Carriel PC

Language: Spanish
References: 10
Page: 93-94
PDF size: 80.41 Kb.

Text Extraction

No abstract.

REFERENCES

1. B.C. Moore, Dead regions in the cochlea: conceptual foundations, diagnosis, and clinical applications, Ear Hear. 2004; 25: 98–116.

2. B.C. Moore, B.R. Glasberg, M.A. Stone, New version of the TEN test with calibrations in dB HL, Ear Hear. 2004; 25: 478–487.

3. B.C. Moore, M. Huss, D.A. Vickers, B.R. Glasberg, J.I. Alcántara, A test for the diagnosis of dead regions in the cochlea, Br. J. Audiol. 2000; 34: 205–224.

4. H. Aazh, B.C. Moore, Dead regions in the cochlea at 4 kHz in elderly adults: relation to absolute threshold, steepness of audiogram, and pure-tone average, J. Am. Acad. Audiol. 2007; 18: 97–106.

5. B.C. Moore, Dead regions in the cochlea: diagnosis, perceptual consequences, and implications for the fitting of hearing aids, Trends Amplif. 2001; 5: 1–34.

6. — Vinay, Moore BC. Prevalence of dead regions in subjects with sensorineural hearing loss, Ear Hear. 2007; 28: 231–241.

7. — Kluk K, Moore BC. Detecting dead regions using psychophysical tuning curves: a comparison of simultaneous and forward masking, Int. J. Audiol. 2006; 45: 463–476.

8. — Pepler A, Munro KJ, Lewis K, Kluk K. Prevalence of cochlear dead regions in new referrals and existing adult hearing aid users, Ear Hear. 2014; 35: e99–e109.

9. — American Speech-Language-Hearing Association, Guidelines for manual puretone threshold audiometry. http://www.asha.org/policy/GL2005-00014/

10. — Preminger JE, Carpenter R, Ziegler CH. A clinical perspective on cochlear dead regions: intelligibility of speech and subjective hearing aid benefit, J. Am. Acad. Audiol. 2005; 16: 600–613.