medigraphic.com
SPANISH

Ginecología y Obstetricia de México

Federación Mexicana de Ginecología y Obstetricia, A.C.
  • Contents
  • View Archive
  • Information
    • General Information        
    • Directory
  • Publish
    • Instructions for authors        
  • medigraphic.com
    • Home
    • Journals index            
    • Register / Login
  • Mi perfil

2005, Number 09

<< Back Next >>

Ginecol Obstet Mex 2005; 73 (09)

Gestational diabetes mellitus. Experience at a third level hospital

María Aurora Ramírez TMA
Full text How to cite this article

Language: Spanish
References: 12
Page: 484-491
PDF size: 68.80 Kb.


Key words:

gestational diabetes mellitus.

ABSTRACT

Background: The prevalence of type 2 diabetes mellitus and of gestational diabetes mellitus is high in the Mexican population; thus, strategies to improve its detection and prevent obstetric and perinatal complications are essential.
Patients and methods: During the period 2000-2004 a total of 8,074 pregnant women were studied from the day of performance, 50-g, 1 hour glucose screening test for gestational diabetes mellitus (ST-GDM) until the end of pregnancy using the same protocol: ST-GDM was performed immediately after 14 weeks of gestation in high-risk women and between 24-28 weeks in those with regular risk. Two weeks later 100-g, 3 hour oral glucose tolerance test (3h-OGTT) was performed in women with ST-GDM &·8805; 130 but ‹ 180 mg/dL, and patients were classified according to Freinkel’s criteria in class A1, A2 and B1 gestational diabetes mellitus. All women received a diet according to their ideal weight for gestational age and, when necessary, insulin was added to achieve an adequate glycemic control. Results: From 8,074 glucose screening tests for gestational diabetes mellitus, 37.2% (n = 2,997) were positive and 17.2% (n = 514) diagnostic for gestational diabetes mellitus (serum glucose ≥ 180 mg/dL). In 2,483 patients, ST-GDM was positive but negative for gestational diabetes (serum glucose ‹130 but ‹180 mg/dL); in 1,070 of them (43.0%) gestational diabetes mellitus was diagnosed by means of 3h-OGTT. The diagnosis of class A1 gestational diabetes mellitus was done in 908 patients (84.9%), A2 in 188 (11.8%) and B1 in 51 (3.2%). Patients with gestational diabetes diagnosed only by an abnormal ST-GDM were classified as class A1 gestational diabetes mellitus. Gestational age at diagnosis by ST-GDM was 12.4 ± 4.7 weeks and 27.4 ± 5.8 weeks when diagnosed by a 3h-OGTT. The total daily dose of insulin required was related to Freinkel’s classification: 16.0% (n = 215/1,345) with class A1 gestational diabetes mellitus required 0.48 ± 0.33 U/day/kg and 85.0% (n=43/51) with class B1 needed 1.0 ± 0.32 U/day/kg at the end of pregnancy, which occurred at 38.2 ± 2.0 weeks in all 3 groups. In decreasing order of occurrence perinatal complications were: pregnancy-induced hypertension (specially in class B1 gestational diabetes mellitus), urinary tract infections and premature rupture of membranes. Birth weights either ‹ 2,500 g or ‹ 4,000 g were more frequent among women with class B1 gestational diabetes, than in the other 2 groups. After pregnancy ended (6-8 weeks), 52.2% of women with gestational diabetes (mostly class B1) was diagnosed with permanent type 2 diabetes mellitus.
Discussion: In this study the percentage of pregnant women diagnosed as having gestational diabetes mellitus exclusively by ST-GDM was high (17.2%). Freinkel’s classification of such disease predicted higher risk in women with class B1 gestational diabetes mellitus for: 1) obstetric complications, 2) higher doses of insulin to achieve an adequate glycemic control; 3) newborns’ birth weight ‹ 2,500 g or ‹ 4,000 g for gestational age, 4) having type 2 diabetes mellitus in late puerperium.


REFERENCES

  1. McCance DR, Pettitt DJ, Hanson RLJ, et al. Birth weight and non-insulin dependent diabetes: thrifty genotype, thrifty phenotype, or surviving small baby genotype? Br Med J 1994;308:942-5.

  2. Espinosa de los Monteros A, Parra A, Cariño N, Ramírez A. The reproducibility of the 50-g, 1-hour glucose screen for diabetes in pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol 1993;82:515-8.

  3. Kjos SL, Buchanan TA. Gestational diabetes mellitus. N Engl J Med 1999;341:1749-56.

  4. Espinosa de los Monteros A, Parra A, Hidalgo R, Zambrana M. The after breakfast 50-g 1-hour glucose challenge test in urban Mexican pregnant women: its sensitivity and specificity evaluated by three diagnostic criteria for gestational diabetes mellitus. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 1999;78:294-8.

  5. Carpenter MW, Coustan DR. Criteria for screening tests for gestational diabetes. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1982;144:768-73.

  6. American Diabetes Association. Gestational diabetes mellitus. Diabetes Care 2004;27(Suppl 1):S88-S90.

  7. Freinkel N. Banting Lecture 1980. Of pregnancy and progeny. Diabetes 1980;29:1023-35.

  8. Arroyo P, Casanueva E, Reynoso M. Peso esperado para la talla y la edad gestacional. Tablas de referencia. Ginec Obst Mex 1985;53:227-31.

  9. Jovanovic L. Role of diet and insulin treatment of diabetes in pregnancy. Clin Obstet Gynecol 2000;43:46-55.

  10. Vaca-Franske D, Ramírez Torres MA. Clasificación de Freinkel para el manejo de la diabetes gestacional en el INPer (Instituto Nacional de Perinatología). Tesis recepcional de la especialidad de ginecoobstetricia. México: UNAM, 1988.

  11. Dooley SL, Metzger BE, Cho NH. Gestational diabetes mellitus. Influence of race on disease prevalence and perinatal outcome in a U.S. population. Diabetes 1991;40(Suppl 2):25-9.

  12. The expert committee on the diagnosis and classification of diabetes mellitus. Follow-up report on the diagnosis of diabetes mellitus. Diabetes Care 2003;26:3160-7.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com

Mi perfil

C?MO CITAR (Vancouver)

Ginecol Obstet Mex. 2005;73