicalkey.com/content/playBy/pii?v=S0735-6757(10)00547-4

  13. Cheng DW, Lu YW, Teller T, Sekhon HK, Wu BU. A modified Glasgow Blatchford Score improves risk stratification in upper gastrointestinal bleed: a prospective comparison of scoring systems. Aliment Pharmacol Ther [Internet]. 2012 [cited 2014 Ago 20];36(8):782-9. Available from: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/apt.12029/full

  14. Téllez-Ávila FI, García-Osogobio S, Chávez-Tapia N. Letter: scoring systems for upper gastrointestinal bleeding. Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics [Internet]. 2013 [cited 2014 May 13];37(3):364. Available from: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/apt.12120/full

  15. Cheng DW, Lu YW, Teller T, Sekhon HK, Wu BU. Letter: Scoring systems for upper gastrointestinal bleeding--authors' reply. Aliment Pharmacol Ther [Internet]. 2013 [cited 2014 Sep 11];37(3):365. Available from: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/apt.12167/full

  16. Bryant RV, Kuo P, Williamson K, Yam C, Schoeman MN, Holloway RH, et al. Performance of the Glasgow-Blatchford score in predicting clinical outcomes and intervention in hospitalized patients with upper GI bleeding. Gastrointest Endosc [Internet]. 2013 [cited 2014 Feb 23];78(4):576-83. Available from: http://www.clinicalkey.com/content/playBy/pii?v=S0016-5107(13)01870-1

  17. Meltzer AC, Burnett S, Pinchbeck C, Brown AL, Choudhri T, Yadav K, et al. Preendoscopic Rockall and Blatchford scores to identify which emergency department patients with suspected gastrointestinal bleed do not need endoscopic hemostasis. J Emerg Med [Internet]. 2013 [cited 2014 Abr 3];44(6):1083-7. Available from: http://www.clinicalkey.com/content/playBy/pii?v=S0736-4679(12)01459-X




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com

Mi perfil

C?MO CITAR (Vancouver)

Rev Cub Med Mil . 2015;44