medigraphic.com
SPANISH

Revista Cubana de Oftalmología

ISSN 1561-3070 (Electronic)
  • Contents
  • View Archive
  • Information
    • General Information        
    • Directory
  • Publish
    • Instructions for authors        
  • medigraphic.com
    • Home
    • Journals index            
    • Register / Login
  • Mi perfil

2015, Number 3

<< Back Next >>

Rev Cub Oftal 2015; 28 (3)

Update on the selection of patients for refractive surgery

Miranda HI, Barroso LR, Perea HL, Ramos PY
Full text How to cite this article

Language: Spanish
References: 10
Page: 303-309
PDF size: 95.71 Kb.


Key words:

laser refractive surgery, LASIK, LASEK.

ABSTRACT

The present paper made a search for the most updated literature in the last five years, focused on expert publications and based on a recent review appeared in Current Opinion in Ophthalmology Journal by a group of researchers from the University of Baltimore in Maryland, United States of America on the current counter indications of the refractive surgery. The American Academy of Ophthalmology systematically publishes the practical guidelines for laser refractive surgery. The objective of this review was to provide update on the current counter indications and the specific details of the laser refractive surgery.


REFERENCES

  1. Bower KS, Woreta F. Update on contraindications for laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis and photorefractive keratectomy. Current Opinion. Ophthalmology. 2014;25(4):251-7.

  2. Merayo Lloves J. Conceptos actuales en ojo seco. Del síndrome a la enfermedad. Grupo Español de Superficie Ocular y Córnea (GESOC). 2012 [citado 14 de abril de 2014]. Disponible en: http://www.ojoseco.org/wpcontent/ uploads/2012/09/ojoseco.pdf

  3. Viso E, Rodríguez-Ares MT, Gude F. Prevalence of and associated factors for dry eye in a Spanish adult population (the Salnes Eye Study). Ophthalmic Epidemiol. 2009;16(1):15-21.

  4. Wu D, Wang Y, Zhang L, Wei S, Tang X. Corneal biomechanical effects: Smallincision lenticule extraction versus femtosecond laser-assisted laser in situ keratomileusis. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2014;40(6):954-62.

  5. American Academy of Ophthalmology. Preferred Practice Patterns Committee. Preferred Practice Pattern Guidelines. Refractive errors and refractive surgery. San Francisco, CA: American Academy of Ophthalmology; 2013.

  6. Vejarano Restrepo MI, Amalla Espinos A, Sierra Suárez DF. Buscando la Emetropía en el queratocono: tratamiento complementario del queratocono con lentes fáquicos tóricos ICL ® luego de anillos intraestromales INTACS® y Crosslinking corneal. Reporte de caso. Rev Colombiana Oftalmol. 2009 [citado 7 de julio de 2013];42(4):[aprox. 10. p.]. Disponible en: http://www.socoftal.com/public/website/.../revista_SCO_v42-4_2009.pdf

  7. Esteban de Antonio M. Recuperación de la aptitud laboral mediante cirugía refractiva. An Soc Ergof Esp. 1992;21(4):189-202.

  8. Aquino Fernández JL, Machado Fernández EJ. Astigmatismo después de cirugía refractiva corneal con láser de excímeros. Reporte preliminar. Rev Cubana Oftalmol. 2005 [citado 7 de julio 2013];18(1):[aprox. 12 p.]. Disponible en: http://www.bvs.sld.cu/revistas/oft/vol18_1_05/oft10105.pdf

  9. Paciuc Beja M, García G, Dalma J, Quiroz-Mercado H. Epiretinal membrane after laser in situ keratomileusis. Case Rep Ophthalmol Med. 2013 [citado 14 de abril de 2014]:[aprox. 21 p.]. Disponible en: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3638499/

  10. American Academy of Ophthalmology. Orbit, Eyelids and Lacrimal system. EE.UU.: American Academy of Ophthalmology; 2011 (Basic and Clinical Science Course.).




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com

Mi perfil

C?MO CITAR (Vancouver)

Rev Cub Oftal. 2015;28