Aranda-Moreno C, Jáuregui -Renaud K

Language: Spanish
References: 11
Page: 22-27
PDF size: 74.02 Kb.

ABSTRACT

Objective. To assess and compare the accuracy to perceive visual verticality, with and without trunk-head tilt in the frontal plane (30°), in patients with peripheral or central vestibular disease. Methods. Thirty eight patients accepted to participate, 23 with peripheral disease and 15 with central disease. We also evaluated 40 healthy subjects. Subjects were seated facing a screen with an anchored motorized bar (20 cm). They were asked to bring the line to vertical, using a joystick, 10 times while seated upright and 10 times while tilted 30° to each side. An average of the distance from true vertical was calculated to determine the tilt of the visual vertical on each posture. Results. Always, estimations made by healthy subjects were ‹ 2° from true vertical. In patients, in upright posture the largest tilt of the visual vertical was observed in patients with peripheral disease and spontaneous nystagmus. However, in all patients the accuracy to estimate the true vertical decreased when they were evaluated with trunk-head tilt (p ‹ 0.05). In this condition the sensitivity of the test increased from 34 to 85% and the efficacy from 68 to 93% (p &38249; 0.05). Conclusion. Trunk-head tilt in the frontal plane decreases the accuracy of patients with vestibular disease to visually perceive verticality. This finding shows that head-trunk tilt can improve the sensibility and efficacy of this test to assess the vestibular function.

REFERENCES

1. Fluur E, Melltröm A. Utricular stimulation and oculomotor reactions. Laryngoscope 1970; 80: 1701-12.

2. Fluur E, Melltröm A. The otolith organs and their influence on oculomotor movements. Exp Neurol 1971; 30: 139-47.

3. Fluur E, Melltröm A. Sacular stimulation and oculomotor reactions. Laryngoscope 1970; 80: 1713-21.

4. Gresty MA, Bronstein AM, Brandt T, Dieterich M. Neurology of otolith function. Brain 1992; 115: 647-73.

5. Lempert T, Gresty MA, Bronstein AM. Horizontal linear vestibulo-ocular reflex testing in patients with peripheral vestibular dosorders. Ann N Y Acad Sci 1999; 871: 232- 47.

6. Friedman G. The judgment of visual vertical and horizontal with peripheral and central vestibular lesions. Brain 1970; 93: 313-28.

7. Vibert D, Häusler R, Safran AB. Subjetive visual vertical in peripheral unilateral vestibular diseases. J Vest Res 1999; 9: 145-52.

8. Bömer A, Mast F. Assessing otolith function by the subjetive visual vertical. Ann N Y Acad Sci 1999; 871: 221-31.

9. Brandt T, Dieterich M. Vestibular syndromes in the roll plane: topographic diagnosis from brainstem to cortex. Ann Neurol 1994; 36: 337-47.

10. Gómez García A, Jáuregui Renaud K. Subjective assessment of verticality in follow-up of patients with acute vestibular disease. Ent J 2003; 82: 442-6.

11. Aranda MC, Jáuregui-Renaud K, Coba Pastrana C. Precisión de la estimación visual de lo vertical en sujetos con lesión vestibular. Rev Fac Med UNAM 1997; 40(Suppl 16): 570.