medigraphic.com
ISSN 1029-3019 (Electronic)

2015, Number 12

<< Back Next >>

MediSan 2015; 19 (12)

Peritoneal Pseudomyxomata tumor as uncommon cause of massive mixed ascites

Frómeta GA, Gordillo VRM, Valarezo SD, Vázquez IWH, Velasteguí M

Language: Spanish
References: 10
Page: 6016-6021
PDF size: 126.21 Kb.


ABSTRACT

The case report of a 32 years patient with history of progressive increase in abdomen volume making difficult breathing and feeding is presented. She is admitted in the Internal Medicine Service of the Ecuatorian institute hospital of social insurance in Ibarra city, with ascites diagnosis to be studied. When carrying out the abdominal tap, a jelly-like liquid is extracted, reason why the hypothesis of a peritoneal pseudomyxomata tumor is stated. Taking into account these characteristics the biopsy report from an appendectomy made 2 years earlier is recovered, where the presence of an appendix mucinous tumor was found. Cytoreduction surgery was performed without intraperitoneal hyperthermia and the mentioned hypothesis was confirmed.


REFERENCES

  1. Hoyos Valdemar JC, Muñoz Mora A. Masa post apendicectomía (pseudomixoma peritoneal). A propósito de un caso. Rev Colomb Gastroenterol. 2004[citado 12 Febr 2015]; 19(2). Disponible en: http://www.scielo.org.co/scielo.php?pid=S0120- 99572004000200014&script=sci_arttext

  2. Zamorano D, Quiroz F, Drolett N, Carrasco C. Neoplasias malignas primarias del apéndice cecal: estudio comparativo entre 2 hospitales regionales. Rev Chil Cir. 2014 [citado 12 Febr 2015]; 66(6). Disponible en: http://www.scielo.cl/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0718- 40262014000600006

  3. Mella Laborde M, Nofuentes Riera C, Soliveres Soliveres E, Pérez Bru S, Núñez Rodríguez V, Pérez Auladell V, et al. Abdomen agudo por mucocele apendicular perforado. Acta Gastroenterol Latinoam. 2012; 42(4):329-32.

  4. Vidal R, Campos S, Vázquez-Rodríguez M, Prieto O, García-Giménez E, Carbajales A. Adenocarcinoma mucinoso intestinal sobre teratoma maduro quístico de ovario. A propósito de un caso. Clin Invest Gin Obst. 2012; 39(2):1-3.

  5. Carranza Martínez I, Cornejo López G, Monroy Argumedo M, Villanueva Sáenz E. Pseudomixoma peritoneal. Reporte de dos casos. Cir Cir. 2014 [citado 12 Febr 2015];82(2). Disponible en: http://www.medigraphic.com/pdfs/circir/cc- 2014/cc142m.pdf

  6. Sugarbaker PH. Twenty-three years of progress in the management of a rare disease. Dis Colon Rectum. 2011; 54(3):265-6.

  7. Tapia O. Mucocele apendicular gigante: Reporte de un caso y revisión de la literatura. Int J Morphol. 2012; 30(3): 891-4.

  8. Wang H, Chen YQ, Wei R, Wang QB, Song B, Wang CY, et al. Appendiceal mucocele: A diagnostic dilemma in differentiating malignant from benign lesions with CT. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2013; 201(4): W590-5.

  9. Llanio Navarro R, Perdomo González G, Arus Soler ER, Fernández Naranjo A, Fernández Sacasas JA, Catarama Peñate M, et al. Propedéutica clínica y semiología médica. t 2. La Habana: Editorial Ciencias Médicas; 2005. [citado 16 Febr 2015]. Disponible en: http://www.bvs.sld.cu/libros_texto/propedeuticatomo2/indice_p.html

  10. Rey RJ, Solari LA. Lo cotidiano, lo agudo, lo complejo. En: Medicina Interna Endócrina. t 4. 2011[citado 16 Febr 2015]. Disponible en: http://docplayer.es/1279681-Lo-cotidiano-lo-agudo-lo-complejo-tomo-4-medicinainterna- endocrina.html




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com