medigraphic.com
SPANISH

Revista Clínica de la Escuela de Medicina de la Universidad de Costa Rica

  • Contents
  • View Archive
  • Information
    • General Information        
    • Directory
  • Publish
    • Instructions for authors        
  • medigraphic.com
    • Home
    • Journals index            
    • Register / Login
  • Mi perfil

2015, Number 4

<< Back Next >>

Rev Clin Esc Med 2015; 5 (4)

Identificación de los factores más importantes que influyen en el nivel de independencia de los nonagenarios y centenarios costarricenses

Ramírez UX, Bolaños SM
Full text How to cite this article

Language: Spanish
References: 31
Page: 88-100
PDF size: 705.33 Kb.


Key words:

Ninety year olds, hundred year olds, functional capacity, independence.

ABSTRACT

In recent years, Costa Rica has experienced an increase in its citizens’ life expectancy and an improvement in its healthcare system. As a result, the country is now dealing with a demographical transition in which it is common to see healthcare users aged 90+. By studying this population – a sample representative of the larger population of senior citizens – researchers can gain insight on their health statuses and factors that affect longevity, which can be further studied and used to create the programs that these citizens need to maximize their functional independence. The goal of this study is to document the sociodemographic characteristics, and the medical and functional condition of the ninety and hundred year old senior citizens within the sample, as well as to document the most important factors affecting their independence, both in their basic and instrumental activities. The information used was gathered from the CRELES (Costa Rica, Longevity and Healthy Aging Study, as per its Spanish acronym), a study that has been led by the Central American Population Center since 2002. In this study a survey was administered to a nationally representative sample of 8,000 senior citizens. Subsequently geriatric scales and tests, and other performance tests were applied to a subsample of 3,000 senior citizens. This is a descriptive and analytical cross-sectional study. In total 278 people over ninety years of age were studied, representing 9.8% of the individuals included in the CRELES study. Among the most important findings was the fact that most participants are female and that 30.9% of them had no formal education (illiterate). Up to 18% of the individuals were from the province of Alajuela and worked in agriculture. The most frequent pathologies were sleep disorders (51%) and hypertension (44%); 14% reported having no previous pathologies. 24.9% of the individuals had a BMI of less than 20. 17.9% of the individuals had received no chronic treatments and 81% of them had never been hospitalized. Regarding participant’s selfperceived health status, 63% of them considered that they had a good to excellent health. Upon assessing their functional conditions, it is clear that 32% of them are completely independent in Basic Daily Activities and up to 6% of them are also independent in their daily instrumental activities. As participants become older they become more dependent (p = 0.001) and men are more independent than women (p = 0.028). Their instrumental activities were positively affected by hypercholesterolemia, in that their degree of independence was higher when this condition was present (p = 0.088). These findings should allow better measures to be taken for the early detection of risk factors. That includes the patient’s nutritional condition, their functional condition and, most importantly, the management of chronic diseases that decrease the risk of cerebrovascular diseases, all of which help decrease the risk of disabilities in senior citizens when dealt with early, but especially in older individuals, those who are most vulnerable.


REFERENCES

  1. Censos nacionales. Instituto Nacional de Estadística y Censos. Proyecciones y Estimaciones de Población, 1995-2025. Programa Centroamericano de Población, UCR y Área de Estadística y Censos, MEIC. 1998

  2. Grimley T Franklin B Lynn JP Wilcock GK. Oxford textbook of geriatric medicine Oxford University Press, Oxford. 2nd Edition 2000. Pages: 1264

  3. Willcox BJ Willcox DC He Q Curb JD Suzuki M. Siblings of Okinawan Centenarians Share Lifelong Mortality Advantages. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2006;61(4):345-354.

  4. Perls T Terry D. Understanding the determinants of exceptional longevity. Ann Intern Med. 2003;139(5):445-449.

  5. Terry DF Wilcox MA McCormick MA et al. Lower all cause, cardiovascular, and cancer mortality in centenarians’offspring. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2004; 52:2074-2076.

  6. Hitt R Young-Xu Y Silver M Perls T Centenarians: the older you get, the healthier you have been. Lancet. 1999;354:652.

  7. Perls TT Wilmoth J Levenson R et al. Life-long sustained mortality advantage of siblings of centenarians. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2002;99(12):8442-8447.

  8. Evert J Lawler E Bogan H Perls T. Morbidity profiles of centenarians: survivors, delayers and escapers. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2003; 58(3): 232-237.

  9. Perls T Terry D. Genetics of exceptional longevity. Exp Gerontol. 2003;38(7): 725-730.

  10. Bruunsgaard H Andersen-Ranberg K Hjelmborg JV Pedersen BK, Jeune B. Elevated levels of tumor necrosis factor alpha and mortality in centenarians. Am J Med. 2003;115(4):278-283.

  11. Silver MH Jilinskaia E Perls TT. Cognitive functional status of age-confirmed centenarians in a population-based study. J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2001;56(3):134-140.

  12. Rosero L. Son los nonagenarios costarricense los seres humanos más longevos? Ensayos en Honor a Víctor Céspe des Solano. Academia de Centroamérica. 2005;161-188.

  13. Andersen-Ranberg K Schroll M Jeune B. Healthy centenarians do not exist, but autonomous centenarians do: a population-based study of morbidity among Danish centenarians. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2001;49(7):900-908.

  14. Bernstein AM Willcox BJ Tamaki H et al. First autopsy study of an Okinawan centenarian. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2004;59(11):1195-1199.

  15. Fries JF. Aging, natural death, and the compression of morbidity. N Engl J Med. 1980;303:130-135.

  16. Perls TT Bochen K Freeman M Alpert L Silver MH. Validity of reported age and centenarian prevalence in New England. Age and Ageing. 1999; 28(2): 193-197.

  17. O'Mahony D Gallagher PF. Inappropriate prescribing in the older population: need for new criteria. Age and Ageing. 2008;37(2):138-141.

  18. Kaufman DW Kelly JP Rosenberg L Anderson TE Mitchell AA. Recent patterns of medication use in the ambulatory adult population of the Unite States. JAMA. 2002;287(3):337-344.

  19. Cannon KT Choi MM Zuniga MA. Potentially inappropriate medication use in elderly patients receiving home health care: a retrospective data analysis. Am J Geriatr Pharmacother. 2006; 4(2):134-143.

  20. Zhang MY Katzman R Salmon D et al. The prevalence of dementia and Alzheimer's disease in Shanghai, China: Impact of age, gender and education. Ann Neurol. 1990;27(4):428-437.

  21. Jiménez M Sola JM Pérez C et al. Estudio del estado nutricional de los ancianos de Cantabria. Nutr Hosp 2011; 26(2):345-354.

  22. Nakano T Ito H. Epidemiology of diabetes mellitus in old age in Japan. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2010;77(Suppl 1):76-81.

  23. Parker CJ Morgan K Dewey ME. Physical illness and disability among elderly people in England and Wales: the Medical Research Council Cognitive Function and Ageing Study. The Analysis Group. J Epidemiol Community Health. 1997;51(5):494–501.

  24. Avlund K Davidsen M Schultz-Larsen K. Changes in functional ability from ages 70 to 75. J Aging Health. 1995;7 (2):254-282.

  25. Elkind MS. Stroke in the elderly. Mt Sinai J Med. 2003;70(1):27-37.

  26. Menéndez J Guevara A Arcia N León EM Marín C Alfonso JC. Enfermedades crónicas y limitación funcional en adultos mayores: estudio comparativo en siete ciudades de América Latina y el Caribe. Rev Panam Salud Pública. 2005;17(5/6):353-361. 26. Olindo S Cabre P Deschamps R et al. Acute stroke in the very elderly: epidemiological features, stroke subtypes, management, and outcome in Martinique, French West Indies. Stroke. 2003;34(7):1593-1597.

  27. Guralnik JM Ferrucci L Simonsick EM Salive ME Wallace RB. Lower extremity function in persons over the age of 70 years as a predictor of subsequent disability. N Engl J Med 1995;332:556-561.

  28. Fried LP Herdman SJ Kuhn KE Rubin G Turano K. Preclinical disability: hypotheses about the bottom of the iceberg. J Aging Health. 1991;3:285-300.

  29. Fried LP Tangen CM Walston J et al. Frailty in older adults: evidence for a phenotype. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2001;56(3):146-156.

  30. Ranieri P Rozzini R Franzoni S Barbisoni P Trabucchi M. Serum cholesterol levels as a measure of frailty in the hospitalized elderly patients. Exp Aging Res. 1998;24(2):169-179.

  31. Walston J McBurnie MA Newman A et al. Frailty and activation of the inflammation and coagulation systems with and without clinical comorbidities. Arch Intern Med. 2002;162(20):2333- 2241.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com

Mi perfil

C?MO CITAR (Vancouver)

Rev Clin Esc Med. 2015;5