medigraphic.com
SPANISH

Revista Mexicana de Angiología

Órgano Oficial de la Sociedad Mexicana de Angiología y Cirugía Vascular
  • Contents
  • View Archive
  • Information
    • General Information        
    • Directory
  • Publish
    • Instructions for authors        
  • medigraphic.com
    • Home
    • Journals index            
    • Register / Login
  • Mi perfil

2005, Number 4

<< Back Next >>

Rev Mex Angiol 2005; 33 (4)

Carotid, jugular and aortics paragangliomas. 25 years experience

Martínez LC, Sánchez MB, Arriola GHF, Llaven RR, Bacelis ARA
Full text How to cite this article

Language: Spanish
References: 11
Page: 110-113
PDF size: 323.92 Kb.


Key words:

Paraganglioma, glomus caroticum.

ABSTRACT

Objective: To determine the tumor most frequent localization, presentation, appearance, diagnosis confirmation and provided treatment, as well as the complications among paraganglioma-diagnosed patients between January 1974 and July1999 in several IMSS hospitals, where the author has worked.
Methods: We made retrospective revision between 1974 and 1999, obtaining a total of 92 carotid, jugular and aortic cases of paragangliomas. The age average was of 40 years, with predominance of feminine sex (80.43%), the bilaterality appeared in the carotid localization and it was of 4.34%. The ultrasound was made in 100% and arteriography in 95.65%.
Results: During the surgery the tumors of the caroticum glomus were classified according to Shamblin in: type I 63.85%, 28.91% type II and type III the 7.22%. Two deaths were registered, one occurred in a paraganglioma of the aortic bifurcation and another in one of the carotids. There was affection of craneal nerve pairs in 16 cases (17.97%), the hypoglossus, the recurrent laringeal nerve and the superior laringeal nerve being affected. The patients’ follow-up by ultrasound did not show any relapse of the tumor.
Conclusions:. The data provided by our revision with respect to localization and results after surgery, are similar to others published by different series.


REFERENCES

  1. Krempl G, Loftus C. Managament of tumors involving the cervical carotid. 1st. Ed. New York: Thieme Medical Publishers; 2000.

  2. Veith F. Vascular surgery: carotid body tumors. 2nd Ed. McGraw Hill; 1994.

  3. Haimovici H. Vascular surgery: carotid body tumors. 4th Ed. Blackwell Science; 1996.

  4. Shamblin WR, ReMine WH, Sheps SG, Harrison EG. Carotid body tumor (chemodectoma): Clinicopathologic analysis of ninety cases. Am J Surg 1971; 122: 732-9.

  5. Jensen JC, Choyke PL, Rosenfeld M, Pass HI, Keiser H, White B, et al. A report of familial carotid body tumors and multiple extraadrenal pheochromocytomas. J Urol 1991; 145: 1040-2.

  6. Marchand F. Carotid body tumor. Int Beitr Wissensch Med 1991; 1: 537.

  7. Wilson H. Carotid body tumors: Familial and bilateral. Ann Surg 1970; 171: 843-8.

  8. Muhm M, Polterauer P, Gstottner W, Temmel A, Richling B, Undt G, et al. Diagnostic and therapeutic approaches to carotid body tumors: Review of 24 patients. Arch Surg 1997; 132: 279-84.

  9. Chedid A, Jao W. Hereditary tumors of the carotid bodies and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Cancer 1974; 33: 1635-41.

  10. Gruber H, Metson R. Carotid body paraganglioma regression with relief of hypoxemia. Ann Intern Med 1980; 92: 800-2.

  11. Grufferman S, Gillman MW, Pasternak LR, Peterson CL, Young WG Jr. Familial carotid body tumors: case report and epidemiologic review. Cancer 1980; 46: 2116-22.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com

Mi perfil

C?MO CITAR (Vancouver)

Rev Mex Angiol. 2005;33